Branded vs. Generic drugs: the role of self-perceived seriousness of disease

Andrea Sestino, Cesare Amatulli
{"title":"Branded vs. Generic drugs: the role of self-perceived seriousness of disease","authors":"Andrea Sestino, Cesare Amatulli","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-10-2020-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims at exploring the role of perceived disease seriousness in consumers’ preference for generic versus branded drugs, by shedding light on new factors impacting consumer purchase behaviour for pharmaceutical products.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn exploratory study based on a quantitative analysis has been conducted with a sample of 100 participants who have been presented with two different scenarios: one related to more serious disease (as in cardiological disease) and one related to less serious disease (as in the seasonal flu). This paper considered Italy as a research setting where the recent mandatory prescription of the active ingredient by doctors leaves the final purchase decision in consumers’ hands\n\n\nFindings\nResults show that, although consumers are free to choose whether to buy a branded or a generic prescribed active ingredient, their choice is mainly driven by the role of the brand. Consumers’ intention to buy generic drugs is higher in the case of diseases perceived as less serious, while the intention to buy branded drugs is higher in the case of disease perceived as more serious.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to marketing research and practice by proposing that consumers’ perceived seriousness of their disease should be considered as a further factor in identifying new marketing strategies in those contexts in which the choice between branded or generic drugs is free.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-10-2020-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This study aims at exploring the role of perceived disease seriousness in consumers’ preference for generic versus branded drugs, by shedding light on new factors impacting consumer purchase behaviour for pharmaceutical products. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory study based on a quantitative analysis has been conducted with a sample of 100 participants who have been presented with two different scenarios: one related to more serious disease (as in cardiological disease) and one related to less serious disease (as in the seasonal flu). This paper considered Italy as a research setting where the recent mandatory prescription of the active ingredient by doctors leaves the final purchase decision in consumers’ hands Findings Results show that, although consumers are free to choose whether to buy a branded or a generic prescribed active ingredient, their choice is mainly driven by the role of the brand. Consumers’ intention to buy generic drugs is higher in the case of diseases perceived as less serious, while the intention to buy branded drugs is higher in the case of disease perceived as more serious. Originality/value This study contributes to marketing research and practice by proposing that consumers’ perceived seriousness of their disease should be considered as a further factor in identifying new marketing strategies in those contexts in which the choice between branded or generic drugs is free.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
品牌药与非专利药:疾病自我认知严重性的作用
目的本研究旨在通过揭示影响消费者购买药品行为的新因素,探讨感知疾病严重性在消费者对仿制药与品牌药偏好中的作用。设计/方法/方法一项基于定量分析的探索性研究对100名参与者进行了抽样,他们被呈现出两种不同的情景:一种与更严重的疾病有关(如心脏病),另一种与不太严重的疾病相关(如季节性流感)。本文将意大利视为一个研究环境,在那里,医生最近对活性成分的强制性处方将最终购买决定权交给了消费者。结果表明,尽管消费者可以自由选择购买品牌或非专利处方活性成分,但他们的选择主要受品牌作用的驱动。在被认为不太严重的疾病情况下,消费者购买仿制药的意愿更高,而在被认为更严重的疾病的情况下,购买品牌药物的意愿更大。独创性/价值本研究提出,在品牌药或仿制药之间可以自由选择的情况下,消费者对疾病的严重性应被视为确定新营销策略的进一步因素,从而有助于营销研究和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Progress and trends in healthcare marketing strategy (2018–2022): A descriptive and bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science (WOS) dataset Modelling organ donation information adoption among Malaysian youth using the information adoption model (IAM) The impact of word-of-mouth (WOM) on attitudes, behavioural intentions, and actual usage of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) among early and late adopters Does the pharmaceutical industry’s growth relate to Bangladesh’s macroeconomic stability? Food as an ingredient of well-being: from food and well-being to food well-being (FWB): a comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1