Malaysian crossings: place and language in the worlding of modern Chinese literature

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Asian Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1080/10357823.2023.2208808
Lihai. Tan
{"title":"Malaysian crossings: place and language in the worlding of modern Chinese literature","authors":"Lihai. Tan","doi":"10.1080/10357823.2023.2208808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western music and musicology, and growing global cultural clout are irrelevant here and do not entitle the Republic of Korea to a superior position in the contending regional versions of musical tradition. Koo then runs through ‘the PRC’s institution of its Intangible Cultural Heritage Law’, referencing a law passed in 2011 which, in its own words, aims to ‘maintain the country’s unification and ethnic unity and promote social harmony and sustainable development’. The paradox here is evident: the language of the law by its very nature homogenises, but its implementation also meant, in Koo’s words, that ‘Chaoxianzu kayagum music and Kim Songsam (as a key tradition bearer) as important state cultural heritages and assets ensured the transmission of Chaoxianzu kayagum music in China’. What, then, is the metric against which this positivity can be measured? Koo looks at enrolments at cultural institutions in Yanbian, noting that in the first decade of the 2000s, ‘[the] Yanbian Arts school had seen a drastic decline in the number of students majoring in Chaoxianzu music, both in singing and instruments’. Someone has to keep the tradition alive and evolving, and the classrooms filled, and if the state provides support in those endeavours, it should be taken. The book occasionally slips into specialist vocabulary, but it also includes useful appendices, including an English/Chinese/Korean list of general terms, as well as a trilingual appendix on place names that will be highly useful to those working on the region. This book slots perfectly alongside Keith Howard’s relatively new magnum opus on North Korean music and fills a huge gap in the Korean peninsula musicology focus. It also helps to fill in a deeper sense of the comprehensive reality of minority culture and the state of transnational musical practices in the PRC since that state’s inception. It speaks to the diversity of experiences in Yanbian during the Mao years, and fleshes out details about Yanbian’s cultural growth during the reform or Dengist era. This book is a gem. It merits careful reading and should stimulate further work in the fields of ethnomusicology, Korean history, Korean diaspora studies, the history of music and politics in Northeast China, and borderlands and Korean studies.","PeriodicalId":46499,"journal":{"name":"Asian Studies Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"640 - 642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2208808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Western music and musicology, and growing global cultural clout are irrelevant here and do not entitle the Republic of Korea to a superior position in the contending regional versions of musical tradition. Koo then runs through ‘the PRC’s institution of its Intangible Cultural Heritage Law’, referencing a law passed in 2011 which, in its own words, aims to ‘maintain the country’s unification and ethnic unity and promote social harmony and sustainable development’. The paradox here is evident: the language of the law by its very nature homogenises, but its implementation also meant, in Koo’s words, that ‘Chaoxianzu kayagum music and Kim Songsam (as a key tradition bearer) as important state cultural heritages and assets ensured the transmission of Chaoxianzu kayagum music in China’. What, then, is the metric against which this positivity can be measured? Koo looks at enrolments at cultural institutions in Yanbian, noting that in the first decade of the 2000s, ‘[the] Yanbian Arts school had seen a drastic decline in the number of students majoring in Chaoxianzu music, both in singing and instruments’. Someone has to keep the tradition alive and evolving, and the classrooms filled, and if the state provides support in those endeavours, it should be taken. The book occasionally slips into specialist vocabulary, but it also includes useful appendices, including an English/Chinese/Korean list of general terms, as well as a trilingual appendix on place names that will be highly useful to those working on the region. This book slots perfectly alongside Keith Howard’s relatively new magnum opus on North Korean music and fills a huge gap in the Korean peninsula musicology focus. It also helps to fill in a deeper sense of the comprehensive reality of minority culture and the state of transnational musical practices in the PRC since that state’s inception. It speaks to the diversity of experiences in Yanbian during the Mao years, and fleshes out details about Yanbian’s cultural growth during the reform or Dengist era. This book is a gem. It merits careful reading and should stimulate further work in the fields of ethnomusicology, Korean history, Korean diaspora studies, the history of music and politics in Northeast China, and borderlands and Korean studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚穿越:中国现代文学世界中的位置与语言
西方音乐和音乐学以及日益增长的全球文化影响力在这里无关紧要,也不能使大韩民国在音乐传统的地区版本中享有优越地位。Koo随后浏览了“中华人民共和国非物质文化遗产法”,引用了2011年通过的一项法律,用他自己的话说,该法律旨在“维护国家统一和民族团结,促进社会和谐和可持续发展”。这里的悖论是显而易见的:法律的语言本质上是同质的,但它的实施也意味着,用辜的话来说,“朝鲜族kayagum音乐和金松三(作为一个关键的传统载体)作为重要的国家文化遗产和资产,确保了朝鲜族卡亚gum音乐在中国的传播”。那么,衡量这种积极性的标准是什么呢?Koo观察了延边文化机构的招生情况,指出在21世纪初的前十年,“延边艺术学校的朝鲜族音乐专业学生人数急剧下降,无论是歌唱还是乐器”。必须有人保持这一传统的生命力和发展,让教室充满活力,如果国家在这些努力中提供支持,就应该采取行动。这本书偶尔会用到专业词汇,但它也包括有用的附录,包括英语/汉语/韩语的通用术语列表,以及一个关于地名的三语附录,这对该地区的工作人员非常有用。这本书与基思·霍华德关于朝鲜音乐的相对较新的代表作完美结合,填补了朝鲜半岛音乐学关注的巨大空白。这也有助于更深入地了解中华人民共和国建国以来少数民族文化的综合现实和跨国音乐实践的状况。它讲述了毛时代延边经历的多样性,并充实了延边在改革或邓时代文化发展的细节。这本书是一颗宝石。它值得仔细阅读,并应促进在民族音乐学、朝鲜历史、朝鲜侨民研究、中国东北音乐与政治史、边疆与朝鲜研究等领域的进一步工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Objectification, Bodily Revenge, and National Identity: Refashioning ‘Comfort Women’ in Chinese Cinema Migration, Vulnerability, and Protection: Changing Labour Law Regime in Contemporary India BOOK REVIEW Humour in Asian cultures: tradition and context , edited by Jessica Milner Davis, Routledge, 2022, 336 pp., £145.00 (hardback), £35.09 (eBook) The Shadow Economy and Social Change in North Korea BOOK REVIEW Xi Jinping’s China: the personal and the political , by Stig Stenslie & Marte Kjær Galtung, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2023, 179 pp., US$95.00 (hardback)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1