Law enforcement against investment fraud: a comparison study from the USA and Canada with a case study on binary options in Indonesia

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Safer Communities Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1108/sc-11-2022-0047
A. S. Sudarwanto, Dona Budi Kharisma
{"title":"Law enforcement against investment fraud: a comparison study from the USA and Canada with a case study on binary options in Indonesia","authors":"A. S. Sudarwanto, Dona Budi Kharisma","doi":"10.1108/sc-11-2022-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to propose a law enforcement strategy for investment fraud through comparative studies in the United States of America (USA), Canada and Indonesia, and to identify the factors that cause weak law enforcement on investment fraud with the object of a binary options case study in Indonesia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research is a type of legal research, namely, research based on legal materials (library-based). The legal materials used include primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The approaches used are the statute approach, the case approach and the comparative approach. The data collection technique used in this research is a literature study. The analysis was carried out qualitatively by using an interactive model.\n\n\nFindings\nIn 2022, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) recorded that the total value of public losses because of investment fraud in Indonesia reached 117.4tn IDR. Weak law enforcement is the reason investment fraud thrives in society. Strategies that can be implemented to prevent investment fraud include early detection of new investment fraud modes through the whistleblower program, mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, criminal restitution and improvement of public financial literacy.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study examines the problems of law enforcement against investment fraud with a case study of binary options in Indonesia. A law enforcement strategy is built on identifying issues and adopting law enforcement policies against investment fraud in Canada and the USA.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFor individuals, the results of this research can be used as reading material to increase their understanding of investment fraud. For the government, the results of this study can be a reference in an effort to eradicate the rise of investment fraud cases more effectively and create a safe digital economic space for investors.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe results of this study are expected to be useful in providing recommendations for strategies to strengthen law enforcement against the problems of investment fraud cases so as to form a conducive investment climate in the sense of being safe, comfortable and profitable.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLegal frameworks to prevent investment fraud are rarely discussed. The rise in binary options cases that occur is an indication of weak law enforcement in the investment sector. Therefore, an in-depth study of law enforcement strategies to prevent investment fraud is needed, with comparative studies in the USA, Canada and Indonesia.\n","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-11-2022-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose a law enforcement strategy for investment fraud through comparative studies in the United States of America (USA), Canada and Indonesia, and to identify the factors that cause weak law enforcement on investment fraud with the object of a binary options case study in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach This research is a type of legal research, namely, research based on legal materials (library-based). The legal materials used include primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The approaches used are the statute approach, the case approach and the comparative approach. The data collection technique used in this research is a literature study. The analysis was carried out qualitatively by using an interactive model. Findings In 2022, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) recorded that the total value of public losses because of investment fraud in Indonesia reached 117.4tn IDR. Weak law enforcement is the reason investment fraud thrives in society. Strategies that can be implemented to prevent investment fraud include early detection of new investment fraud modes through the whistleblower program, mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, criminal restitution and improvement of public financial literacy. Research limitations/implications This study examines the problems of law enforcement against investment fraud with a case study of binary options in Indonesia. A law enforcement strategy is built on identifying issues and adopting law enforcement policies against investment fraud in Canada and the USA. Practical implications For individuals, the results of this research can be used as reading material to increase their understanding of investment fraud. For the government, the results of this study can be a reference in an effort to eradicate the rise of investment fraud cases more effectively and create a safe digital economic space for investors. Social implications The results of this study are expected to be useful in providing recommendations for strategies to strengthen law enforcement against the problems of investment fraud cases so as to form a conducive investment climate in the sense of being safe, comfortable and profitable. Originality/value Legal frameworks to prevent investment fraud are rarely discussed. The rise in binary options cases that occur is an indication of weak law enforcement in the investment sector. Therefore, an in-depth study of law enforcement strategies to prevent investment fraud is needed, with comparative studies in the USA, Canada and Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对投资欺诈的执法:美国和加拿大的比较研究与印尼二元期权案例研究
目的本研究旨在通过对美国、加拿大和印度尼西亚的比较研究,提出针对投资欺诈的执法策略,并以印尼的二元期权案例研究为对象,找出导致投资欺诈执法不力的因素,基于法律材料的研究(基于图书馆)。所使用的法律材料包括初级法律材料和次级法律材料。所采用的方法有法规法、案例法和比较法。本研究中使用的数据收集技术是一项文献研究。使用交互模型进行定性分析。调查结果2022年,印尼金融服务管理局(OJK)记录称,印尼因投资欺诈造成的公共损失总额达到117.4万亿印尼盾。执法不力是投资欺诈在社会上盛行的原因。可以实施的防止投资欺诈的战略包括通过举报人计划及早发现新的投资欺诈模式、刑事司法协助、刑事赔偿和提高公共金融知识。研究局限性/含义本研究通过对印度尼西亚二元期权的案例研究,探讨了打击投资欺诈的执法问题。执法策略建立在识别问题和采取执法政策打击加拿大和美国投资欺诈的基础上。实际意义对于个人来说,这项研究的结果可以用作阅读材料,以提高他们对投资欺诈的理解。对于政府来说,这项研究的结果可以作为参考,以更有效地根除投资欺诈案件的上升,并为投资者创造一个安全的数字经济空间。社会影响这项研究的结果有望为加强针对投资欺诈案件问题的执法策略提供建议,从而形成安全、舒适和有利可图的有利投资环境。独创性/价值防止投资欺诈的法律框架很少被讨论。二元期权案件的增加表明投资行业执法不力。因此,需要深入研究防止投资欺诈的执法策略,并在美国、加拿大和印度尼西亚进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Navigating perilous seas: unmasking online banking frauds, perceived usefulness, fear of cybercrime and distrust in online banking Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and terrorism: a rapid evidence assessment of risk and vulnerability factors, and implications for intervention Assaults in public places: interesting numbers from a North American university city Government’s failure to protect its citizens against nomadic herders’ aggression: a tacit permission for self-defense in Plateau State, Nigeria Hate-motivated crimes in Brazil: an overview of crimes against LGBTQI+ people
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1