{"title":"Book Review: Fighter, Worker, and Family Man. German-Jewish Men and Their Gendered Experiences in Nazi Germany, 1933–1941 by Sebastian Huebel","authors":"Sheer Ganor","doi":"10.1177/03631990221150490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One day in December 1942, during his internment as an illegal alien in Switzerland, Herbert Lewandowski opened his diary and mused over the significance of regular journaling. Partly in jest and partly in earnest he then added: “In keeping a diary at least I hold on to being a man” (Lee van Dovski, Schweizer Tagebuch eines Internierten. Pfeil Verlag, 1946, 35). Born in 1896 in Cassel, Germany, to a Jewish family, the Catholic convert Lewandowski was on the run from the genocidal antisemitic violence of the Nazis, which took the lives of several of his family members. Writing a diary may not appear to be an obvious expression of masculinity and manhood in their various cultural codifications. For Lewandowski, a product of a certain social milieu that celebrated cultural cultivation and refinement as a form of “making it,” the connection between keeping a diary and his identity as a man was not that big of a stretch. But as an interned refugee—safe, “but as a prisoner,” (28) as he put it—in a state of confined agency, the significance of his diary extended far beyond the habits and aspirations typical of his middle-class German-Jewish background. It was a rare outlet for creativity and productivity that allowed Lewandowski to insist on his right to define himself at a time when his ability to do so was increasingly threatened. The stories of men like Lewandowski, and those of their family and fellow community members, are at the focus of Sebastian Huebel’s important new book, Fighter, Worker and Family Man: German-Jewish Men and Their Gendered Experiences in Nazi Germany, 1933–1941. Huebel’s book explores how the National Socialist regime deliberately targeted Jewish masculinity as an integral element of its ideology as well as in policy, how Jewish men living in Germany at the time responded to these attacks on a personal level and how German-Jewish organizations confronted them on behalf of the entire community. While the regime’s actions towards undermining Jewish masculinity and Jewish men “signified a loss of authority and created feelings of powerlessness that were intricately linked to conceptions of masculinity (Huebel, 7),”Huebel shows that Jewish men developed a variety of strategies that helped to preserve their sense of agency and dignity in their pursuit of fighting against their intended emasculation (as understood according to the prevailing gender norms of their time and place). Gender historians have been producing incredibly important scholarship on the history of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust for several decades. Their work has made it clear that it is necessary to approach the analysis of that dark period with serious consideration of gender politics and gendered experiences. And yet, studies focusing explicitly on men and masculinity (and especially Jewish masculinity) remain scant still. Existing works mostly tend to focus on masculinity as a component of Fascism. Huebel’s focus on the gendered identities of Jewish men therefore brings to the forefront a theme that has been given insufficient scholarly attention. His thorough and accomplished treatment of the matter makes this contribution ever more welcomed. Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":45991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family History","volume":"48 1","pages":"363 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03631990221150490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One day in December 1942, during his internment as an illegal alien in Switzerland, Herbert Lewandowski opened his diary and mused over the significance of regular journaling. Partly in jest and partly in earnest he then added: “In keeping a diary at least I hold on to being a man” (Lee van Dovski, Schweizer Tagebuch eines Internierten. Pfeil Verlag, 1946, 35). Born in 1896 in Cassel, Germany, to a Jewish family, the Catholic convert Lewandowski was on the run from the genocidal antisemitic violence of the Nazis, which took the lives of several of his family members. Writing a diary may not appear to be an obvious expression of masculinity and manhood in their various cultural codifications. For Lewandowski, a product of a certain social milieu that celebrated cultural cultivation and refinement as a form of “making it,” the connection between keeping a diary and his identity as a man was not that big of a stretch. But as an interned refugee—safe, “but as a prisoner,” (28) as he put it—in a state of confined agency, the significance of his diary extended far beyond the habits and aspirations typical of his middle-class German-Jewish background. It was a rare outlet for creativity and productivity that allowed Lewandowski to insist on his right to define himself at a time when his ability to do so was increasingly threatened. The stories of men like Lewandowski, and those of their family and fellow community members, are at the focus of Sebastian Huebel’s important new book, Fighter, Worker and Family Man: German-Jewish Men and Their Gendered Experiences in Nazi Germany, 1933–1941. Huebel’s book explores how the National Socialist regime deliberately targeted Jewish masculinity as an integral element of its ideology as well as in policy, how Jewish men living in Germany at the time responded to these attacks on a personal level and how German-Jewish organizations confronted them on behalf of the entire community. While the regime’s actions towards undermining Jewish masculinity and Jewish men “signified a loss of authority and created feelings of powerlessness that were intricately linked to conceptions of masculinity (Huebel, 7),”Huebel shows that Jewish men developed a variety of strategies that helped to preserve their sense of agency and dignity in their pursuit of fighting against their intended emasculation (as understood according to the prevailing gender norms of their time and place). Gender historians have been producing incredibly important scholarship on the history of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust for several decades. Their work has made it clear that it is necessary to approach the analysis of that dark period with serious consideration of gender politics and gendered experiences. And yet, studies focusing explicitly on men and masculinity (and especially Jewish masculinity) remain scant still. Existing works mostly tend to focus on masculinity as a component of Fascism. Huebel’s focus on the gendered identities of Jewish men therefore brings to the forefront a theme that has been given insufficient scholarly attention. His thorough and accomplished treatment of the matter makes this contribution ever more welcomed. Book Reviews
1942年12月的一天,赫伯特·莱万多夫斯基(Herbert Lewandowski)作为一名非法外国人在瑞士被拘留期间,打开日记,思考定期写日记的意义。他接着补充道:“写日记,至少我坚持做一个男人”(Lee van Dovski,Schweizer Tagebuch eines Internierten.Pfeil Verlag,1946,35)。1896年出生于德国卡塞尔的一个犹太家庭,天主教皈依者莱万多夫斯基正在逃离纳粹的种族灭绝反犹太主义暴力,这场暴力夺走了他的几个家庭成员的生命。在他们的各种文化编纂中,写日记可能并不是男性气概和男子气概的明显表现。莱万多夫斯基是某个社会环境的产物,这个社会环境将文化修养和精致视为一种“创造”的形式,对他来说,写日记和他作为一个男人的身份之间的联系并没有那么大。但作为一名被拘留的难民——安全,“但又是一名囚犯,”(28)正如他所说——处于一种封闭的代理状态,他的日记的意义远远超出了他中产阶级德国犹太背景的典型习惯和愿望。这是一个罕见的创造力和生产力的出口,让莱万多夫斯基在自己的能力越来越受到威胁的时候,坚持自己定义自己的权利。Sebastian Huebel的重要新书《战士、工人和居家男人:德国犹太人及其在纳粹德国的性别经历,1933-1941》聚焦于像Lewandowski这样的男人以及他们的家人和社区成员的故事。Huebel的书探讨了国家社会主义政权如何故意将犹太男子气概作为其意识形态和政策的一个组成部分,当时生活在德国的犹太男子如何在个人层面上应对这些攻击,以及德国犹太组织如何代表整个社区与他们对抗。虽然该政权破坏犹太男子气概和犹太男子气概的行为“标志着权威的丧失,并产生了与男子气概概念密切相关的无力感(Huebel,7)”,但Huebel表明,犹太男子制定了各种策略,有助于在追求与自己的有意阉割(根据其时间和地点的主流性别规范来理解)。几十年来,性别历史学家一直在为纳粹德国和大屠杀的历史提供极其重要的学术研究。他们的工作表明,在分析那段黑暗时期时,有必要认真考虑性别政治和性别经历。然而,明确关注男性和男子气概(尤其是犹太男子气概)的研究仍然很少。现有的作品大多倾向于将男子气概作为法西斯主义的一个组成部分。因此,Huebel对犹太男性性别身份的关注将一个学术界关注不足的主题带到了最前沿。他对此事的彻底和圆满处理使这一贡献越来越受到欢迎。书评
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Family History is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes scholarly research from an international perspective concerning the family as a historical social form, with contributions from the disciplines of history, gender studies, economics, law, political science, policy studies, demography, anthropology, sociology, liberal arts, and the humanities. Themes including gender, sexuality, race, class, and culture are welcome. Its contents, which will be composed of both monographic and interpretative work (including full-length review essays and thematic fora), will reflect the international scope of research on the history of the family.