Examining the Scoring of Content Integration in a Listening-Speaking Test: A G-Theory Analysis

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Assessment Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-27 DOI:10.1080/15434303.2023.2242334
Rongchan Lin
{"title":"Examining the Scoring of Content Integration in a Listening-Speaking Test: A G-Theory Analysis","authors":"Rongchan Lin","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2023.2242334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Communication in the real world often entails the interpretation, evaluation, and integration of content from different sources. However, it appears that the ability to integrate content into discourse has not been explicitly scored for in existing studies. This study operationalizes content integration in the analytic scoring of a listening-speaking test in Chinese. International students who were non-native speakers of Chinese took the test that comprised two retell tasks and an oral presentation linked by an academic scenario. They were scored for content integration, organization, delivery, and language control for all three tasks. Multivariate generalizability theory (G-theory) was used to investigate the functioning of content integration in the analytic rubric of the retell tasks and oral presentation respectively. Overall, this study aimed to illuminate issues on dependability and construct validity for the two task types, focusing on content integration particularly. The findings suggested that content integration functioned differently to some extent when compared with the other dimensions studied.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2242334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Communication in the real world often entails the interpretation, evaluation, and integration of content from different sources. However, it appears that the ability to integrate content into discourse has not been explicitly scored for in existing studies. This study operationalizes content integration in the analytic scoring of a listening-speaking test in Chinese. International students who were non-native speakers of Chinese took the test that comprised two retell tasks and an oral presentation linked by an academic scenario. They were scored for content integration, organization, delivery, and language control for all three tasks. Multivariate generalizability theory (G-theory) was used to investigate the functioning of content integration in the analytic rubric of the retell tasks and oral presentation respectively. Overall, this study aimed to illuminate issues on dependability and construct validity for the two task types, focusing on content integration particularly. The findings suggested that content integration functioned differently to some extent when compared with the other dimensions studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于g理论的听说考试内容整合评分研究
现实世界中的交流往往需要对不同来源的内容进行解释、评价和整合。然而,在现有的研究中,将内容整合到话语中的能力似乎没有得到明确的评分。本研究将内容整合应用于汉语听说测试的分析性评分。非母语为汉语的国际学生参加的测试包括两个复述任务和一个与学术场景相关的口头陈述。他们对所有三个任务的内容集成、组织、交付和语言控制进行了评分。运用多元概化理论(G-theory)分别研究了内容整合在复述任务和口头陈述分析中的功能。总体而言,本研究旨在阐明两种任务类型的信度和结构效度问题,特别是内容整合问题。研究结果表明,与研究的其他维度相比,内容整合的功能在某种程度上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment The Diagnosis of Writing in a Second or Foreign Language The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks Twenty Years of Language Assessment Quarterly: An Interview with LAQ Founder Antony Kunnan Fundamental Considerations in Technology Mediated Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1