{"title":"The Revolutionary Politics of Abolition","authors":"Anna Terwiel","doi":"10.1086/726388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does it mean to abolish the police? 1 Narrowly defined, the police are the state institution authorized to use violence against citizens, residents, and anyone else present in a given territory, to maintain public order and enforce the law. But by and large, contemporary abolitionists in the United States resist defining police in this narrow sense. Instead, they define the police expansively, to include not only private security forces and citizens who act as informal police deputies but also broader practices and institutions that surveil and control Black people and other marginalized groups. This expansive definition locates the police on a continuum with prisons and the carceral, and abolitionist scholars and activists have called for the abolition of the child welfare system, social work, and residential institutions for people with disabilities, among other demands. In part, this expansive definition of policing reflects the punitive nature of the contemporary U.S. state, in which racialized policing and punishment have either become entangled with or overtaken other state functions, such as the provision of basic","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
What does it mean to abolish the police? 1 Narrowly defined, the police are the state institution authorized to use violence against citizens, residents, and anyone else present in a given territory, to maintain public order and enforce the law. But by and large, contemporary abolitionists in the United States resist defining police in this narrow sense. Instead, they define the police expansively, to include not only private security forces and citizens who act as informal police deputies but also broader practices and institutions that surveil and control Black people and other marginalized groups. This expansive definition locates the police on a continuum with prisons and the carceral, and abolitionist scholars and activists have called for the abolition of the child welfare system, social work, and residential institutions for people with disabilities, among other demands. In part, this expansive definition of policing reflects the punitive nature of the contemporary U.S. state, in which racialized policing and punishment have either become entangled with or overtaken other state functions, such as the provision of basic
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.