Bayesian parameter inference for shallow subsurface modeling using field data and impacts on geothermal planning

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DataCentric Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1017/dce.2022.32
M. Kreitmair, N. Makasis, K. Menberg, A. Bidarmaghz, G. Farr, D. Boon, R. Choudhary
{"title":"Bayesian parameter inference for shallow subsurface modeling using field data and impacts on geothermal planning","authors":"M. Kreitmair, N. Makasis, K. Menberg, A. Bidarmaghz, G. Farr, D. Boon, R. Choudhary","doi":"10.1017/dce.2022.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Understanding the subsurface is crucial in building a sustainable future, particularly for urban centers. Importantly, the thermal effects that anthropogenic infrastructure, such as buildings, tunnels, and ground heat exchangers, can have on this shared resource need to be well understood to avoid issues, such as overheating the ground, and to identify opportunities, such as extracting and utilizing excess heat. However, obtaining data for the subsurface can be costly, typically requiring the drilling of boreholes. Bayesian statistical methodologies can be used towards overcoming this, by inferring information about the ground by combining field data and numerical modeling, while quantifying associated uncertainties. This work utilizes data obtained in the city of Cardiff, UK, to evaluate the applicability of a Bayesian calibration (using GP surrogates) approach to measured data and associated challenges (previously not tested) and to obtain insights on the subsurface of the area. The importance of the data set size is analyzed, showing that more data are required in realistic (field data), compared to controlled conditions (numerically-generated data), highlighting the importance of identifying data points that contain the most information. Heterogeneity of the ground (i.e., input parameters), which can be particularly prominent in large-scale subsurface domains, is also investigated, showing that the calibration methodology can still yield reasonably accurate results under heterogeneous conditions. Finally, the impact of considering uncertainty in subsurface properties is demonstrated in an existing shallow geothermal system in the area, showing a higher than utilized ground capacity, and the potential for a larger scale system given sufficient demand.","PeriodicalId":34169,"journal":{"name":"DataCentric Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DataCentric Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2022.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the subsurface is crucial in building a sustainable future, particularly for urban centers. Importantly, the thermal effects that anthropogenic infrastructure, such as buildings, tunnels, and ground heat exchangers, can have on this shared resource need to be well understood to avoid issues, such as overheating the ground, and to identify opportunities, such as extracting and utilizing excess heat. However, obtaining data for the subsurface can be costly, typically requiring the drilling of boreholes. Bayesian statistical methodologies can be used towards overcoming this, by inferring information about the ground by combining field data and numerical modeling, while quantifying associated uncertainties. This work utilizes data obtained in the city of Cardiff, UK, to evaluate the applicability of a Bayesian calibration (using GP surrogates) approach to measured data and associated challenges (previously not tested) and to obtain insights on the subsurface of the area. The importance of the data set size is analyzed, showing that more data are required in realistic (field data), compared to controlled conditions (numerically-generated data), highlighting the importance of identifying data points that contain the most information. Heterogeneity of the ground (i.e., input parameters), which can be particularly prominent in large-scale subsurface domains, is also investigated, showing that the calibration methodology can still yield reasonably accurate results under heterogeneous conditions. Finally, the impact of considering uncertainty in subsurface properties is demonstrated in an existing shallow geothermal system in the area, showing a higher than utilized ground capacity, and the potential for a larger scale system given sufficient demand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用现场数据进行浅层地下建模的贝叶斯参数推断及其对地热规划的影响
摘要了解地下环境对于建设可持续的未来至关重要,尤其是对于城市中心而言。重要的是,需要充分了解建筑物、隧道和地面换热器等人为基础设施对这一共享资源的热影响,以避免出现地面过热等问题,并确定提取和利用多余热量等机会。然而,获取地下数据可能成本高昂,通常需要钻孔。贝叶斯统计方法可用于克服这一问题,通过结合现场数据和数值建模推断地面信息,同时量化相关的不确定性。这项工作利用在英国加的夫市获得的数据,评估贝叶斯校准(使用GP替代品)方法对测量数据和相关挑战(以前未测试)的适用性,并获得该地区地下的见解。分析了数据集大小的重要性,表明与受控条件(数字生成的数据)相比,现实情况下(现场数据)需要更多的数据,突出了识别包含最多信息的数据点的重要性。还研究了地面的不均匀性(即输入参数),这在大规模地下区域中可能特别突出,表明校准方法在不均匀条件下仍然可以产生相当准确的结果。最后,在该地区现有的浅层地热系统中证明了考虑地下性质不确定性的影响,显示出高于利用的地面容量,以及在需求充足的情况下建立更大规模系统的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DataCentric Engineering
DataCentric Engineering Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Semantic 3D city interfaces—Intelligent interactions on dynamic geospatial knowledge graphs Optical network physical layer parameter optimization for digital backpropagation using Gaussian processes Finite element model updating with quantified uncertainties using point cloud data Evaluating probabilistic forecasts for maritime engineering operations Bottom-up forecasting: Applications and limitations in load forecasting using smart-meter data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1