The treatment of complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions- conclusions from the unselected patients cohort.

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Acta Angiologica Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI:10.5603/aa.2021.0011
Aleksander Łukasiewicz
{"title":"The treatment of complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions- conclusions from the unselected patients cohort.","authors":"Aleksander Łukasiewicz","doi":"10.5603/aa.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Endovascular techniques have revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Despite this, the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions is a field of debate. This report sum marizes the current experience in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions in the author’s center. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with complex (TASC C and D) femoropopliteal lesions. The patients were treated using either endovascular procedure or surgical bypass. Details of the procedure, complications, mortality and amputation rate, primary and secondary patency rates, and reinterventions were analyzed. Results: The study included 201 patients. One hundred thirty patients received endovascular treatment (ET), whereas in 67 a femoropopliteal bypass (FB) was implanted. The hybrid approach was utilized in 4 patients. ET was preferred in primary (88.5% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), shorter (25 vs. 30 cm, p < 0.02), TASC C lesions (63.1% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.003). Complications were more common in FB group (26.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.03). Reinterventions were similar. The postoperative stay was shorter in the ET group (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Primary and secondary patency rates for autologous vein reconstruction were insignificantly higher than for ET. Primary and secondary patency in patients with synthetic bypass was significantly inferior to autologous vein conduit (AVC) and endovascular procedure. The limb salvage at 3 years was highest in the ET group (94.1%) and the difference was significant (p < 0.04, and p < 0.001 for AVC and synthetic bypass, respectively). Conclusions: ET is preferred in primary and shorter lesions and is related to the shorter postoperative stay. It carries a lower risk of major amputation than surgery. Autologous vein conduit provides highest primary and secondary patency rates. Both treatment options (surgery and endovascular) should be considered in patients with long femoropopliteal lesions to assure the optimal outcome.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2021.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endovascular techniques have revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Despite this, the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions is a field of debate. This report sum marizes the current experience in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions in the author’s center. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with complex (TASC C and D) femoropopliteal lesions. The patients were treated using either endovascular procedure or surgical bypass. Details of the procedure, complications, mortality and amputation rate, primary and secondary patency rates, and reinterventions were analyzed. Results: The study included 201 patients. One hundred thirty patients received endovascular treatment (ET), whereas in 67 a femoropopliteal bypass (FB) was implanted. The hybrid approach was utilized in 4 patients. ET was preferred in primary (88.5% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), shorter (25 vs. 30 cm, p < 0.02), TASC C lesions (63.1% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.003). Complications were more common in FB group (26.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.03). Reinterventions were similar. The postoperative stay was shorter in the ET group (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Primary and secondary patency rates for autologous vein reconstruction were insignificantly higher than for ET. Primary and secondary patency in patients with synthetic bypass was significantly inferior to autologous vein conduit (AVC) and endovascular procedure. The limb salvage at 3 years was highest in the ET group (94.1%) and the difference was significant (p < 0.04, and p < 0.001 for AVC and synthetic bypass, respectively). Conclusions: ET is preferred in primary and shorter lesions and is related to the shorter postoperative stay. It carries a lower risk of major amputation than surgery. Autologous vein conduit provides highest primary and secondary patency rates. Both treatment options (surgery and endovascular) should be considered in patients with long femoropopliteal lesions to assure the optimal outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂股腘动脉粥样硬化病变的治疗——来自未选择患者队列的结论。
血管内技术已经彻底改变了下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)的治疗。尽管如此,复杂股腘病变的治疗仍是一个有争议的领域。本报告总结了目前在作者中心治疗复杂股腘病变的经验。材料和方法:这是一项针对复杂(TASC C和D)股腘动脉病变患者的回顾性观察队列研究。患者采用血管内手术或旁路手术治疗。分析手术细节、并发症、死亡率和截肢率、原发性和继发性通畅率以及再干预。结果:纳入201例患者。130例患者接受了血管内治疗(ET), 67例患者接受了股腘动脉搭桥(FB)。4例患者采用混合入路。ET优先用于原发性(88.5%对47.8%,p < 0.001)、较短(25对30 cm, p < 0.02)、TASC C病变(63.1%对40.3%,p < 0.003)。FB组并发症发生率较高(26.9% vs 13.8%, p < 0.03)。再干预情况相似。ET组术后住院时间较短(1天vs. 6天,p < 0.001)。自体静脉重建的原发性和继发性通畅率不显著高于ET。人工搭桥患者的原发性和继发性通畅率明显低于自体静脉导管(AVC)和血管内手术。ET组3年肢体保留率最高(94.1%),AVC组和人工旁路组差异有统计学意义(p < 0.04, p < 0.001)。结论:ET优先用于原发性和较短的病变,并与较短的术后住院时间有关。它比手术有更低的截肢风险。自体静脉导管提供最高的原发性和继发性通畅率。长股腘病变患者应考虑两种治疗方案(手术和血管内),以确保最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Angiologica
Acta Angiologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Angiologica is a bilingual (Polish/English) quarterly for angiologists and vascular surgeons as well as for other doctors interested in vascular disorders. Original papers, reviews, case reports and letters submitted by authors from different countries, concerning physiology, pathology, presentation, diagnostics and treatment of vascular system, are published. Thorough contents of Acta Angiologica provide valuable information about modern diagnostic and therapeutic issues as well as advances in basic sciences and pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing two risk scores for predictive ability of contrast-induced nephropathy development in patients presenting with chronic coronary syndrome Successful surgical treatment of popliteal artery cystic adventitial disease Complex management of multiple aneurysms in a patient with significant atherosclerosis and vascular comorbidities Kompleksowa opieka nad pacjentem z chorobą naczyń obwodowych tętnic i żył — rekomendacje zespołu ekspertów 2023 Superficial temporal artery aneurysm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1