Effects of Healthcare Organization Actions and Policies Related to COVID-19 on Perceived Organizational Support Among U.S. Internists: A National Study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-21-00208
J. Sonis, D. Pathman, S. Read, B. Gaynes, Courtney Canter, P. Curran, Cheryl B. Jones, Thomas Miller
{"title":"Effects of Healthcare Organization Actions and Policies Related to COVID-19 on Perceived Organizational Support Among U.S. Internists: A National Study","authors":"J. Sonis, D. Pathman, S. Read, B. Gaynes, Courtney Canter, P. Curran, Cheryl B. Jones, Thomas Miller","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-21-00208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Goal: Perceived organizational support (POS) may promote healthcare worker mental health, but organizational factors that foster POS during the COVID-19 pandemic are unknown. The goals of this study were to identify actions and policies regarding COVID-19 that healthcare organizations can implement to promote POS and to evaluate the impact of POS on physicians’ mental health, burnout, and intention to leave patient care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey with an online panel of internal medicine physicians from the American College of Physicians in September and October of 2020. POS was measured with a 4-item scale, based on items from Eisenberger’s Perceived Organizational Support Scale that were adapted for the pandemic. Mental health outcomes and burnout were measured with short screening scales. Principal Findings: The response rate was 37.8% (N = 810). Three healthcare organization actions and policies were independently associated with higher levels of POS in a multiple linear regression model that included all actions and policies as well as potential confounding factors: opportunities to discuss ethical issues related to COVID-19 (β (regression coefficient) = 0.74, p = .001), adequate access to personal protective equipment (β = 1.00, p = .005), and leadership that listens to healthcare worker concerns regarding COVID-19 (β = 3.58, p < .001). Sanctioning workers who speak out on COVID-19 safety issues or refuse pandemic deployment was associated with lower POS (β = –2.06, p < .001). In multivariable logistic regression models, high POS was associated with approximately half the odds of screening positive for generalized anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, burnout, and intention to leave patient care within 5 years. Applications to Practice: Our results suggest that healthcare organizations may be able to increase POS among physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic by guaranteeing adequate personal protective equipment, making sure that leaders listen to concerns about COVID-19, and offering opportunities to discuss ethical concerns related to caring for patients with COVID-19. Other policies and actions such as rapid COVID-19 tests may be implemented for the safety of staff and patients, but the policies and actions associated with POS in multivariable models in this study are likely to have the largest positive impact on POS. Warning or sanctioning workers who refuse pandemic deployment or speak up about worker and patient safety is associated with lower POS and should be avoided. We also found that high degrees of POS are associated with lower rates of adverse outcomes. So, by implementing the tangible support policies positively associated with POS and avoiding punitive ones, healthcare organizations may be able to reduce adverse mental health outcomes and attrition among their physicians.","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"67 1","pages":"192 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-21-00208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

SUMMARY Goal: Perceived organizational support (POS) may promote healthcare worker mental health, but organizational factors that foster POS during the COVID-19 pandemic are unknown. The goals of this study were to identify actions and policies regarding COVID-19 that healthcare organizations can implement to promote POS and to evaluate the impact of POS on physicians’ mental health, burnout, and intention to leave patient care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey with an online panel of internal medicine physicians from the American College of Physicians in September and October of 2020. POS was measured with a 4-item scale, based on items from Eisenberger’s Perceived Organizational Support Scale that were adapted for the pandemic. Mental health outcomes and burnout were measured with short screening scales. Principal Findings: The response rate was 37.8% (N = 810). Three healthcare organization actions and policies were independently associated with higher levels of POS in a multiple linear regression model that included all actions and policies as well as potential confounding factors: opportunities to discuss ethical issues related to COVID-19 (β (regression coefficient) = 0.74, p = .001), adequate access to personal protective equipment (β = 1.00, p = .005), and leadership that listens to healthcare worker concerns regarding COVID-19 (β = 3.58, p < .001). Sanctioning workers who speak out on COVID-19 safety issues or refuse pandemic deployment was associated with lower POS (β = –2.06, p < .001). In multivariable logistic regression models, high POS was associated with approximately half the odds of screening positive for generalized anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, burnout, and intention to leave patient care within 5 years. Applications to Practice: Our results suggest that healthcare organizations may be able to increase POS among physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic by guaranteeing adequate personal protective equipment, making sure that leaders listen to concerns about COVID-19, and offering opportunities to discuss ethical concerns related to caring for patients with COVID-19. Other policies and actions such as rapid COVID-19 tests may be implemented for the safety of staff and patients, but the policies and actions associated with POS in multivariable models in this study are likely to have the largest positive impact on POS. Warning or sanctioning workers who refuse pandemic deployment or speak up about worker and patient safety is associated with lower POS and should be avoided. We also found that high degrees of POS are associated with lower rates of adverse outcomes. So, by implementing the tangible support policies positively associated with POS and avoiding punitive ones, healthcare organizations may be able to reduce adverse mental health outcomes and attrition among their physicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健组织与新冠肺炎相关的行动和政策对美国实习生感知组织支持的影响:一项全国性研究
摘要目标:感知组织支持(POS)可能促进医护人员的心理健康,但在新冠肺炎大流行期间促进POS的组织因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定医疗机构可以实施的关于新冠肺炎的行动和政策,以促进POS,并评估POS对医生心理健康、倦怠和离开患者护理的意图的影响。方法:我们在2020年9月和10月与美国医师学会的内科医师在线小组进行了一项全国性的横断面调查。POS采用4项量表进行测量,该量表基于艾森伯格感知组织支持量表中适用于疫情的项目。心理健康结果和倦怠用短筛查量表进行测量。主要发现:有效率为37.8%(N=810)。在多元线性回归模型中,三个医疗保健组织的行动和政策与较高水平的POS独立相关,该模型包括所有行动和政策以及潜在的混淆因素:讨论与新冠肺炎相关的伦理问题的机会(β(回归系数)=0.74,p=.001),充分获得个人防护设备(β=1.00,p=.005),以及倾听医护人员对新冠肺炎的担忧的领导能力(β=3.58,p<.001)。制裁就新冠肺炎安全问题发声或拒绝大流行部署的工作人员与较低的POS相关(β=–2.06,p<0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,高POS与广泛性焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍、倦怠和5年内打算离开患者护理的筛查呈阳性的几率约为一半有关。实践应用:我们的研究结果表明,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,医疗保健组织可能能够通过保证足够的个人防护设备,确保领导人倾听对新冠肺炎的担忧,并提供机会讨论与照顾新冠肺炎患者相关的道德问题,来增加医生的POS。为了员工和患者的安全,可能会实施其他政策和行动,如快速新冠肺炎检测,但本研究中多变量模型中与POS相关的政策和行动可能对POS产生最大的积极影响。警告或制裁拒绝疫情部署或公开谈论工人和患者安全的工人与较低的POS有关,应该避免。我们还发现,高度POS与较低的不良后果发生率有关。因此,通过实施与POS积极相关的有形支持政策并避免惩罚性政策,医疗保健组织可能能够减少不良的心理健康结果和医生之间的流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
A New Era for the Patient Safety Imperative. An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Capabilities and Performance Improvement in Hospitals. Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration. Associations Between Organizational Support, Burnout, and Professional Fulfillment Among US Physicians During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Burke Kline, DHA, FACHE, CHFP, CEO, Jefferson Community Health & Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1