Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity.

IF 10.7 Q1 ETHICS Research integrity and peer review Pub Date : 2019-11-06 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6
Andrew Grey, Mark Bolland, Alison Avenell
{"title":"Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity.","authors":"Andrew Grey, Mark Bolland, Alison Avenell","doi":"10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74682,"journal":{"name":"Research integrity and peer review","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6836422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research integrity and peer review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0082-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We provide additional information relevant to our previous publication on the quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions. Despite concerns being raised about ethical oversight of research published by a group of researchers, each of the four institutional investigations failed to determine and/or report whether ethics committee approval was obtained for the majority of publications assessed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估研究诚信过程中的伦理监督
我们提供了与我们之前关于学术机构研究诚信调查报告质量的出版物相关的额外信息。尽管对一组研究人员发表的研究的伦理监督提出了担忧,但这四项机构调查中的每一项都未能确定和/或报告大多数被评估的出版物是否获得了伦理委员会的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trials and tribulations of responsible people trying to uphold scientific standards. Most science is published from countries lacking in democracy and freedom of press. Comparison of preprints and their corresponding peer-reviewed publications in the health field: a scoping review. Gender reporting across regions and time in psychological studies: a scoping review of studies in psychological Science between 2019 and 2024. Reverse spin bias: preliminary observations of reporting bias in medical systematic reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1