Will COVID-19 Make or Break EU State Aid Control? An Analysis of Commission Decisions Authorising Pandemic State Aid Measures

I. Agnolucci
{"title":"Will COVID-19 Make or Break EU State Aid Control? An Analysis of Commission Decisions Authorising Pandemic State Aid Measures","authors":"I. Agnolucci","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpab060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU State aid control has been a tool for the Member States to swiftly counteract the economic losses of the COVID-19 crisis and keep businesses afloat. The present paper assessed how the recent relaxation of EU State aid control by the Temporary Framework for State Aid (TF) has changed the substance and the enforcement of EU State aid rules and whether these changes will have a long-lasting impact on the internal market. An analysis of EU Commission’s Decisions authorising State aid between March and December 2020 shows that the distribution of aid has been geographically disproportionate. Thus, the Temporary Framework might have enhanced disparities between Member States and undermined the level playing field. Second, the study engages with sectoral aid, as to evaluate what sectors have been the most aided by State resources during the pandemic. Evidence shows that the traditional policy objectives, such as environmental policies, research & development & innovation (RDI) and regional aid have been set aside in order to aid companies in financial hardship. Two case studies are further analysed, RDI and the aviation sector. In conclusion, as the Temporary Framework represents a critical junction in the evolution of EU State aid control, the article aims to take stock of the lessons learnt from the Commission Decisions authorising pandemic aid to reflect on the future of EU State aid control and eventually formulate normative recommendations.","PeriodicalId":51907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

EU State aid control has been a tool for the Member States to swiftly counteract the economic losses of the COVID-19 crisis and keep businesses afloat. The present paper assessed how the recent relaxation of EU State aid control by the Temporary Framework for State Aid (TF) has changed the substance and the enforcement of EU State aid rules and whether these changes will have a long-lasting impact on the internal market. An analysis of EU Commission’s Decisions authorising State aid between March and December 2020 shows that the distribution of aid has been geographically disproportionate. Thus, the Temporary Framework might have enhanced disparities between Member States and undermined the level playing field. Second, the study engages with sectoral aid, as to evaluate what sectors have been the most aided by State resources during the pandemic. Evidence shows that the traditional policy objectives, such as environmental policies, research & development & innovation (RDI) and regional aid have been set aside in order to aid companies in financial hardship. Two case studies are further analysed, RDI and the aviation sector. In conclusion, as the Temporary Framework represents a critical junction in the evolution of EU State aid control, the article aims to take stock of the lessons learnt from the Commission Decisions authorising pandemic aid to reflect on the future of EU State aid control and eventually formulate normative recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19将成就或破坏欧盟国家援助控制?委员会授权流行病国家援助措施的决定分析
欧盟国家援助控制一直是成员国迅速抵消COVID-19危机造成的经济损失和维持企业生存的工具。本文评估了最近国家援助临时框架(TF)对欧盟国家援助控制的放松如何改变了欧盟国家援助规则的实质和执行,以及这些变化是否会对内部市场产生长期影响。对欧盟委员会授权在2020年3月至12月期间提供国家援助的决定的分析表明,援助的地理分布不相称。因此,临时框架可能加剧了会员国之间的差距,破坏了公平竞争的环境。第二,该研究涉及部门援助,以评估在大流行病期间哪些部门得到了国家资源最多的援助。有证据表明,传统的政策目标,如环境政策、研发与创新(RDI)和区域援助,已经被搁置一边,以帮助陷入财务困境的公司。进一步分析了RDI和航空部门这两个案例。最后,由于临时框架是欧盟国家援助控制演变过程中的一个关键节点,本文旨在总结从委员会授权大流行病援助的决定中吸取的经验教训,以反思欧盟国家援助控制的未来,并最终制定规范性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The Elephant in the Room Turns Twenty: The Effect on Trade and the Enforcement of the EU Competition Law by the National Competition Authorities Two Paths of Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and the Risk of Fragmentation Parental Liability and Hold-Separate Commitments: Cases 1407-14/1/12/21 Allergan and Others v Competition and Markets Authority, [2023] CAT 56 Reviving Interim Measures in EU Antitrust Proceedings European Commission Requests for Information Ordering the Production of Internal Documents Responsive to Search Terms: Cases T-451/20 and T-452/20 Meta v Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1