Self-Regulated Learning in the IB Diploma Programme: A qualitative comparison of strategy use by IB Diploma students with learning difficulties and those with a history of high achievement

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in International Education Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1177/14752409221122009
Sandra Forrest
{"title":"Self-Regulated Learning in the IB Diploma Programme: A qualitative comparison of strategy use by IB Diploma students with learning difficulties and those with a history of high achievement","authors":"Sandra Forrest","doi":"10.1177/14752409221122009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation set out to explore the self-regulated learning strategies implemented by high-achieving International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) students and those with learning difficulties in a context in which teachers were developing their practice to better align with IB philosophy. Specifically, I aimed to determine whether the strategies used by students in the two categories differed and, if so, what accounted for these differences. The sample included four DP students with diagnosed learning difficulties and six high-achieving DP students. Methods included collecting samples of independent work that reflected their strategy use; accompanying written reflections; and semi-structured interviews utilising a combination of stimulated recall and open-ended questions. Results suggest that only slight differences existed in the number and type of strategies used by participants in each category, but there were some important differences in strategy quality. These differences appeared to be related to the epistemic awareness students demonstrated, rather than their categorisation as having learning difficulties or being high-achieving. Although the IB Diploma Programme is widely considered an appropriate secondary programme for high-achieving students, its potential to enhance self-regulated learning suggests this programme may also be an appropriate option for some university-bound students with learning difficulties. As the literature review for this investigation uncovered only one previous study pertaining to IB Diploma Programme students with learning difficulties, this is a significant contribution to knowledge with implications for admissions as well as teaching and learning in IB schools. The investigation also indicates that epistemic awareness may play a more significant role in self-regulated learning than contemporary theories suggest.","PeriodicalId":45854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in International Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"139 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14752409221122009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigation set out to explore the self-regulated learning strategies implemented by high-achieving International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) students and those with learning difficulties in a context in which teachers were developing their practice to better align with IB philosophy. Specifically, I aimed to determine whether the strategies used by students in the two categories differed and, if so, what accounted for these differences. The sample included four DP students with diagnosed learning difficulties and six high-achieving DP students. Methods included collecting samples of independent work that reflected their strategy use; accompanying written reflections; and semi-structured interviews utilising a combination of stimulated recall and open-ended questions. Results suggest that only slight differences existed in the number and type of strategies used by participants in each category, but there were some important differences in strategy quality. These differences appeared to be related to the epistemic awareness students demonstrated, rather than their categorisation as having learning difficulties or being high-achieving. Although the IB Diploma Programme is widely considered an appropriate secondary programme for high-achieving students, its potential to enhance self-regulated learning suggests this programme may also be an appropriate option for some university-bound students with learning difficulties. As the literature review for this investigation uncovered only one previous study pertaining to IB Diploma Programme students with learning difficulties, this is a significant contribution to knowledge with implications for admissions as well as teaching and learning in IB schools. The investigation also indicates that epistemic awareness may play a more significant role in self-regulated learning than contemporary theories suggest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IB文凭课程中的自律学习:有学习困难和有高成就史的IB文凭学生策略使用的定性比较
本调查旨在探索成绩优异的国际文凭课程(IB)学生和有学习困难的学生在教师发展实践以更好地符合IB哲学的背景下实施的自我调节学习策略。具体来说,我的目的是确定这两类学生使用的策略是否不同,如果是,是什么导致了这些差异。样本包括四名被诊断为学习困难的DP学生和六名成绩优异的DP学生。方法包括收集反映其策略使用情况的独立工作样本;随附的书面反思;以及采用刺激回忆和开放式问题相结合的半结构化访谈。结果表明,每个类别的参与者使用的策略的数量和类型只有细微的差异,但在策略质量方面存在一些重要的差异。这些差异似乎与学生表现出的认知意识有关,而不是将其归类为有学习困难或成绩优异。尽管IB文凭课程被广泛认为是适合成绩优异学生的中等课程,但其增强自我调节学习的潜力表明,该课程也可能是一些有学习困难的大学学生的合适选择。由于本次调查的文献综述只发现了之前一项与IB文凭课程有学习困难的学生有关的研究,这是对知识的重大贡献,对IB学校的招生以及教学都有影响。研究还表明,认知意识在自我调节学习中可能比当代理论所暗示的更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in International Education
Journal of Research in International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in International Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal in international education for schools, examiners and higher education institutions throughout the world. The Journal of Research in International Education seeks to advance the understanding and significance of international education. It sets out to undertake a rigorous consideration of the educational implications of the fundamental relationship between human unity and human diversity that ''education for international understanding'' requires. The JRIE encourages an approach to research in international education that will close the gap between the well established emergent theory and diverse practice throughout the world. In this context, international education is concerned with the promotion of education for international understanding and human rights, and may include peace education, global education and intercultural education. Authors may address, for example, the curriculum, institutional concerns, the history of education, policy and pedagogy at all levels.
期刊最新文献
Interculturalism in student and teacher understandings of global citizenship education in three International Baccalaureate international schools Becoming a new type of teacher: The case of experienced British-trained educators transitioning to the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme abroad Characteristics of Effective International School Teachers: A Systematic Review of the Literature Professional Learning in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Exploring associations between teacher perceptions of working conditions and immediate professional plans at a Chinese internationalised school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1