Selma Riemenschneider’s Performance Career

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 MUSIC BACH Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1353/bach.2022.0005
Madeline Mascia
{"title":"Selma Riemenschneider’s Performance Career","authors":"Madeline Mascia","doi":"10.1353/bach.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"N ancy Reich’s “Women as Musicians: A Question of Class” identifies the distinction between professional and nonprofessional women musicians in the context of nineteenthcentury European music. Professional musicians, or what Reich refers to as the “artist-musician class,” were those who considered their artistry a source of income. For them, music was their livelihood. Conversely, nonprofessional musicians did not primarily participate in musical life publicly. Reich elaborates: “throughout the nineteenth century and well into the twentieth, then, we see women musicians on two tracks . . . on the one hand women who sang and played only in the privacy of their own homes, on the other hand women who appeared on concert and opera stages.” Selma Riemenschneider falls somewhere in between; she performed publicly only for a brief period in her early career, and primarily within the confines of church services and local organ recitals, which often were held at Baldwin Wallace (BW), where Selma was a member of the faculty. Ultimately, she refrained from a performance career and chose to focus on other musical activities, particularly related to the BW Bach Festival. Selma’s upper-class status certainly correlates with her professional life. Reich explains that “those from upper-class families used their skills and education at home, often to enhance a husband’s social position: a wife who could sing or play was a valuable asset. Other women searched out ways to perform, establish, and support music in their homes, churches, and communities, but always on a nonprofessional basis.” Selma’s father was John C. Marting, treasurer of BW, which meant that she came from a family of high status and therefore was not reliant upon her musical training to make a living for herself. Selma’s husband, Albert, was of a similar social class; the Riemenschneiders were well known in the community,","PeriodicalId":42367,"journal":{"name":"BACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bach.2022.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

N ancy Reich’s “Women as Musicians: A Question of Class” identifies the distinction between professional and nonprofessional women musicians in the context of nineteenthcentury European music. Professional musicians, or what Reich refers to as the “artist-musician class,” were those who considered their artistry a source of income. For them, music was their livelihood. Conversely, nonprofessional musicians did not primarily participate in musical life publicly. Reich elaborates: “throughout the nineteenth century and well into the twentieth, then, we see women musicians on two tracks . . . on the one hand women who sang and played only in the privacy of their own homes, on the other hand women who appeared on concert and opera stages.” Selma Riemenschneider falls somewhere in between; she performed publicly only for a brief period in her early career, and primarily within the confines of church services and local organ recitals, which often were held at Baldwin Wallace (BW), where Selma was a member of the faculty. Ultimately, she refrained from a performance career and chose to focus on other musical activities, particularly related to the BW Bach Festival. Selma’s upper-class status certainly correlates with her professional life. Reich explains that “those from upper-class families used their skills and education at home, often to enhance a husband’s social position: a wife who could sing or play was a valuable asset. Other women searched out ways to perform, establish, and support music in their homes, churches, and communities, but always on a nonprofessional basis.” Selma’s father was John C. Marting, treasurer of BW, which meant that she came from a family of high status and therefore was not reliant upon her musical training to make a living for herself. Selma’s husband, Albert, was of a similar social class; the Riemenschneiders were well known in the community,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selma Riemenschneider的演艺生涯
南希·赖希的《作为音乐家的女性:阶级问题》在19世纪欧洲音乐的背景下,明确了职业和非职业女性音乐家之间的区别。职业音乐家,或者Reich所说的“艺术家-音乐家阶层”,是那些把他们的艺术作为收入来源的人。对他们来说,音乐就是他们的生计。相反,非专业音乐家并不主要公开参与音乐生活。Reich阐述道:“在整个19世纪和进入20世纪,我们看到女性音乐家有两条轨道……一方面,女性只在自己家里唱歌和演奏,另一方面,女性出现在音乐会和歌剧舞台上。”Selma Riemenschneider介于两者之间;在她早期的职业生涯中,她只公开演出过很短的一段时间,主要是在教堂服务和当地风琴独奏会的范围内,这些独奏会通常在鲍德温华莱士(BW)举行,塞尔玛是那里的教员。最终,她放弃了表演生涯,选择专注于其他音乐活动,特别是与BW巴赫音乐节有关的活动。塞尔玛的上流社会地位当然与她的职业生涯有关。赖希解释说:“那些来自上层阶级家庭的人在家里利用他们的技能和教育,通常是为了提高丈夫的社会地位:一个会唱歌或演奏的妻子是一笔宝贵的财富。其他女性则在家里、教堂和社区寻找表演、建立和支持音乐的方法,但总是在非专业的基础上。”塞尔玛的父亲是约翰·c·马丁,BW的财务主管,这意味着她来自一个地位很高的家庭,因此不依赖于她的音乐训练来维持自己的生活。塞尔玛的丈夫阿尔伯特(Albert)也属于类似的社会阶层;黎曼施耐德夫妇在社区里很有名,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BACH
BACH MUSIC-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Let's Calculate Bach: Applying Information Theory and Statistics to Numbers in Music by Alan Shepherd (review) Two New Possible Models for the "Confiteor" of J. S. Bach's Mass in B Minor Bach Studies: Liturgy, Hymnology, and Theology by Robin A. Leaver (review) Tales from Music School: Johann Friedrich Fasch at the Thomasschule (1701–1707) Late Bach and Late Style Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1