Mapping the frontiers of private property in New South Wales, Australia

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.1111/1745-5871.12581
Dallas Rogers, Andrew Leach, Jasper Ludewig, Amelia Thorpe, Laurence Troy
{"title":"Mapping the frontiers of private property in New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Dallas Rogers,&nbsp;Andrew Leach,&nbsp;Jasper Ludewig,&nbsp;Amelia Thorpe,&nbsp;Laurence Troy","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article addresses the process and patterns by which private property has been applied on the Australian continent. Alongside both lease-holdings that are limited by term or perpetual and squatting practices, identifying and documenting private property in both individual cases and in aggregate over a large geography offers a compelling approximation of the appearance and spread of British–Australian settlement. Plots and patterns of private land ownership can be read in relation to other forms of land use and tenure each subject to specific historical legal instruments and definitions. We explore how, in particular, the first-generation alienation of private property might be constructed, represented, and theorised using a critical approach to GIS tools and practices. What technical considerations are required to identify the extent of a site and map its transfer into private hands? How far can the process of mapping the initial alienation of parcels of Crown land over time expose legacies of colonial practices in present-day methods and serve as a testbed to generate other layers that capture, for instance, patterns of informal privatisation or interact with other phenomena—most notably that of frontier violence—that likewise occur on land, in time? Such work can be located among those wrestling with problems of mapping colonial land occupation with technologies that share a heritage with the surveying tools that allowed that same acquisition and can enhance a critical approach to GIS in relation to appropriation and dispossession of Aboriginal land.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"63 2","pages":"236-248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the process and patterns by which private property has been applied on the Australian continent. Alongside both lease-holdings that are limited by term or perpetual and squatting practices, identifying and documenting private property in both individual cases and in aggregate over a large geography offers a compelling approximation of the appearance and spread of British–Australian settlement. Plots and patterns of private land ownership can be read in relation to other forms of land use and tenure each subject to specific historical legal instruments and definitions. We explore how, in particular, the first-generation alienation of private property might be constructed, represented, and theorised using a critical approach to GIS tools and practices. What technical considerations are required to identify the extent of a site and map its transfer into private hands? How far can the process of mapping the initial alienation of parcels of Crown land over time expose legacies of colonial practices in present-day methods and serve as a testbed to generate other layers that capture, for instance, patterns of informal privatisation or interact with other phenomena—most notably that of frontier violence—that likewise occur on land, in time? Such work can be located among those wrestling with problems of mapping colonial land occupation with technologies that share a heritage with the surveying tools that allowed that same acquisition and can enhance a critical approach to GIS in relation to appropriation and dispossession of Aboriginal land.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制澳大利亚新南威尔士州私人财产的边界
本文论述了私有财产在澳大利亚大陆的应用过程和模式。除了受期限或永久限制的租赁所有权和侵占行为之外,在一个大的地理区域内,识别和记录个人和总体的私人财产,提供了一个令人信服的近似英澳定居点的出现和传播。私人土地所有权的地块和模式可以与其他形式的土地使用和所有权联系起来解读,每一种形式都受特定的历史法律文书和定义的约束。我们特别探讨了如何使用GIS工具和实践的关键方法来构建、表示和理论化私有财产的第一代异化。在确定一幅土地的面积和将其转让给私人手中时,需要考虑哪些技术因素?随着时间的推移,绘制皇家土地最初异化的过程能在多大程度上揭示当今方法中殖民实践的遗产,并作为一个试验台,以产生其他层面,例如,非正式私有化的模式或与其他现象(最明显的是边境暴力)的相互作用,这些现象同样发生在土地上,随着时间的推移?这种工作可以属于那些努力解决殖民地土地占领测绘问题的工作,这些问题所使用的技术与能够取得同样土地的测量工具具有共同的传统,并且可以加强地理信息系统在占有和剥夺土著土地方面的关键方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Undisciplining political geography Paying attention to scale for just and effective sustainability governance Beyond green. The social life of Australian nature. Lesley Head, Melbourne University Press, 2025, 224 pp. ISBN 9780522880632 (pb) Issue Information China’s digitalised water governance and authoritarian environmentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1