Rational or emotional? Prohibitive voice of outsourced employees in a time trajectory perspective

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1111/1744-7941.12334
Chuanyan Qin, Pengcheng Wang, Shanshi Liu, Guangyi Xu
{"title":"Rational or emotional? Prohibitive voice of outsourced employees in a time trajectory perspective","authors":"Chuanyan Qin,&nbsp;Pengcheng Wang,&nbsp;Shanshi Liu,&nbsp;Guangyi Xu","doi":"10.1111/1744-7941.12334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does outsourced employees' risk behavior depend more on rationality or emotion in temporary interorganizational project-based teams? Combining trust-related research and a time trajectory perspective, this study re-examines the relationship between trust and outsourced employees' prohibitive voice in interorganizational project-based teams. Two-wave survey data were collected from 286 outsourced employees and their supervisors across 52 interorganizational teams in China. Empirical results show that outsourced employees' prohibitive voice depends more on cognition-based trust than on affect-based trust. With project execution time increases, the promoting effect of affect-based trust on prohibitive voice shows an increase, while the impact of cognition-based trust demonstrated little variation. Moreover, outsourced employees' perceptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation mediates the moderating effect of project execution time on the relationship between affect-based trust and prohibitive voice. However, the mediated moderation effect is not significant for cognition-based trust. Theoretical and practical implications for project-based team management are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51582,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-7941.12334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Does outsourced employees' risk behavior depend more on rationality or emotion in temporary interorganizational project-based teams? Combining trust-related research and a time trajectory perspective, this study re-examines the relationship between trust and outsourced employees' prohibitive voice in interorganizational project-based teams. Two-wave survey data were collected from 286 outsourced employees and their supervisors across 52 interorganizational teams in China. Empirical results show that outsourced employees' prohibitive voice depends more on cognition-based trust than on affect-based trust. With project execution time increases, the promoting effect of affect-based trust on prohibitive voice shows an increase, while the impact of cognition-based trust demonstrated little variation. Moreover, outsourced employees' perceptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) differentiation mediates the moderating effect of project execution time on the relationship between affect-based trust and prohibitive voice. However, the mediated moderation effect is not significant for cognition-based trust. Theoretical and practical implications for project-based team management are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理性还是感性?从时间轨迹的角度看外包员工的禁言
在临时跨组织项目团队中,外包员工的风险行为更依赖于理性还是情感?本研究结合信任相关研究与时间轨迹视角,重新检视组织间专案团队中信任与外包员工禁言的关系。本研究收集了来自中国52个跨组织团队的286名外包员工及其主管的两波调查数据。实证结果表明,外包员工的禁忌性声音更依赖于基于认知的信任,而不是基于情感的信任。随着项目执行时间的增加,基于情感的信任对禁止性声音的促进作用增强,而基于认知的信任的影响变化不大。此外,外包员工对领导-成员交换(LMX)差异的感知在项目执行时间对基于情感的信任与禁止性声音之间关系的调节作用中起中介作用。而认知信任的中介调节效应不显著。讨论了基于项目的团队管理的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources adheres to a rigorous double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources is an applied, peer-reviewed journal which aims to communicate the development and practice of the field of human resources within the Asia Pacific region. The journal publishes the results of research, theoretical and conceptual developments, and examples of current practice. The overall aim is to increase the understanding of the management of human resource in an organisational setting.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Work Engagement: The Effects of Reverse Mentoring and Knowledge Sharing Will Fun and Care Prevent Gig Workers' Withdrawal? A Moderated Mediation Model Correction to “Human Resource Flexibility and Employee Creativity: The Roles of Perceived HR Strength, Career Satisfaction, and Employer Brand” When and Why Does Platform Leadership Drive Employee Intrapreneurship? Moderating Role of Innovation-Oriented Human Resource Management Trade Unions and the British Industrial Relations CrisisBy Peter Ackers, New York and Abingdon-On-Thames, UK: Routledge, 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1