Endoscopic management of complications—endovacuum for management of anastomotic leakages: a narrative review

C. Mann, F. Berlth, E. Tagkalos, E. Hadzijusufoviç, H. Lang, P. Grimminger
{"title":"Endoscopic management of complications—endovacuum for management of anastomotic leakages: a narrative review","authors":"C. Mann, F. Berlth, E. Tagkalos, E. Hadzijusufoviç, H. Lang, P. Grimminger","doi":"10.21037/AOE-21-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy are common, yet threatening complications. Possible leakage therapy ranges from reoperation to interventional treatments like stent placement or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) supported by optimized conservative therapy, ideally at an intensive care unit. Since reoperation is concomitant with high mortality, conservative and interventional therapies are applied on a frequent basis nowadays. Apart from the well-established endoscopic placement of a self-expanding-metal stent (SEMS), the EVAC has been successfully implemented in many centers in recent years. Using the same principles as subcutaneous vacuum therapy, it offers many advantages such as simultaneous drainage therapy and faster healing process. The healing process is supported by controlling the infection of the wound, promoting macro- and microdeformation of the adjacent tissue, and improvement of perfusion. Still, clear evidence about superiority of one interventional therapy strategy—either SEMS or EVAC—is lacking. This article describes the principle and the procedure of EVAC for anastomotic leakages. Current literature regarding efficiency, safety, and possible costs in comparison to SEMS therapy is reviewed. Considering the advantages EVAC therapy is offering, its value for anastomotic leakage therapy is clear. However, to reach standardized clinical application, additional research to improve the applicability and economic efficiency should be conducted.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-21-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: Anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy are common, yet threatening complications. Possible leakage therapy ranges from reoperation to interventional treatments like stent placement or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVAC) supported by optimized conservative therapy, ideally at an intensive care unit. Since reoperation is concomitant with high mortality, conservative and interventional therapies are applied on a frequent basis nowadays. Apart from the well-established endoscopic placement of a self-expanding-metal stent (SEMS), the EVAC has been successfully implemented in many centers in recent years. Using the same principles as subcutaneous vacuum therapy, it offers many advantages such as simultaneous drainage therapy and faster healing process. The healing process is supported by controlling the infection of the wound, promoting macro- and microdeformation of the adjacent tissue, and improvement of perfusion. Still, clear evidence about superiority of one interventional therapy strategy—either SEMS or EVAC—is lacking. This article describes the principle and the procedure of EVAC for anastomotic leakages. Current literature regarding efficiency, safety, and possible costs in comparison to SEMS therapy is reviewed. Considering the advantages EVAC therapy is offering, its value for anastomotic leakage therapy is clear. However, to reach standardized clinical application, additional research to improve the applicability and economic efficiency should be conducted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并发症的内镜处理-吻合口瘘的内镜处理:叙述性回顾
食管切除术后吻合口漏是一种常见但危险的并发症。可能的渗漏治疗范围从再手术到介入治疗,如支架置入术或内镜真空治疗(EVAC),辅以优化的保守治疗,理想情况下在重症监护病房进行。由于再手术死亡率高,保守和介入治疗是目前常用的治疗方法。除了在内镜下放置自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)之外,EVAC近年来已在许多中心成功实施。使用与皮下真空治疗相同的原理,它具有许多优点,如同时引流治疗和更快的愈合过程。通过控制伤口感染、促进邻近组织的宏观和微观变形以及改善灌注来支持愈合过程。尽管如此,仍然缺乏明确的证据证明一种介入治疗策略的优越性——无论是SEMS还是evaca。本文介绍了EVAC治疗吻合口瘘的原理和步骤。与SEMS治疗相比,目前有关效率、安全性和可能成本的文献进行了回顾。考虑到EVAC治疗所具有的优势,其在吻合口漏治疗中的价值是显而易见的。然而,为了达到规范的临床应用,还需要进一步研究以提高适用性和经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1