Effects of Personalized Aerobic-Exercise and Resistance-Training Prescriptions on College Students with Anxiety During the COVID-19

Yuanhui Zhao, Wen Wang, Fang Gao, Bowen Cui, Chun Hu, Wenlang Yu, Mengdie Wang, Hong Ren
{"title":"Effects of Personalized Aerobic-Exercise and Resistance-Training Prescriptions on College Students with Anxiety During the COVID-19","authors":"Yuanhui Zhao, Wen Wang, Fang Gao, Bowen Cui, Chun Hu, Wenlang Yu, Mengdie Wang, Hong Ren","doi":"10.18122/ijpah.020103.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has seriously increased anxiety prevalence among the public, including Chinese college students. However, \n many exercises cannot be performed as usual under the stay-at-home order. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare \n the effect of personalized individual aerobic-exercise and resistance-training prescriptions on anxiety in college students \n during the COVID-19. This was a 12-week three-arm randomized control trial using the intention-to-treat principle. Sixty-six \n college students with anxiety were recruited and randomized into aerobic-exercise (AE), resistance-training (RT), and \n health-education group (HE). AE and RT groups also received health education. Measures on anxiety and physical activity \n included Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Chinese College Students Mental Health Scale - Anxiety Subscale (CCSMHS-AS) and \n International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All data were collected at the baseline, 4, 8, 12 weeks and \n 4-week post-intervention. All participants completed the intervention and measurements. The mean (SD) of SAS, CCSMHS-AS score \n and physical activity was 56.36 (5.63), 19.27 (4.56), 1306.57 (1421.19) (met-min/week). After the intervention, 78.79% of \n anxiety participants improved from anxiety to “normal”. Participants in all groups showed a statistically and clinically \n significant improvement after 12-week intervention (p < 0.001). Moreover, such improvement was well-maintained in RT and HE \n group as there were no significant differences in SAS and CCSMHS-AS at 4-week post-intervention compared to 12 weeks (p > 0.05). \n However, the SAS score of participants in AE group showed a significant increase during the 4 weeks after intervention \n (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the effect of AE and RT on anxiety at each time-point (p > 0.05). \n PA of participants in AE and RT group represented a significant improvement at 4-week post-intervention compared to baseline \n (p < 0.01). Personalized individual aerobic-exercise and resistance-training combined with health-education resulted in a \n similar effect on reducing anxiety and improving physical activity, and the effect was better than health education alone. \n Furthermore, the effect of resistance-training and health-education on reducing anxiety was more stable than that of \n aerobic-exercise. We recommended 45- to 60-minute home-based individual exercise (including 30- to 40-minute main exercise) \n with progressive moderate-to-high intensity, 3 times/week for at least 12 weeks for those students with anxiety during the \n COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":73469,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical activity and health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical activity and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.020103.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has seriously increased anxiety prevalence among the public, including Chinese college students. However, many exercises cannot be performed as usual under the stay-at-home order. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of personalized individual aerobic-exercise and resistance-training prescriptions on anxiety in college students during the COVID-19. This was a 12-week three-arm randomized control trial using the intention-to-treat principle. Sixty-six college students with anxiety were recruited and randomized into aerobic-exercise (AE), resistance-training (RT), and health-education group (HE). AE and RT groups also received health education. Measures on anxiety and physical activity included Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Chinese College Students Mental Health Scale - Anxiety Subscale (CCSMHS-AS) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All data were collected at the baseline, 4, 8, 12 weeks and 4-week post-intervention. All participants completed the intervention and measurements. The mean (SD) of SAS, CCSMHS-AS score and physical activity was 56.36 (5.63), 19.27 (4.56), 1306.57 (1421.19) (met-min/week). After the intervention, 78.79% of anxiety participants improved from anxiety to “normal”. Participants in all groups showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement after 12-week intervention (p < 0.001). Moreover, such improvement was well-maintained in RT and HE group as there were no significant differences in SAS and CCSMHS-AS at 4-week post-intervention compared to 12 weeks (p > 0.05). However, the SAS score of participants in AE group showed a significant increase during the 4 weeks after intervention (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the effect of AE and RT on anxiety at each time-point (p > 0.05). PA of participants in AE and RT group represented a significant improvement at 4-week post-intervention compared to baseline (p < 0.01). Personalized individual aerobic-exercise and resistance-training combined with health-education resulted in a similar effect on reducing anxiety and improving physical activity, and the effect was better than health education alone. Furthermore, the effect of resistance-training and health-education on reducing anxiety was more stable than that of aerobic-exercise. We recommended 45- to 60-minute home-based individual exercise (including 30- to 40-minute main exercise) with progressive moderate-to-high intensity, 3 times/week for at least 12 weeks for those students with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性化有氧运动和抗阻训练处方对新冠肺炎期间焦虑大学生的影响
新冠肺炎疫情严重加剧了包括中国大学生在内的公众的焦虑情绪。然而,在居家命令下,许多运动不能像往常一样进行。本研究的目的是评估和比较个性化个体有氧运动和抗阻训练处方对COVID-19期间大学生焦虑的影响。这是一项为期12周的三组随机对照试验,采用意向治疗原则。招募66名焦虑大学生,随机分为有氧运动组(AE)、阻力训练组(RT)和健康教育组(HE)。AE组和RT组均接受健康教育。焦虑与体育活动的测量方法包括:Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)、中国大学生心理健康量表-焦虑子量表(CCSMHS-AS)和国际体育活动问卷-简表(IPAQ-SF)。在干预后的基线、4周、8周、12周和4周收集所有数据。所有参与者都完成了干预和测量。SAS、CCSMHS-AS评分和体力活动的平均(SD)分别为56.36(5.63)、19.27(4.56)、1306.57 (1421.19)(met-min/week)。干预后,78.79%的焦虑参与者由焦虑改善为“正常”。干预12周后,各组患者均有统计学和临床显著改善(p < 0.001)。此外,这种改善在RT和HE组中得到很好的维持,因为干预后4周的SAS和CCSMHS-AS与干预后12周相比无显著差异(p > 0.05)。而AE组受试者的SAS评分在干预后4周内显著升高(p < 0.05)。AE和RT在各时间点对焦虑的影响差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。AE组和RT组的PA在干预后4周较基线有显著改善(p < 0.01)。个性化的个体有氧运动和抗阻训练结合健康教育在减少焦虑和改善身体活动方面的效果相似,且效果优于单独的健康教育。此外,抗阻训练和健康教育对减轻焦虑的效果比有氧运动更稳定。我们建议在COVID-19大流行期间焦虑的学生进行45至60分钟的家庭个人锻炼(包括30至40分钟的主要锻炼),逐步进行中至高强度,每周3次,持续至少12周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attitude and Attitudinal Structures Toward Physical Education and Their Influences on Physical Activity Behavior Ways to Improve Uptake of Tier 2 Weight Management Programmes in BAME Communities in Medway A Longitudinal Look at Student Attitude, Perceived Competence, and Fitness Test Performance of Elementary Students The Association of Virtual Exercise Classes and Well-Being During COVID-19 Among University Employees Student Attitude, Perceived Competence, and Fitness Test Performance Over Two School Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1