To Boldly Go Where No Device Has Gone Before: Specimen Self-Collection for the Clinical Laboratory

Ria C. Fyffe-Freil, Paul J. Jannetto, Patrick M. Vanderboom
{"title":"To Boldly Go Where No Device Has Gone Before: Specimen Self-Collection for the Clinical Laboratory","authors":"Ria C. Fyffe-Freil,&nbsp;Paul J. Jannetto,&nbsp;Patrick M. Vanderboom","doi":"10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The indications for and interest in self-collection of specimens, such as blood, saliva, urine, stool, and anogenital specimens, for clinical laboratory testing are vast (especially in the post-pandemic era). A need for innovation, combined with convenience for patients, clinicians, and researchers, opened the doors for a wave of self-collection devices to flood the market in early 2020. Many of the devices discussed in this review are registered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or have emergency use authorization for diagnostic testing in clinical laboratories. While many self-collection devices were evaluated for collection of specimens for SARS-CoV-2 testing, they can be used to collect samples for many other serologic, molecular, or other diagnostic methods following completion of necessary laboratory validation studies. The advantages of these devices, such as convenience and access, must be balanced with added cost, challenges of specimen stability, and manual processing in the laboratory, all of which are discussed in this review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39211,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Newsletter","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196439923000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The indications for and interest in self-collection of specimens, such as blood, saliva, urine, stool, and anogenital specimens, for clinical laboratory testing are vast (especially in the post-pandemic era). A need for innovation, combined with convenience for patients, clinicians, and researchers, opened the doors for a wave of self-collection devices to flood the market in early 2020. Many of the devices discussed in this review are registered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or have emergency use authorization for diagnostic testing in clinical laboratories. While many self-collection devices were evaluated for collection of specimens for SARS-CoV-2 testing, they can be used to collect samples for many other serologic, molecular, or other diagnostic methods following completion of necessary laboratory validation studies. The advantages of these devices, such as convenience and access, must be balanced with added cost, challenges of specimen stability, and manual processing in the laboratory, all of which are discussed in this review.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大胆地去从未有过的地方:临床实验室的标本自行采集
自我收集标本(如血液、唾液、尿液、粪便和肛门生殖器标本)用于临床实验室检测的适应症和兴趣是广泛的(特别是在大流行后时代)。对创新的需求,加上对患者、临床医生和研究人员的便利,为2020年初一波自我收集设备涌入市场打开了大门。本综述中讨论的许多设备已在美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)注册,或在临床实验室获得紧急使用授权进行诊断测试。虽然对许多自我采集设备进行了评估,用于收集用于SARS-CoV-2检测的标本,但在完成必要的实验室验证研究后,它们可用于收集用于许多其他血清学、分子或其他诊断方法的样本。这些设备的优点,如方便和使用,必须与增加的成本、标本稳定性的挑战和实验室的人工处理相平衡,所有这些都在本文中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Highly respected for its ability to keep pace with advances in this fast moving field, Clinical Microbiology Newsletter has quickly become a “benchmark” for anyone in the lab. Twice a month the newsletter reports on changes that affect your work, ranging from articles on new diagnostic techniques, to surveys of how readers handle blood cultures, to editorials questioning common procedures and suggesting new ones.
期刊最新文献
Current scenario and future prospect of scabies treatment: A comprehensive review “Eye see worms on the down Loa”: A case study of microfilarial co-infection General perspectives on dengue fever Navigating the new norm: The FDA's final rule on laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and its impact on clinical laboratory operations Neisseria meningitidis pyelonephritis: A rare and unusual presentation of an established pathogen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1