Estimate incidence and predictive factors of pediatric central diabetes insipidus in a single-institute study

Miyuki Kitamura, Junko Nishioka, Takako Matsumoto, Satoko Umino, Atsuko Kawano, Reo Saiki, Yukari Tanaka, Shuichi Yatsuga
{"title":"Estimate incidence and predictive factors of pediatric central diabetes insipidus in a single-institute study","authors":"Miyuki Kitamura,&nbsp;Junko Nishioka,&nbsp;Takako Matsumoto,&nbsp;Satoko Umino,&nbsp;Atsuko Kawano,&nbsp;Reo Saiki,&nbsp;Yukari Tanaka,&nbsp;Shuichi Yatsuga","doi":"10.1016/j.endmts.2022.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study provided a rough estimate incidence of primary pediatric central diabetes insipidus (CDI) and examines the diagnostic factors between pediatric CDI and primary polydipsia (PP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We collected 27 patients with chief complaints of polyuria and/or polydipsia from January 2014 to December 2018 in the Department of Pediatrics, Our University Hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in 16 patients, CDI in 5, PP in 5, and nocturnal enuresis in 1. The rough estimate incidence rate of pediatric CDI was 0.71/100,000/year. The diagnostic factors were a body mass index (BMI), urine gravity in the morning, urine volume and intake volume over 24 h, and bright spots in the posterior pituitary in a magnetic resonance image (MRI). The cutoff value of urine gravity in the morning for CDI was &lt;1.010, with a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 100 %. The cutoff value of urine volume over 24 h for CDI was &gt;2299 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, with a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 85.7 %. No pediatric CDI patients had the bright spot in the posterior pituitary of their MRI, using a type 1–weighted image; however, only 1 out of 4 PP patients did not show the bright spot.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The rough estimate incidence of pediatric CDI with polydipsia and polyuria under the limited condition was 0.71/100,000/year, which was very low. Distinguishable factors between CDI patients and PP patients were BMI, urine and intake volumes over 24 h, and a bright spot on an MRI. Further studies with multiple institutes and more patients are required to confirm these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34427,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine and Metabolic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666396122000024/pdfft?md5=6d56435645bbeb2b8e39a0a5a3ef27b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666396122000024-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine and Metabolic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666396122000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study provided a rough estimate incidence of primary pediatric central diabetes insipidus (CDI) and examines the diagnostic factors between pediatric CDI and primary polydipsia (PP).

Methods

We collected 27 patients with chief complaints of polyuria and/or polydipsia from January 2014 to December 2018 in the Department of Pediatrics, Our University Hospital.

Results

We diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in 16 patients, CDI in 5, PP in 5, and nocturnal enuresis in 1. The rough estimate incidence rate of pediatric CDI was 0.71/100,000/year. The diagnostic factors were a body mass index (BMI), urine gravity in the morning, urine volume and intake volume over 24 h, and bright spots in the posterior pituitary in a magnetic resonance image (MRI). The cutoff value of urine gravity in the morning for CDI was <1.010, with a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 100 %. The cutoff value of urine volume over 24 h for CDI was >2299 mL/m2, with a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 85.7 %. No pediatric CDI patients had the bright spot in the posterior pituitary of their MRI, using a type 1–weighted image; however, only 1 out of 4 PP patients did not show the bright spot.

Conclusion

The rough estimate incidence of pediatric CDI with polydipsia and polyuria under the limited condition was 0.71/100,000/year, which was very low. Distinguishable factors between CDI patients and PP patients were BMI, urine and intake volumes over 24 h, and a bright spot on an MRI. Further studies with multiple institutes and more patients are required to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单机构研究中儿童中枢性尿崩症发病率和预测因素的估计
目的初步估计小儿原发性中枢性尿崩症(CDI)的发病率,探讨小儿CDI与原发性多饮(PP)之间的诊断因素。方法收集2014年1月至2018年12月在我院儿科以多尿和/或烦渴为主诉的患者27例。结果16例诊断为1型糖尿病(T1DM), 5例诊断为CDI, 5例诊断为PP, 1例诊断为夜间遗尿。粗略估计儿童CDI发病率为0.71/10万/年。诊断因素为体重指数(BMI)、晨尿重力、尿量和摄食量大于24 h、磁共振成像(MRI)垂体后叶亮斑。晨尿重力诊断CDI的临界值为1.010,敏感性为100% %,特异性为100% %。尿量大于24 h诊断CDI的临界值为2299 mL/m2,敏感性为100% %,特异性为85.7% %。使用1型加权图像,没有儿童CDI患者的MRI在垂体后叶出现亮点;然而,只有1 / 4的PP患者没有出现亮点。结论限定条件下小儿CDI伴多饮多尿的发生率粗略估计为0.71/10万/年,很低。CDI患者和PP患者之间的可区分因素是BMI、尿液和超过24 h的摄入量,以及MRI上的亮点。进一步的研究需要多个研究所和更多的患者来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine and Metabolic Science
Endocrine and Metabolic Science Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
84 days
期刊最新文献
Long-term diabetic hyperglycaemia modifies social behaviour in rats Platelet activation and inflammation in transgender women using hormone therapy Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among pregnant women in the horn of Africa: A systematic review and Meta-analysis Increase of serum vitamin D levels in the COVID-19 pandemic: Report of a Mexican reference clinical laboratory Hypoalbuminemia on admission in diabetic patients correlates with severity of illness in COVID-19: A retrospective clinical study and literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1