Mistletoe (Dendrophthoe neelgherrensis Wigh & Arn. Tiegh.) Parasitism on Yield of Nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.): Have We Been Underrating the Destructivity?

S. Yapa, A. J. Mohotti, S. Samita
{"title":"Mistletoe (Dendrophthoe neelgherrensis Wigh & Arn. Tiegh.) Parasitism on Yield of Nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.): Have We Been Underrating the Destructivity?","authors":"S. Yapa, A. J. Mohotti, S. Samita","doi":"10.4038/tar.v33i1.8533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of mistletoe Dendrophthoe neelgherrensis (Wigh & Arn.) Tiegh. on nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) yield was evaluated in mistletoe-infested and non–infested (control) trees during two fruiting seasons (January) in 2017 and 2019. Infested trees in season I and II had 40% and 10% of canopy covered (infestation) with the mistletoe, respectively. For yield determination, one branch was selected per whorl from each control tree. In each infested tree, one branch was selected from each non–infested whorl while two branches i.e. one infested and one non–infested, were selected from each infested whorl. The number of fruits was counted (yield) in each selected sub–lateral branch. Data were analyzed by fitting log–linear models after adjusting for over-dispersion, and comparisons were made using maximum likelihood estimates. There was no significant yield loss per tree at 10% infestation of mistletoe. However, at 40% infestation, yield dropped by 65% (from 6,238 to 2,159 fruits per tree). Yield loss in non–infested branches of infested trees was 37.2% whereas the drop was 89.6% in infested branches of those trees. Similarly, yield loss in non–infested whorls of infested trees was 48.2% whereas the drop was 84.8% for infested whorls of the infested trees. A quadratic yield pattern along the canopy was revealed, but the presence of the mistletoe was not related to the yield pattern of the tree. The study highlighted the destructive impact of mistletoe on nutmeg trees even with 10% infestation reducing the yield obtained from both the infested and non-infested branches and thus, the need for its timely control. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v33i1.8533","PeriodicalId":23313,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agricultural research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v33i1.8533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impact of mistletoe Dendrophthoe neelgherrensis (Wigh & Arn.) Tiegh. on nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) yield was evaluated in mistletoe-infested and non–infested (control) trees during two fruiting seasons (January) in 2017 and 2019. Infested trees in season I and II had 40% and 10% of canopy covered (infestation) with the mistletoe, respectively. For yield determination, one branch was selected per whorl from each control tree. In each infested tree, one branch was selected from each non–infested whorl while two branches i.e. one infested and one non–infested, were selected from each infested whorl. The number of fruits was counted (yield) in each selected sub–lateral branch. Data were analyzed by fitting log–linear models after adjusting for over-dispersion, and comparisons were made using maximum likelihood estimates. There was no significant yield loss per tree at 10% infestation of mistletoe. However, at 40% infestation, yield dropped by 65% (from 6,238 to 2,159 fruits per tree). Yield loss in non–infested branches of infested trees was 37.2% whereas the drop was 89.6% in infested branches of those trees. Similarly, yield loss in non–infested whorls of infested trees was 48.2% whereas the drop was 84.8% for infested whorls of the infested trees. A quadratic yield pattern along the canopy was revealed, but the presence of the mistletoe was not related to the yield pattern of the tree. The study highlighted the destructive impact of mistletoe on nutmeg trees even with 10% infestation reducing the yield obtained from both the infested and non-infested branches and thus, the need for its timely control. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v33i1.8533
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
槲寄生(Dendrophthoe neelgherrensis Wigh & Arn)Tiegh)。肉豆蔻(Myristica fragrans Houtt.)产量的寄生性:我们是否低估了其破坏性?
槲寄生对neelgherrensis(Wigh&Arn.)Tiegh的影响。在2017年和2019年的两个结果季节(1月),对槲寄生和非槲寄生(对照)树的肉豆蔻产量进行了评估。第一季和第二季受感染的树木的树冠分别覆盖了40%和10%的槲寄生。为了确定产量,从每个对照树中每轮生选择一个枝条。在每棵受感染的树中,从每个未受感染的轮生中选择一个分支,而从每个受感染的轮生中选择两个分支,即一个受感染和一个未受感染。对每个选定的次侧枝的果实数量(产量)进行计数。在对过度分散进行调整后,通过拟合对数-线性模型对数据进行分析,并使用最大似然估计进行比较。在10%的槲寄生侵扰下,每棵树的产量没有显著损失。然而,在40%的虫害下,产量下降了65%(从每棵树6238个果实下降到2159个果实)。受侵扰树木的非受侵扰枝条的产量损失为37.2%,而受侵扰树枝的产量下降为89.6%。同样,受侵扰树木的非受侵扰轮次的产量损失为48.2%,而受侵扰树木轮次的损失为84.8%。揭示了沿树冠的二次产量模式,但槲寄生的存在与树的产量模式无关。该研究强调了槲寄生对肉豆蔻树的破坏性影响,即使10%的虫害会降低受虫害和未受虫害枝条的产量,因此需要及时控制。DOI:http://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v33i1.8533
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and Dietary Diversities with Seasonality in Rural Agricultural Context in Sri Lanka: A Case of Mahakanumulla Village Tank Cascade System Changes in Total and Available K Contents in Feldspar and Mica Co-pyrolyzed with Poultry Litter at Different Temperatures Introducing a ‘Postharvest Loss Index (PHLI)’ for Some Selected High Producing Vegetables in Sri Lanka to Enhance Food Security Behavioral Intention of Paddy Farmers Towards Adoption of Organic Sources for Soil Nutrient Management Consequent to Policy Decision to Ban Agro-chemicals in Sri Lanka: A Case Study Solid Formulation of Trichoderma virens for the Management of Banana Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum musae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1