Mothering – a mode of protecting rather than parenting in the aftermath of post separation family violence in Australia

Q2 Social Sciences Children Australia Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1017/cha.2020.24
Leanne Francia, P. Millear, R. Sharman
{"title":"Mothering – a mode of protecting rather than parenting in the aftermath of post separation family violence in Australia","authors":"Leanne Francia, P. Millear, R. Sharman","doi":"10.1017/cha.2020.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The focus of this qualitative study was on separated mother’s (N = 36) lived experiences of mothering in the context of post separation family violence and the Australian family law system. Thematic analysis of interviews was guided by a theoretical framework, this being the Three Planets Model. Analysis of the data resulted in two themes relating to mothering being identified. Firstly, that women demonstrated a mode of protecting rather than parenting indicating that mothering was often undertaken in isolation and fear, within an adversarial family law system, and in the presence of a perpetrator of family violence. The second theme related to the aftermath of separation and the long dark shadow cast by family violence. After having left a controlling and violent relationship, separated mothers reported that there was no opportunity to recover, nor to healthily extricate themselves from family violence, which resulted in cumulative harm not only for their wellbeing but also for their children.","PeriodicalId":44896,"journal":{"name":"Children Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cha.2020.24","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The focus of this qualitative study was on separated mother’s (N = 36) lived experiences of mothering in the context of post separation family violence and the Australian family law system. Thematic analysis of interviews was guided by a theoretical framework, this being the Three Planets Model. Analysis of the data resulted in two themes relating to mothering being identified. Firstly, that women demonstrated a mode of protecting rather than parenting indicating that mothering was often undertaken in isolation and fear, within an adversarial family law system, and in the presence of a perpetrator of family violence. The second theme related to the aftermath of separation and the long dark shadow cast by family violence. After having left a controlling and violent relationship, separated mothers reported that there was no opportunity to recover, nor to healthily extricate themselves from family violence, which resulted in cumulative harm not only for their wellbeing but also for their children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母性——澳大利亚分离后家庭暴力后的一种保护而非养育方式
摘要本定性研究的重点是在分居后家庭暴力和澳大利亚家庭法律体系的背景下,分居母亲(N=36)的母亲生活经历。访谈的主题分析是以一个理论框架为指导的,这就是三行星模型。通过对数据的分析,确定了与养育子女有关的两个主题。首先,妇女表现出了一种保护而非养育子女的模式,这表明养育子女往往是在孤立和恐惧的情况下,在敌对的家庭法律体系中,在家庭暴力施暴者在场的情况下进行的。第二个主题涉及分离的后果和家庭暴力造成的长期阴影。在离开了一段控制和暴力的关系后,分居的母亲们报告说,她们没有机会康复,也没有机会健康地从家庭暴力中解脱出来,这不仅对她们的健康造成了累积伤害,也对她们的孩子造成了伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Children Australia
Children Australia SOCIAL WORK-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Notes to Contributors Editorial Poverty and child abuse and neglect CHA volume 45 issue 4 Cover and Front matter Human Services workers’ experiences of rapidly moving to Telehealth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1