P. Joshi, S. Sigdel, Amit Sharma Bhattarai, B. Pradhan
{"title":"Hemodynamic Responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: Comparison between Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope","authors":"P. Joshi, S. Sigdel, Amit Sharma Bhattarai, B. Pradhan","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v21i1.42382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laryngoscopy causes exaggerated hemodynamics as tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmias and may have deleterious respiratory, neurological, and cardiovascular effects. A very few studies have compared the effects of various types of laryngoscope blades on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.\nMethodology: A prospective randomized study was done to compare the hemodynamic response to using McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope. A hundred patients, belonging to ASA grade I and II, between 15-65 years, requiring general anesthesia with intubation were included. A standard anesthesia technique was used. Both groups(n=50) were matched demographically. Mallampati grading, laryngoscopy and intubation time, laryngeal visualization grades, and hemodynamic variables at baseline were comparable.\nResult: Following laryngoscopy there was significant rise in heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure. The maximum change in HR compared to baseline was 20.45±9.29 vs 12.36± 7.28 (p<0.001) in Macintosh and McCoy groups. As compared to baseline maximum change in SBP (mean) was 7.92±10.53 vs 2.80± 6.73 (p= 0.005), the maximum change in DBP (mean) was 9.28±14.74 vs 5.72±7.37 (p= 0.130), the maximum percentage change in MAP (mean) was 8.62±12.07 vs 4.36±7.83 (p=0.039) in Macintosh and McCoy group respectively. Compared to variables just before insertion of the laryngoscope, maximum percentage rise in mean HR was 22.74±10.88 vs 16.40±7.43 (p=0.001), maximum percentage rise in SBP (mean) was 28.31± 13.22 vs 19.41±6.82 (p<0.001), maximum percentage rise in DBP (mean) was 30.00±15.25 vs 24.64±12.21 (p=0.003), maximum percentage rise in MAP (mean) was 28.89±11.55 vs 22.31±11.34 (p=0.05) in Macintosh and McCoy group respectively.\nConclusion: The hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation with McCoy laryngoscope was significantly less than with Macintosh laryngoscope.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v21i1.42382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Laryngoscopy causes exaggerated hemodynamics as tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmias and may have deleterious respiratory, neurological, and cardiovascular effects. A very few studies have compared the effects of various types of laryngoscope blades on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
Methodology: A prospective randomized study was done to compare the hemodynamic response to using McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope. A hundred patients, belonging to ASA grade I and II, between 15-65 years, requiring general anesthesia with intubation were included. A standard anesthesia technique was used. Both groups(n=50) were matched demographically. Mallampati grading, laryngoscopy and intubation time, laryngeal visualization grades, and hemodynamic variables at baseline were comparable.
Result: Following laryngoscopy there was significant rise in heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure. The maximum change in HR compared to baseline was 20.45±9.29 vs 12.36± 7.28 (p<0.001) in Macintosh and McCoy groups. As compared to baseline maximum change in SBP (mean) was 7.92±10.53 vs 2.80± 6.73 (p= 0.005), the maximum change in DBP (mean) was 9.28±14.74 vs 5.72±7.37 (p= 0.130), the maximum percentage change in MAP (mean) was 8.62±12.07 vs 4.36±7.83 (p=0.039) in Macintosh and McCoy group respectively. Compared to variables just before insertion of the laryngoscope, maximum percentage rise in mean HR was 22.74±10.88 vs 16.40±7.43 (p=0.001), maximum percentage rise in SBP (mean) was 28.31± 13.22 vs 19.41±6.82 (p<0.001), maximum percentage rise in DBP (mean) was 30.00±15.25 vs 24.64±12.21 (p=0.003), maximum percentage rise in MAP (mean) was 28.89±11.55 vs 22.31±11.34 (p=0.05) in Macintosh and McCoy group respectively.
Conclusion: The hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation with McCoy laryngoscope was significantly less than with Macintosh laryngoscope.
背景:喉镜检查会导致血流动力学过度,如心动过速、高血压、心律失常,并可能对呼吸、神经和心血管产生有害影响。很少有研究比较了各种类型的喉镜刀片对喉镜和插管的血液动力学反应的影响。方法:进行一项前瞻性随机研究,比较使用McCoy喉镜和Macintosh喉镜的血液动力学反应。纳入了100名患者,属于ASA I级和II级,年龄在15-65岁之间,需要插管全身麻醉。使用了标准的麻醉技术。两组(n=50)在人口学上相匹配。Mallampati分级、喉镜检查和插管时间、喉部可视化分级和基线时的血液动力学变量具有可比性。结果:喉镜检查后心率、收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压均有明显升高。Macintosh和McCoy组的HR与基线相比的最大变化为20.45±9.29,而12.36±7.28(p<0.001)。与基线相比,Macintosh组和McCoy组SBP(平均值)的最大变化分别为7.92±10.53和2.80±6.73(p=0.005),DBP(平均)的最大改变分别为9.28±14.74和5.72±7.37(p=0.030),MAP(均值)的最大百分比变化分别为8.62±12.07和4.36±7.83(p=0.039)。与喉镜插入前的变量相比,平均HR的最大上升百分比为22.74±10.88 vs 16.40±7.43(p=0.001),SBP的最大上升百分率(平均值)为28.31±13.22 vs 19.41±6.82(p<0.001),DBP的最大升高百分比(平均)为30.00±15.25 vs 24.64±12.21(p=0.003),Macintosh组和McCoy组MAP(平均值)的最大上升百分比分别为28.89±11.55和22.31±11.34(p=0.05)。结论:McCoy喉镜对喉镜和插管的血液动力学反应明显低于Macintosh喉镜。