Too Much History: Castro-Huerta and the Problem of Change In Indian Law

IF 2 2区社会学 Q1 LAW Supreme Court Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/724831

Gregory Ablavsky

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite bitter criticism and the defiance of Georgia which refused to obey this Court’s mandate in Worcester the broad principles of that decision came to be accepted as law. Over the years this Court has modified these principles in cases where essential tribal relations were not involved and where the rights of Indians would not be jeopardized, but the basic policy of Worcester has remained. (Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217, 219 (1959).)

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

太多的历史:卡斯特罗-韦尔塔和印度法律的变化问题

尽管格鲁吉亚受到严厉的批评和蔑视，拒绝服从法院在伍斯特的授权，但该决定的广泛原则最终被接受为法律。多年来，本院在不涉及基本部落关系和印第安人权利不会受到损害的情况下修改了这些原则，但伍斯特的基本政策保持不变。(Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217, 219(1959)。)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Supreme Court Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

5.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court"s most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

期刊最新文献

Front Matter What Should Be National and What Should Be Local in American Judicial Review Disestablishing the Establishment Clause Manufacturing Outliers The Anti-Democratic Major Questions Doctrine