Other Facets of Workplace Abuse: An Exploratory Study

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Psychologist-Manager Journal Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.1037/mgr0000060
A. Cavaiola, D. Stout
{"title":"Other Facets of Workplace Abuse: An Exploratory Study","authors":"A. Cavaiola, D. Stout","doi":"10.1037/mgr0000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has identified a variety of forms of workplace abuse (e.g., bullying and ostracism) and various forms of workplace incivility, including exploitation. To explore other forms of workplace abuse, 354 participants from various occupations were surveyed by using a questionnaire developed by the authors (Beyond Bullying Questionnaire [BBQ]). When compared with the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised (NAQ-R; Einarsen, Hoel, & Notelears, 2009), the BBQ revealed nearly equal percentages (64.86% and 64.95%, respectively) of participants endorsing one or more items on both measures, suggesting a likelihood that those who experience bullying may also be subjected to other forms of workplace abuse. Significant correlations were found between the full scale or composite scores of the NAQ-R and the BBQ; however, the subscales were not strongly correlated, suggesting that these scales measure distinct aspects of workplace abuse. However, multiple regression analysis revealed that the Person-Related Bullying subscale of the NAQ-R, the Exploitation subscale of the BBQ, participant’s age, and overall number of stressors were found to be significant predictors of the Global Severity Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory, suggesting that the other forms of workplace abuse caused both stress and psychological distress for workers who experienced these behaviors. Overall, being subjected to bullying behaviors resulted in higher levels of psychological distress, as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory; higher levels of traumatic symptoms, as measured by the Impact of Events Scale–Revised; and higher levels of stress, as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale, when compared with other forms of workplace abuse.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Previous research has identified a variety of forms of workplace abuse (e.g., bullying and ostracism) and various forms of workplace incivility, including exploitation. To explore other forms of workplace abuse, 354 participants from various occupations were surveyed by using a questionnaire developed by the authors (Beyond Bullying Questionnaire [BBQ]). When compared with the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised (NAQ-R; Einarsen, Hoel, & Notelears, 2009), the BBQ revealed nearly equal percentages (64.86% and 64.95%, respectively) of participants endorsing one or more items on both measures, suggesting a likelihood that those who experience bullying may also be subjected to other forms of workplace abuse. Significant correlations were found between the full scale or composite scores of the NAQ-R and the BBQ; however, the subscales were not strongly correlated, suggesting that these scales measure distinct aspects of workplace abuse. However, multiple regression analysis revealed that the Person-Related Bullying subscale of the NAQ-R, the Exploitation subscale of the BBQ, participant’s age, and overall number of stressors were found to be significant predictors of the Global Severity Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory, suggesting that the other forms of workplace abuse caused both stress and psychological distress for workers who experienced these behaviors. Overall, being subjected to bullying behaviors resulted in higher levels of psychological distress, as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory; higher levels of traumatic symptoms, as measured by the Impact of Events Scale–Revised; and higher levels of stress, as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale, when compared with other forms of workplace abuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所虐待的其他方面:一项探索性研究
先前的研究已经确定了各种形式的工作场所虐待(例如,欺凌和排斥)和各种形式的工作场所不文明行为,包括剥削。为了探索其他形式的职场虐待,354名来自不同职业的参与者接受了作者开发的问卷调查(Beyond Bullying questionnaire [BBQ])。与负面行为问卷(NAQ-R;Einarsen, Hoel, & Notelears, 2009), BBQ显示几乎相同的百分比(分别为64.86%和64.95%)的参与者在两个测量中都赞同一个或多个项目,这表明那些经历过欺凌的人可能也会遭受其他形式的工作场所虐待。NAQ-R的全量表或综合得分与BBQ之间存在显著相关;然而,这些子量表并没有很强的相关性,这表明这些量表测量的是工作场所虐待的不同方面。然而,多元回归分析发现,NAQ-R中与人相关的欺凌子量表、BBQ中的剥削子量表、被试年龄和压力源总数是简要症状量表整体严重程度指数的显著预测因子,这表明其他形式的工作场所虐待对经历过这些行为的员工造成了压力和心理困扰。总体而言,遭受欺凌行为导致更高水平的心理困扰,如简短症状量表测量;以事件影响量表(修订版)衡量的创伤症状程度较高;根据“感知压力量表”(Perceived stress Scale)的测量,与其他形式的职场虐待相比,压力水平更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders that don’t care: Investigating leader caregiving from an attachment-theoretical perspective. Value–task concordance as a predictor of job satisfaction and workplace engagement. Becoming an organizational leader: A different career path for psychologists. The road to gender equality: Persisting obstacles for American women in the workforce. The practice of management: The ascent of women as scholars and leaders in the field of zoo biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1