Home sweet home: Quantifying home court advantages for NCAA basketball statistics

IF 0.6 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Sports Analytics Pub Date : 2019-09-11 DOI:10.3233/JSA-200450
M. V. Bommel, L. Bornn, Peter A. Chow-White, Chuancong Gao
{"title":"Home sweet home: Quantifying home court advantages for NCAA basketball statistics","authors":"M. V. Bommel, L. Bornn, Peter A. Chow-White, Chuancong Gao","doi":"10.3233/JSA-200450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Box score statistics are the baseline measures of performance for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball. Between the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 seasons, NCAA teams performed better at home compared to on the road in nearly all box score statistics across both genders and all three divisions. Using box score data from over 100,000 games spanning the three divisions for both women and men, we examine the factors underlying this discrepancy. The prevalence of neutral location games in the NCAA provides an additional angle through which to examine the gaps in box score statistic performance, which we believe has been underutilized in existing literature. We also estimate a regression model to quantify the home court advantages for box score statistics after controlling for other factors such as number of possessions, and team strength. Additionally, we examine the biases of scorekeepers and referees. We present evidence that scorekeepers tend to have greater home team biases when observing men compared to women, higher divisions compared to lower divisions, and stronger teams compared to weaker teams. Finally, we present statistically significant results indicating referee decisions are impacted by attendance, with larger crowds resulting in greater bias in favor of the home team.","PeriodicalId":53203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Analytics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/JSA-200450","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JSA-200450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Box score statistics are the baseline measures of performance for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball. Between the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 seasons, NCAA teams performed better at home compared to on the road in nearly all box score statistics across both genders and all three divisions. Using box score data from over 100,000 games spanning the three divisions for both women and men, we examine the factors underlying this discrepancy. The prevalence of neutral location games in the NCAA provides an additional angle through which to examine the gaps in box score statistic performance, which we believe has been underutilized in existing literature. We also estimate a regression model to quantify the home court advantages for box score statistics after controlling for other factors such as number of possessions, and team strength. Additionally, we examine the biases of scorekeepers and referees. We present evidence that scorekeepers tend to have greater home team biases when observing men compared to women, higher divisions compared to lower divisions, and stronger teams compared to weaker teams. Finally, we present statistically significant results indicating referee decisions are impacted by attendance, with larger crowds resulting in greater bias in favor of the home team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主场甜蜜主场:NCAA篮球统计数据的主场优势量化
框得分统计数据是衡量美国大学生体育协会(NCAA)篮球表现的基线指标。2011-2012赛季至2015-2016赛季,在几乎所有性别和所有三个赛区的得分统计数据中,NCAA球队在主场的表现都优于在客场的表现。使用来自三个赛区超过100000场比赛的女性和男性的得分数据,我们研究了造成这种差异的因素。中立位置游戏在NCAA中的普遍性提供了一个额外的角度,通过这个角度来检查盒子得分统计性能的差距,我们认为现有文献中没有充分利用这一点。在控制了其他因素(如控球次数和球队实力)后,我们还估计了一个回归模型,以量化主场优势,用于得分统计。此外,我们还考察了记分员和裁判的偏见。我们提供的证据表明,记分员在观察男性与女性、高级别与低级别、强队与弱队时,往往有更大的主队偏见。最后,我们给出了具有统计意义的结果,表明裁判的判罚受到上座率的影响,观众人数越多,对主队的偏见就越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A goal-aligned coordinate system for invasion games Determining the playing 11 based on opposition squad: An IPL illustration Community structure of the football transfer market network: the case of Italian Serie A Decision making for basketball clutch shots: A data driven approach How to schedule the Volleyball Nations League
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1