Development of an Interprofessional Handoff Assessment for Doctor of Physical Therapy Students

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1097/JAT.0000000000000196
J. Ronnebaum, Chunfa Jie, Kristina Salazar
{"title":"Development of an Interprofessional Handoff Assessment for Doctor of Physical Therapy Students","authors":"J. Ronnebaum, Chunfa Jie, Kristina Salazar","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Handoff communication, especially interprofessional (IPE) handoff communication, has been shown to make up a large portion of communication errors in health care. There is variability in the way professionals are trained and deliver the pertinent patient information in handoffs, which, causes confusion, makes recall difficult, and increases the incidence of medical errors. Thus, this study aimed at assessing IPE handoffs for individuals who are trained in SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) method of IPE communication developed by TEAM STEPPS®. Method: To assess IPE handoffs for those who are trained with the SBAR method, an existing tool was modified to make it more explicit to IPE handoff communication using descriptors from SBAR. Reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using videos of IPE handoffs of doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students. Results: Spearman rank coefficients for the revised assessment domains ranged from 0.56 to 0.86, indicating a strong correlation. The communication and content domains had the highest level of correlation. The interrater reliability of the 5 raters was 0.85, indicating high reliability. Discussion and Conclusion: This assessment proved to be simple and reliable to measure IPE handoff communication skills during emergent situations between DPT students and standardized nurses. Thus, this assessment can be used to assess interprofessional handoffs, develop competencies improved teamwork, and reduce medical errors.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Handoff communication, especially interprofessional (IPE) handoff communication, has been shown to make up a large portion of communication errors in health care. There is variability in the way professionals are trained and deliver the pertinent patient information in handoffs, which, causes confusion, makes recall difficult, and increases the incidence of medical errors. Thus, this study aimed at assessing IPE handoffs for individuals who are trained in SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) method of IPE communication developed by TEAM STEPPS®. Method: To assess IPE handoffs for those who are trained with the SBAR method, an existing tool was modified to make it more explicit to IPE handoff communication using descriptors from SBAR. Reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using videos of IPE handoffs of doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students. Results: Spearman rank coefficients for the revised assessment domains ranged from 0.56 to 0.86, indicating a strong correlation. The communication and content domains had the highest level of correlation. The interrater reliability of the 5 raters was 0.85, indicating high reliability. Discussion and Conclusion: This assessment proved to be simple and reliable to measure IPE handoff communication skills during emergent situations between DPT students and standardized nurses. Thus, this assessment can be used to assess interprofessional handoffs, develop competencies improved teamwork, and reduce medical errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗专业博士学生跨专业交接评估的发展
背景和目的:切换通信,特别是跨专业(IPE)切换通信,已被证明构成了医疗保健中通信错误的很大一部分。专业人员在交接中接受培训和提供相关患者信息的方式存在差异,这会造成混乱,使回忆变得困难,并增加医疗错误的发生率。因此,本研究旨在评估接受TEAM STEPPS®开发的IPE沟通SBAR(情境、背景、评估和建议)方法培训的个人的IPE移交。方法:为了评估那些使用SBAR方法训练的IPE切换,修改了现有的工具,使其使用SBAR的描述符更明确地进行IPE切换通信。使用物理治疗医生(DPT)学生IPE移交的视频来评估可靠性和内部一致性。结果:修正后的评估领域的Spearman秩系数在0.56至0.86之间,表明具有很强的相关性。通信和内容领域的相关性最高。5名评分者的评分者间信度为0.85,表明信度较高。讨论和结论:该评估被证明是衡量DPT学生和标准化护士在紧急情况下IPE切换沟通技能的简单可靠的方法。因此,这种评估可以用于评估跨专业的交接,发展能力,改善团队合作,减少医疗失误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Creating Value Together: A Triad of Clinicians, Administrators, and Researchers Overcoming Barriers to Unique Valuation of Acute Care Physical Therapy Where Do We Go From Here? An Editor's Update on the Journal Exploring the Addition of Simulation-Based Learning Experiences to Prepare Student Physical Therapist Assistants for Inpatient Clinical Experience Mobility Checklist for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and a Femoral Intra-aortic Balloon Pump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1