Social change in developmental times? On ‘changeability’ and the uneven timings of child welfare interventions

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Time & Society Pub Date : 2020-07-17 DOI:10.1177/0961463X20938590
Z. Knezevic
{"title":"Social change in developmental times? On ‘changeability’ and the uneven timings of child welfare interventions","authors":"Z. Knezevic","doi":"10.1177/0961463X20938590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While temporality has been addressed in the context of child welfare, the temporal dimensions of differentiation and othering remain unacknowledged. This article draws on material from a Swedish child welfare agency and is theoretically inspired by postcolonial and queer theories and critical childhood studies. It is based on an analytical juxtaposition of care order applications recommending immediate child welfare interventions versus interventions that are recommended after long ongoing assessments. Such recommendations are addressed as unequal in terms of timing. The article discusses temporal themes related to permanency versus temporary, which guide assessments of changeability. I show how immediate interventions respond to chronicity—the temporality of incurability, permanency, and underdevelopment. However, social problems in long ongoing assessments are assessed as permanent only after long ongoing observations or passage of time. The article discusses how ideas about change reproduce wider societal and intersecting inequalities. This becomes visible when considering time as allocated to parents and their potential to bring about change. I argue that even though permanency differs from chronicity, it still limits a discussion about change as societal, and the detection of problems remains within a developmentalist and neoliberal framework. In the concluding remarks, I offer an alternative reading of allocated time that can manoeuvre developmentalist logics, while balancing responsibilisation between the individual and the society.","PeriodicalId":47347,"journal":{"name":"Time & Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"1040 - 1060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0961463X20938590","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20938590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While temporality has been addressed in the context of child welfare, the temporal dimensions of differentiation and othering remain unacknowledged. This article draws on material from a Swedish child welfare agency and is theoretically inspired by postcolonial and queer theories and critical childhood studies. It is based on an analytical juxtaposition of care order applications recommending immediate child welfare interventions versus interventions that are recommended after long ongoing assessments. Such recommendations are addressed as unequal in terms of timing. The article discusses temporal themes related to permanency versus temporary, which guide assessments of changeability. I show how immediate interventions respond to chronicity—the temporality of incurability, permanency, and underdevelopment. However, social problems in long ongoing assessments are assessed as permanent only after long ongoing observations or passage of time. The article discusses how ideas about change reproduce wider societal and intersecting inequalities. This becomes visible when considering time as allocated to parents and their potential to bring about change. I argue that even though permanency differs from chronicity, it still limits a discussion about change as societal, and the detection of problems remains within a developmentalist and neoliberal framework. In the concluding remarks, I offer an alternative reading of allocated time that can manoeuvre developmentalist logics, while balancing responsibilisation between the individual and the society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展时期的社会变化?关于“可变性”和儿童福利干预的不均匀时间
虽然在儿童福利的背景下讨论了时间性,但分化和其他化的时间维度仍未得到承认。这篇文章借鉴了瑞典一家儿童福利机构的材料,从理论上受到后殖民和酷儿理论以及批判性儿童研究的启发。它基于护理令申请的分析并置,建议立即采取儿童福利干预措施,而干预措施是在长期评估后建议的。这些建议在时间上被认为是不平等的。文章讨论了与永久性和暂时性相关的时间主题,这些主题指导了对可变性的评估。我展示了即时干预措施如何应对慢性——不可侵犯性、永久性和不发达的暂时性。然而,长期评估中的社会问题只有在长期观察或经过一段时间后才能被评估为永久性问题。这篇文章讨论了关于变革的思想如何再现更广泛的社会和交叉的不平等。当考虑到分配给父母的时间以及他们带来改变的潜力时,这一点就显而易见了。我认为,尽管永久性不同于长期性,但它仍然限制了关于变革作为社会的讨论,对问题的发现仍然在发展主义和新自由主义的框架内。在结束语中,我提供了一种对分配时间的替代解读,它可以操纵发展主义逻辑,同时平衡个人和社会之间的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Time & Society
Time & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Time & Society publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing the workings of time and temporality across a range of disciplines, including anthropology, geography, history, psychology, and sociology. Work focuses on methodological and theoretical problems, including the use of time in organizational contexts. You"ll also find critiques of and proposals for time-related changes in the formation of public, social, economic, and organizational policies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond mothers’ time in childcare: Worlds of care and connection in the early life course Time use studies, time, temporality, and measuring care: Conceptual, methodological, and epistemological issues Fixing stone in time: Making and measuring consolidants for heritage futures Time and the Anthropocene: Making more-than-human temporalities legible through environmental observations and creative methods Hope and time work in dystopian contexts: Future-oriented temporalities of activism in post-referendum Scotland and Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1