Urban Space and Everyday Adaptations

Q4 Engineering Spool Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.47982/spool.2022.2.01
Mathilda Rosengren, Franziska Polleter, Josefine Sarkez-Knudsen, Flavia Alice Mameli
{"title":"Urban Space and Everyday Adaptations","authors":"Mathilda Rosengren, Franziska Polleter, Josefine Sarkez-Knudsen, Flavia Alice Mameli","doi":"10.47982/spool.2022.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses Jem Bendell’s concept of “deep adaptation” in the Anthropocene through the lens of everyday urban practices in contemporary Northern Europe. It proposes that this “deep adaptation” should be defined less in relation to a socio-ecological “collapse” and more through everyday occurrences in present-day urban environments. \nEntering into a critical conversation with Bendell’s conceptual “4 Rs” framework, the paper draws on primary data from several cities in Sweden and Germany to show how, in practice, resilience can be found in the “quiet activism” of leisure gardeners; how ingrained notions of restricted land use may be relinquished through “commoning” urban space; how novel constellations of co-living restores old ideas of intragenerational urban cohabitation; and, finally, how a path to reconciliation may be articulated through an ontological shift away from an anthropocentric urban planning, towards one that recognises other-than-human beings as legitimate dwellers in the urban landscape. \nAccounting for urbanities of enmeshed societal, ecological, and spatial trajectories, the paper reveals an inhibiting anthropocentrism in Bendell’s framework and ultimately points to how his “creatively constructed hope” for the future may be found, not in an impending global collapse, but in everyday adaptations and embodied acts that stretch far beyond the human.","PeriodicalId":52253,"journal":{"name":"Spool","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spool","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2022.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses Jem Bendell’s concept of “deep adaptation” in the Anthropocene through the lens of everyday urban practices in contemporary Northern Europe. It proposes that this “deep adaptation” should be defined less in relation to a socio-ecological “collapse” and more through everyday occurrences in present-day urban environments. Entering into a critical conversation with Bendell’s conceptual “4 Rs” framework, the paper draws on primary data from several cities in Sweden and Germany to show how, in practice, resilience can be found in the “quiet activism” of leisure gardeners; how ingrained notions of restricted land use may be relinquished through “commoning” urban space; how novel constellations of co-living restores old ideas of intragenerational urban cohabitation; and, finally, how a path to reconciliation may be articulated through an ontological shift away from an anthropocentric urban planning, towards one that recognises other-than-human beings as legitimate dwellers in the urban landscape. Accounting for urbanities of enmeshed societal, ecological, and spatial trajectories, the paper reveals an inhibiting anthropocentrism in Bendell’s framework and ultimately points to how his “creatively constructed hope” for the future may be found, not in an impending global collapse, but in everyday adaptations and embodied acts that stretch far beyond the human.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市空间和日常适应
本文通过当代北欧的日常城市实践,阐述了Jem Bendell在人类世中的“深度适应”概念。它建议,这种“深度适应”的定义不应该与社会生态“崩溃”有关,而应该更多地通过当今城市环境中的日常事件来定义。与本德尔的概念“4r”框架进行了批判性的对话,论文利用了瑞典和德国几个城市的原始数据,展示了在实践中,如何在休闲园丁的“安静的激进主义”中找到弹性;如何通过“共用”城市空间来放弃限制土地使用的根深蒂固的观念;新颖的共同生活星座如何恢复代际城市同居的旧观念;最后,如何通过从以人类为中心的城市规划的本体论转变,向将非人类视为城市景观中的合法居民的城市规划转变,来阐明一条和解之路。考虑到城市交织的社会、生态和空间轨迹,这篇论文揭示了本德尔框架中的抑制人类中心主义,并最终指出他对未来的“创造性构建的希望”是如何被发现的,而不是在即将到来的全球崩溃中,而是在日常适应和超越人类的具体行为中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spool
Spool Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing Sustainable Approaches in Architecture by Means of Design-to-Robotic-Production In-Situ vs. Prefab 3D Printing Considerations for CO2-free Pop-up Architecture The migrating walls An interactive simulation of control and coordination strategies for swarms of autonomous construction robots Dialogues on Architecture #6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1