Symmetric Least Squares Estimates of Functional Relationships

Q3 Social Sciences ETS Research Report Series Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI:10.1002/ets2.12331
Michael T. Kane
{"title":"Symmetric Least Squares Estimates of Functional Relationships","authors":"Michael T. Kane","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression provides optimal linear predictions of a dependent variable, <i>y</i>, given an independent variable, <i>x</i>, but OLS regressions are not symmetric or reversible. In order to get optimal linear predictions of <i>x</i> given <i>y</i>, a separate OLS regression in that direction would be needed. This report provides a least squares derivation of the geometric mean (GM) regression line, which is symmetric and reversible, as the line that minimizes a weighted sum of the mean squared errors for <i>y</i>, given <i>x</i>, and for <i>x</i>, given <i>y</i>. It is shown that the GM regression line is symmetric and predicts equally well (or poorly, depending on the absolute value of <i>r</i><sub><i>xy</i></sub>) in both directions. The errors of prediction for the GM line are, naturally, larger for the predictions of both <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> than those for the two OLS equations, each of which is specifically optimized for prediction in one direction, but for high values of , the difference is not large. The GM line has previously been derived as a special case of principal-components analysis and gets its name from the fact that its slope is equal to the geometric mean of the slopes of the OLS regressions of <i>y</i> on <i>x</i> and <i>x</i> on <i>y</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12331","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression provides optimal linear predictions of a dependent variable, y, given an independent variable, x, but OLS regressions are not symmetric or reversible. In order to get optimal linear predictions of x given y, a separate OLS regression in that direction would be needed. This report provides a least squares derivation of the geometric mean (GM) regression line, which is symmetric and reversible, as the line that minimizes a weighted sum of the mean squared errors for y, given x, and for x, given y. It is shown that the GM regression line is symmetric and predicts equally well (or poorly, depending on the absolute value of rxy) in both directions. The errors of prediction for the GM line are, naturally, larger for the predictions of both x and y than those for the two OLS equations, each of which is specifically optimized for prediction in one direction, but for high values of , the difference is not large. The GM line has previously been derived as a special case of principal-components analysis and gets its name from the fact that its slope is equal to the geometric mean of the slopes of the OLS regressions of y on x and x on y.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
函数关系的对称最小二乘估计
给定自变量x,普通最小二乘(OLS)回归提供了因变量y的最佳线性预测,但OLS回归不是对称的或可逆的。为了在给定y的情况下获得x的最佳线性预测,需要在该方向上进行单独的OLS回归。本报告提供了几何平均(GM)回归线的最小二乘推导,这是对称的和可逆的,因为这条线可以最小化给定x的y和给定y的x的均方误差的加权和。结果表明,GM回归线是对称的,并且在两个方向上预测同样好(或差,取决于rxy的绝对值)。对于x和y的预测,GM线的预测误差自然比两个OLS方程的预测误差大,其中每个方程都是专门针对一个方向进行优化的预测,但对于高值,差异并不大。GM线以前是作为主成分分析的一种特殊情况推导出来的,它的斜率等于y对x和x对y的OLS回归斜率的几何平均值,因此得名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Building a Validity Argument for the TOEFL Junior® Tests Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD‐Next Exam Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Modeling Writing Traits in a Formative Essay Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1