{"title":"LA CIUDADANÍA EN MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO: EL LIBRE EXAMEN Y LA PARTICIPACIÓN POLÍTICA","authors":"Emanuel José Maroco dos Santos","doi":"10.5216/PHI.V22I1.44198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unamuno, like all the great classic Western thinkers, is eternally relevant to the present time. His reflections concerning what a democracy should be are in this sense an expression of the timelessness of his political thought. Certainly the question of what democratic citizenship is and involves is motivating the thinking of many of today’s philosophers; it is also no less certain that no other author has been so consistent in taking to the limit the relation between the idea of that concept and its implementation in his civic life. Unamuno – as an irascible “intellectual-politician” in self-exile in Paris owing to his confrontation with the Miguel Primo de Rivera dictatorship, the monarchy and the king– is the highest example of how current democracy and citizenship should be understood and practised in terms of political intervention established on free examination of conscience. And it is precisely here where the influence of German liberal Protestantism played as decisive role in his intellectual formation, especially for an author so adept in heresy as deconstruction of orthodoxies and dogmas that disallow individual thought in its freedom and autonomy.","PeriodicalId":30368,"journal":{"name":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","volume":"22 1","pages":"37-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/PHI.V22I1.44198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unamuno, like all the great classic Western thinkers, is eternally relevant to the present time. His reflections concerning what a democracy should be are in this sense an expression of the timelessness of his political thought. Certainly the question of what democratic citizenship is and involves is motivating the thinking of many of today’s philosophers; it is also no less certain that no other author has been so consistent in taking to the limit the relation between the idea of that concept and its implementation in his civic life. Unamuno – as an irascible “intellectual-politician” in self-exile in Paris owing to his confrontation with the Miguel Primo de Rivera dictatorship, the monarchy and the king– is the highest example of how current democracy and citizenship should be understood and practised in terms of political intervention established on free examination of conscience. And it is precisely here where the influence of German liberal Protestantism played as decisive role in his intellectual formation, especially for an author so adept in heresy as deconstruction of orthodoxies and dogmas that disallow individual thought in its freedom and autonomy.
Unamuno,就像所有伟大的西方经典思想家一样,与当今时代永远相关。从这个意义上说,他对民主应该是什么的思考表达了他的政治思想的永恒性。当然,民主公民身份是什么以及涉及什么的问题激发了当今许多哲学家的思考;同样可以肯定的是,没有其他作者如此始终如一地将这一概念的理念及其在公民生活中的实施之间的关系发挥到极限。Unamuno是一位脾气暴躁的“知识分子政治家”,由于与Miguel Primo de Rivera独裁政权、君主制和国王的对抗而流亡巴黎,他是当前民主和公民身份应如何在建立在良心自由检查基础上的政治干预中得到理解和实践的最高例子。正是在这里,德国自由主义新教的影响在他的思想形成中发挥了决定性作用,尤其是对于一位如此擅长异端的作家来说,比如解构正统和教条,这些正统和教条不允许个人思想的自由和自主权。