Does psychiatric comorbidity influences quality of life and disability among subjects with refractory focal epilepsy- a comparative cross-sectional study

V. Vipin, Praveeen Arathil
{"title":"Does psychiatric comorbidity influences quality of life and disability among subjects with refractory focal epilepsy- a comparative cross-sectional study","authors":"V. Vipin, Praveeen Arathil","doi":"10.30834/KJP.34.2.2021.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Refractory focal epilepsy is a disorder associated with a significant impact on quality of life and disability. Having comorbid psychiatric disorders among these subjects has been well documented. Recently studies have looked at how this impacts the quality of life and disability, but they are few in number. Methodology: Subjects were taken from the epilepsy clinic whom neurologist diagnosed as having refractory focal epilepsy. MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to identify psychiatric comorbidity. Two groups of 25 subjects were made based on whether they had or did not have psychiatric comorbidities and further assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF for quality of life and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for disability. Results: Analysis of the two groups showed quality of life score lesser in the group with psychiatric comorbidities, which was significant (p<0.001). Similarly, the disability score was higher in the group with psychiatric comorbidities, which was significant (p<0.001).  The quality of life was lowest in major depressive disorder (60.80±8.47) and disability was highest in psychosis (105.33±1.53). Conclusion: Psychiatric comorbidities in subjects with refractory focal epilepsy significantly impact the quality of life and disability. It is essential to have a good team approach, and liaison between neurology and psychiatry for early detection and treatment of such symptoms will decrease healthcare costs and improve quality of life.","PeriodicalId":31047,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30834/KJP.34.2.2021.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractory focal epilepsy is a disorder associated with a significant impact on quality of life and disability. Having comorbid psychiatric disorders among these subjects has been well documented. Recently studies have looked at how this impacts the quality of life and disability, but they are few in number. Methodology: Subjects were taken from the epilepsy clinic whom neurologist diagnosed as having refractory focal epilepsy. MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to identify psychiatric comorbidity. Two groups of 25 subjects were made based on whether they had or did not have psychiatric comorbidities and further assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF for quality of life and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for disability. Results: Analysis of the two groups showed quality of life score lesser in the group with psychiatric comorbidities, which was significant (p<0.001). Similarly, the disability score was higher in the group with psychiatric comorbidities, which was significant (p<0.001).  The quality of life was lowest in major depressive disorder (60.80±8.47) and disability was highest in psychosis (105.33±1.53). Conclusion: Psychiatric comorbidities in subjects with refractory focal epilepsy significantly impact the quality of life and disability. It is essential to have a good team approach, and liaison between neurology and psychiatry for early detection and treatment of such symptoms will decrease healthcare costs and improve quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神共病是否影响难治性局灶性癫痫患者的生活质量和残疾?一项横断面比较研究
背景:难治性局灶性癫痫是一种对生活质量和残疾有重大影响的疾病。在这些受试者中有共病性精神障碍已经有很好的记录。最近的研究关注了这对生活质量和残疾的影响,但数量很少。方法:受试者取自癫痫门诊,经神经科医生诊断为难治性局灶性癫痫。MINI国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI)用于确定精神疾病的共病。根据受试者是否有或没有精神合并症分为两组,每组25人,并进一步使用世界卫生组织生活质量(WHOQOL)-BREF(生活质量)和世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)进行残疾评估。结果:两组分析显示,有精神合并症组的生活质量评分较低,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。同样,精神合并症组的残疾评分较高,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。重度抑郁症患者生活质量最低(60.80±8.47),精神病患者生活质量最高(105.33±1.53)。结论:难治性局灶性癫痫患者的精神合并症显著影响其生活质量和残疾。有一个良好的团队方法是至关重要的,神经病学和精神病学之间的联系,以早期发现和治疗这些症状,将降低医疗保健成本,提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retraction of “Psychosomatic problems in caregivers of patients with major mental illnesses.” Letters commenting on published articles: Last but not the least Lithium memoirs Holism is central to psychiatric practice Cognitive dysfunction in male inpatients with alcohol dependence: A comparative cross-sectional study from South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1