ESG Mutual Fund Voting on Executive Compensation Shareholder Proposals

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Management Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.2308/jmar-2022-036
Shane S. Dikolli, M. M. Frank, Zhe Guo, Luann J. Lynch
{"title":"ESG Mutual Fund Voting on Executive Compensation Shareholder Proposals","authors":"Shane S. Dikolli, M. M. Frank, Zhe Guo, Luann J. Lynch","doi":"10.2308/jmar-2022-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We investigate how mutual funds with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives vote on shareholder proposals related to executive compensation. Using a sample of 94,695 votes by 2,354 mutual funds from 2012 to 2021, we find ESG funds are 9.4 percent more likely than non-ESG funds to vote in favor of such proposals, and the likelihood increases to 19.2 percent for proposals aligning executive compensation with environmental and social (ES) objectives. ESG funds are also 14.9 percent more likely to support proposals to improve transparency, but only 7.0 percent more likely to support proposals about redesigning compensation. Our results are consistent with ESG funds perceiving greater net benefits from supporting shareholder compensation proposals, particularly those related to ES objectives and transparency. Additionally, funds committed to ESG objectives in regulatory filings are more likely to support such proposals than fund families that voluntarily signed the United Nations’ Principles of Responsible Investment.\n JEL Classifications: G23; G30; M12; M14.","PeriodicalId":46474,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2022-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate how mutual funds with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives vote on shareholder proposals related to executive compensation. Using a sample of 94,695 votes by 2,354 mutual funds from 2012 to 2021, we find ESG funds are 9.4 percent more likely than non-ESG funds to vote in favor of such proposals, and the likelihood increases to 19.2 percent for proposals aligning executive compensation with environmental and social (ES) objectives. ESG funds are also 14.9 percent more likely to support proposals to improve transparency, but only 7.0 percent more likely to support proposals about redesigning compensation. Our results are consistent with ESG funds perceiving greater net benefits from supporting shareholder compensation proposals, particularly those related to ES objectives and transparency. Additionally, funds committed to ESG objectives in regulatory filings are more likely to support such proposals than fund families that voluntarily signed the United Nations’ Principles of Responsible Investment. JEL Classifications: G23; G30; M12; M14.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG共同基金对高管薪酬股东提案的投票
我们研究了具有环境、社会和治理(ESG)目标的共同基金如何对与高管薪酬相关的股东提案进行投票。利用2012年至2021年2354家共同基金的94695张选票样本,我们发现ESG基金比非ESG基金投票支持此类提案的可能性高出9.4%,而将高管薪酬与环境和社会(ES)目标相结合的提案的可能性增加到19.2%。ESG基金支持提高透明度提案的可能性也高出14.9%,但支持重新设计薪酬提案的可能性仅高出7.0%。我们的研究结果与ESG基金认为,支持股东薪酬提案(尤其是与ESG目标和透明度相关的提案)会带来更大的净收益一致。此外,与自愿签署联合国负责任投资原则的基金相比,在监管文件中承诺实现ESG目标的基金更有可能支持此类提案。JEL分类:G23;G30;M12;M14。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Management Accounting Research (JMAR) is to advance the theory and practice of management accounting through publication of high-quality applied and theoretical research, using any well-executed research method. JMAR serves the global community of scholars and practitioners whose work impacts or is informed by the role that accounting information plays in decision-making and performance measurement within organizations. Settings may include profit and not-for profit organizations, service, retail and manufacturing organizations and domestic, foreign, and multinational firms. JMAR furthermore seeks to advance an understanding of management accounting in its broader context, such as issues related to the interface between internal and external reporting or taxation. New theories, topical areas, and research methods, as well as original research with novel implications to improve practice and disseminate the best managerial accounting practices are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Digital Anxiety in the Finance Function: Consequences and Mitigating Factors Institutional Theory and Hybrid Accounting and Control Systems Superior-Subordinate Divergence in Controllability Judgments The Influence of Controllability and Outcome Valence on Cost-Shifting The Effects of Span of Control and Temporal Disaggregation of Performance Reports on Discretionary Performance Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1