Objecthood, Flat Form, Political Formalism: OOO and Ben Lerner’s Hatred of Poetry

C. Moraru
{"title":"Objecthood, Flat Form, Political Formalism: OOO and Ben Lerner’s Hatred of Poetry","authors":"C. Moraru","doi":"10.24193/MJCST.2021.11.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a largely theoretical essay that, in conversation with Graham Harman’s energetic view of objects and Ben Lerner’s idiosyncratic theory of poetry, articulates the basic tenets of a “flat aesthetics” and then moves on to tease out this aesthetics’ ramifications in terms of form, reading thereof, and politics. When the object’s ontological dignity is acknowledged, as flat ontology does, and further, when literature too is dealt with as an object whose “intransitive” objecthood is recognized, literary form, Moraru argues, no longer reflects an elsewhere, a beyond, or other transcendent place, meaning, or design. Instead, this form deflects clarifying light “prismatically,” illuminating other objects, the bigger ensembles into which they are arranged, as well as the potential for new arrangements and worlds. Drawing from Lerner’s Hatred of Poetry, the article’s closing segment explains how this potentiality is already embedded in form qua object and sprouts dialectically from the limits within which literary forms inherently coalesce.","PeriodicalId":36476,"journal":{"name":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/MJCST.2021.11.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a largely theoretical essay that, in conversation with Graham Harman’s energetic view of objects and Ben Lerner’s idiosyncratic theory of poetry, articulates the basic tenets of a “flat aesthetics” and then moves on to tease out this aesthetics’ ramifications in terms of form, reading thereof, and politics. When the object’s ontological dignity is acknowledged, as flat ontology does, and further, when literature too is dealt with as an object whose “intransitive” objecthood is recognized, literary form, Moraru argues, no longer reflects an elsewhere, a beyond, or other transcendent place, meaning, or design. Instead, this form deflects clarifying light “prismatically,” illuminating other objects, the bigger ensembles into which they are arranged, as well as the potential for new arrangements and worlds. Drawing from Lerner’s Hatred of Poetry, the article’s closing segment explains how this potentiality is already embedded in form qua object and sprouts dialectically from the limits within which literary forms inherently coalesce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客体性、扁平形式、政治形式主义:《OOO》与本·勒纳的《诗歌之恨》
这是一篇以理论为主的文章,在与格雷厄姆·哈曼(Graham Harman)充满活力的物体观和本·勒纳(Ben Lerner)独特的诗歌理论的对话中,阐述了“平面美学”的基本原则,然后梳理了这种美学在形式、阅读和政治方面的影响。当对象的本体论尊严得到承认时,就像平面本体论一样,而且当文学也被视为一个“不及物”对象性得到承认的对象时,莫拉鲁认为,文学形式不再反映一个别处、一个超越或其他超越的地方、意义或设计。相反,这种形式“棱镜式”偏转澄清光,照亮其他物体,它们被排列成更大的整体,以及新排列和世界的潜力。文章的结尾部分借鉴了勒纳的《诗歌的仇恨》,解释了这种潜力是如何嵌入作为客体的形式中的,并从文学形式固有的结合范围中辩证地萌芽出来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Racialized Modernity in Late-Nineteenth-Century Romanian Literature Worlding the Japanese Literature. The Long Road from the Periphery to Internationalisation In the Literary Neighborhood: The Translated Romanian Novel in (Ex-)Yugoslavia (1918-2020) Jewish Literature & World Literature. Unlearning (Trans)Nationalism Travelling Theory-Fiction. A Romanian Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1