Diagnostic value of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI compared with that of biparametric MRI for the detection of prostate cancer

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Prostate International Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2022.03.003
Yuping Zeng , Xiaoming Leng , Hengbin Liao , Guihua Jiang , Ping Chen
{"title":"Diagnostic value of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI compared with that of biparametric MRI for the detection of prostate cancer","authors":"Yuping Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Leng ,&nbsp;Hengbin Liao ,&nbsp;Guihua Jiang ,&nbsp;Ping Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the diagnostic value of fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 Positron emission tomography/Magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) and compared with that of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study enrolled 29 patients with suspected PCa preoperatively who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and subsequent targeted biopsy for suspected PCa lesions. Two readers independently assessed the images of each suspected PCa lesion and determined their overall assessment category on bpMRI and <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI. By using biopsy histopathology as the reference standard, the accuracies of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and bpMRI for the detection of PCa lesion were determined. Furthermore, the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of their semi-quantitative parameters of the optimal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for detecting PCa lesions were derived, and their correlations with the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 48 suspected PCa lesions in 29 patients, 38 were pathologically diagnosed with clinically significant PCa and 10 with nonprostate cancer (non-PCa) lesions. Compared with the pathological results, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI demonstrated much greater diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than bpMRI: 0.974 versus 0.711, 94.74% versus 92.11%, 100% versus 50%, 100% versus 87.50%, and 83.33% versus 62.50%, respectively. The semi-quantitative parameters of SUVmax demonstrated a higher AUC of 0.874 than that of ADC with 0.776 for detecting PCa. The ISUP grade was positively associated with SUVmax at spearman’s rho correlation coefficient (Rho) = 0.539, p = 0), but not associated with ADC (Rho = −0.105, p = 0.529).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The diagnostic value of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI for the detection of PCa is better than that of bpMRI, and a high SUVmax may indicate a lesion with a high ISUP grade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000162/pdfft?md5=0c3988dded48189e5135f16ea1f6c926&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888222000162-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of fluorine 18 (18F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 Positron emission tomography/Magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) and compared with that of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

The study enrolled 29 patients with suspected PCa preoperatively who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and subsequent targeted biopsy for suspected PCa lesions. Two readers independently assessed the images of each suspected PCa lesion and determined their overall assessment category on bpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI. By using biopsy histopathology as the reference standard, the accuracies of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and bpMRI for the detection of PCa lesion were determined. Furthermore, the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of their semi-quantitative parameters of the optimal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for detecting PCa lesions were derived, and their correlations with the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade were reported.

Results

Of the 48 suspected PCa lesions in 29 patients, 38 were pathologically diagnosed with clinically significant PCa and 10 with nonprostate cancer (non-PCa) lesions. Compared with the pathological results, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI demonstrated much greater diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than bpMRI: 0.974 versus 0.711, 94.74% versus 92.11%, 100% versus 50%, 100% versus 87.50%, and 83.33% versus 62.50%, respectively. The semi-quantitative parameters of SUVmax demonstrated a higher AUC of 0.874 than that of ADC with 0.776 for detecting PCa. The ISUP grade was positively associated with SUVmax at spearman’s rho correlation coefficient (Rho) = 0.539, p = 0), but not associated with ADC (Rho = −0.105, p = 0.529).

Conclusion

The diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI for the detection of PCa is better than that of bpMRI, and a high SUVmax may indicate a lesion with a high ISUP grade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI与双参数MRI对前列腺癌的诊断价值比较
目的评价氟18 (18F)标记前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-1007正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)对前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断价值,并与双参数MRI (bpMRI)进行比较。材料和方法本研究招募了29例疑似PCa患者,术前接受了18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI检查,随后进行了疑似PCa病变的靶向活检。两位读者独立评估每个疑似PCa病变的图像,并确定其在bpMRI和18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI上的总体评估类别。以活检组织病理学为参考标准,确定18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI和bpMRI对PCa病变检测的准确性。此外,我们还推导了用于检测前列腺癌病变的最佳标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和表观扩散系数(ADC)的半定量参数的接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并报道了它们与国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级的相关性。结果29例患者48例疑似前列腺癌病变中,病理诊断为临床显著性前列腺癌38例,非前列腺癌10例。与病理结果相比,18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI的诊断准确率(曲线下面积,AUC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均明显高于bpMRI:分别为0.974比0.711、94.74%比92.11%、100%比50%、100%比87.50%、83.33%比62.50%。SUVmax半定量参数检测PCa的AUC值为0.874,高于ADC的0.776。ISUP分级与SUVmax呈正相关,spearman相关系数(rho) = 0.539, p = 0),但与ADC无关(rho = - 0.105, p = 0.529)。结论18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI对PCa的诊断价值优于bpMRI,且SUVmax值高可能提示病变ISUP分级高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer” [Prostate Int 11 (2023) 150–158] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging The association between inflammatory bowel disease and risk of prostate cancer: a population-based retrospective study based on Korean National Health Insurance Service database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1