Pursuing Universalism Through the Particular: Zionism and Transnational Modernism in Arieli's "In the Light of Venus"

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.1353/sho.2021.0025
P. Hollander
{"title":"Pursuing Universalism Through the Particular: Zionism and Transnational Modernism in Arieli's \"In the Light of Venus\"","authors":"P. Hollander","doi":"10.1353/sho.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Two methodologies dominate recent scholarship on early twentieth-century Hebrew literature—discourse analysis and the transnational approach. These approaches' proponents disagree about this literature's political character. While pointing to how the discourse analysts' work accords more effectively with historical research and how early twentieth-century Hebrew literature can be better understood in relationship to its political function, this article stresses how scholarship employing a transnational approach nonetheless contributes to more effective understanding of this literature. In fact, through analysis of Levi Aryeh Arieli's 1911 novella In the Light of Venus, this article will explore how the national, the transnational, the aesthetic, and the political are interwoven in early twentieth-century Hebrew literature, with these elements finding variant expression in different Hebrew works, even the works of individual authors. Despite this crisscrossing, Zionist objectives proved highly significant to Hebrew writers looking to contribute to the development of textual and spatial locations where Jews, especially Jewish men, could fully express their cosmopolitan character and universal beliefs and desires. Thus, while Arieli draws on the transnational literary milieu to aesthetically depict the modern individual's quest for religious experience, his engagement with gender and sexuality to promote Jewish gender and sexual norms considered best able to aid in promotion of Zionism aims in Palestine constitutes his novella's center of gravity. Such a reading offers a new way to look at Arieli and his literary work, as well as early twentieth-century Hebrew literary works with overlapping aesthetic and political aims.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"120 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Two methodologies dominate recent scholarship on early twentieth-century Hebrew literature—discourse analysis and the transnational approach. These approaches' proponents disagree about this literature's political character. While pointing to how the discourse analysts' work accords more effectively with historical research and how early twentieth-century Hebrew literature can be better understood in relationship to its political function, this article stresses how scholarship employing a transnational approach nonetheless contributes to more effective understanding of this literature. In fact, through analysis of Levi Aryeh Arieli's 1911 novella In the Light of Venus, this article will explore how the national, the transnational, the aesthetic, and the political are interwoven in early twentieth-century Hebrew literature, with these elements finding variant expression in different Hebrew works, even the works of individual authors. Despite this crisscrossing, Zionist objectives proved highly significant to Hebrew writers looking to contribute to the development of textual and spatial locations where Jews, especially Jewish men, could fully express their cosmopolitan character and universal beliefs and desires. Thus, while Arieli draws on the transnational literary milieu to aesthetically depict the modern individual's quest for religious experience, his engagement with gender and sexuality to promote Jewish gender and sexual norms considered best able to aid in promotion of Zionism aims in Palestine constitutes his novella's center of gravity. Such a reading offers a new way to look at Arieli and his literary work, as well as early twentieth-century Hebrew literary works with overlapping aesthetic and political aims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在特殊中追求普世主义:阿里埃利《在金星的光下》中的犹太复国主义与跨国现代主义
摘要:在二十世纪早期希伯来文学研究中,两种研究方法占主导地位——话语分析和跨国研究方法。这些方法的支持者不同意这种文学的政治特征。在指出话语分析家的工作如何更有效地与历史研究相一致,以及如何更好地理解20世纪早期希伯来文学与其政治功能的关系时,本文强调了采用跨国方法的学术如何有助于更有效地理解这些文学。事实上,本文将通过对Levi Aryeh Arieli 1911年的中篇小说《维纳斯之光》的分析,探讨民族、跨国、美学和政治是如何在20世纪早期的希伯来文学中交织在一起的,这些元素在不同的希伯来作品中,甚至在个人作者的作品中都有不同的表达。尽管如此,犹太复国主义的目标被证明对希伯来作家来说非常重要,他们希望为犹太人,尤其是犹太人,能够充分表达他们的世界主义特征和普遍信仰和愿望的文本和空间位置的发展做出贡献。因此,当Arieli利用跨国文学环境来美学地描绘现代个人对宗教体验的追求时,他对性别和性的参与,以促进犹太人的性别和性规范,被认为是最能帮助促进巴勒斯坦犹太复国主义目标的,构成了他的中篇小说的重心。这样的阅读提供了一种新的方式来看待阿里埃利和他的文学作品,以及20世纪早期具有重叠美学和政治目标的希伯来文学作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Ladin in Lineage: Through the Doors of Jewish Gendered Life at Yeshiva University's Stern College for Women Un-Settled Questions: Frontier Logic and Satmar Political Theology A Specter Haunting Holocaust Studies: The Muselmann Did Jews Die as Muslims in Auschwitz? Specters of the Muselmann Transmatriation? Avishag the Shunammite in Three Contemporary Israeli Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1