Economic Cycle and Bank Liquidity Hoarding: Are They Procyclical or Countercyclical?

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-05 DOI:10.22452/mjes.vol58no2.3
V. Dang
{"title":"Economic Cycle and Bank Liquidity Hoarding: Are They Procyclical or Countercyclical?","authors":"V. Dang","doi":"10.22452/mjes.vol58no2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper empirically examines bank liquidity hoarding fluctuations over the economic cycle and provides further evidence on the heterogeneous cyclicality of bank liquidity hoarding across different banks in Vietnam for the period 2007–2019. Using both static panel models with the fixed-effects regression using corrected Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and dynamic panel models with the two-step system generalized method of moments estimator, we find that the liquidity hoarding of banks is procyclical. Concretely bank liquidity hoarding on- and off-balance sheets tends to increase during economic upturns and decrease during economic downturns. Our additional analysis yields a consistent pattern that financially weaker banks are more procyclical than their stronger counterparts. During booms and busts, the behaviour of hoarding liquidity is more pronounced for banks with smaller sizes, less capital, more risk, and less profit. This heterogeneity also contributes to understanding the core mechanism behind our main findings, further confirming the precautionary motive of bank liquidity hoarding.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol58no2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper empirically examines bank liquidity hoarding fluctuations over the economic cycle and provides further evidence on the heterogeneous cyclicality of bank liquidity hoarding across different banks in Vietnam for the period 2007–2019. Using both static panel models with the fixed-effects regression using corrected Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and dynamic panel models with the two-step system generalized method of moments estimator, we find that the liquidity hoarding of banks is procyclical. Concretely bank liquidity hoarding on- and off-balance sheets tends to increase during economic upturns and decrease during economic downturns. Our additional analysis yields a consistent pattern that financially weaker banks are more procyclical than their stronger counterparts. During booms and busts, the behaviour of hoarding liquidity is more pronounced for banks with smaller sizes, less capital, more risk, and less profit. This heterogeneity also contributes to understanding the core mechanism behind our main findings, further confirming the precautionary motive of bank liquidity hoarding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济周期与银行流动性囤积:是顺周期还是逆周期?
本文实证研究了银行流动性囤积在经济周期中的波动,并为2007-2019年越南不同银行的银行流动性囤积的异质性周期性提供了进一步的证据。利用修正Driscoll-Kraay标准误差的固定效应回归静态面板模型和矩量估计两步系统广义方法的动态面板模型,我们发现银行的流动性囤积是顺周期的。具体而言,银行在表内和表外的流动性囤积倾向于在经济好转时增加,在经济衰退时减少。我们的进一步分析得出了一个一致的模式,即财务状况较弱的银行比财务状况较强的银行更具有顺周期性。在繁荣和萧条时期,对于规模较小、资本较少、风险较大、利润较低的银行来说,囤积流动性的行为更为明显。这种异质性也有助于理解我们主要发现背后的核心机制,进一步证实了银行流动性囤积的预防性动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1