COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE MECHANOCHEMICAL ENDOVENOUS ABLATION OF GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN USING POLYDOCANOL FOAM OF ROOM TEMPERATURE AND COOLED ONE

Q4 Medicine Novosti Khirurgii Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.18484/2305-0047.2021.6.690
N. Shestak, I. Klimchuk, V. Khryshchanovich
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE MECHANOCHEMICAL ENDOVENOUS ABLATION OF GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN USING POLYDOCANOL FOAM OF ROOM TEMPERATURE AND COOLED ONE","authors":"N. Shestak, I. Klimchuk, V. Khryshchanovich","doi":"10.18484/2305-0047.2021.6.690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of long-term (3-yars) results of varicose veins treatment by mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) with using polidocanol foam of room temperature and a chilled one. Methods. The study is based on the treatment results of 122 patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. In the main group (n=60), mechano-chemical ablation was performed according to original technique, using a cooled sclerosant, 60ᵒ degrees leg elevation and a shin bandage; in the comparison group (n=62) standard technique was used. The median GSV diameter in the main group was Me (Q25; Q75) = 7.4 (5.8; 8.2) mm, in the comparison group - Me (Q25; Q75) = 7.3 (5.6; 8.3) mm (P=0.794). Results. One month after the surgery, the GSV was totally occluded in 100% cases in the main and in 96.7% cases in the comparison group (P=0.496). One year after the surgery, occlusion rates were 94.6% and 80.4% respectively (P=0.042). 3 years later, GSV occlusion was diagnosed in 92.6% cases and in 76.4% cases, respectively (P=0.0033). Hyperpigmentation was reported in 21.7% legs in the main group and 22.6% legs in the comparison group (P>0,99). Transient superficial phlebitis developed in 6.7% and in 8.1% legs, respectively (P=0.744). Conclusion. Endovenous mechanochemical cryoablation is more effective than the standard MOCA technique and can be considered as the most preferable method for eliminating reflux in the GSV. What this paper adds A comparative safety and efficacy of the endovenous mechanochemical cryoablation in comparison with the standard technique to eliminate GSV reflux has been evaluated for the first time. A small number of complications and significant positive dynamics of clinical symptoms were reported in both groups. After 3 years, GSV recanalization rate was 3.2 times higher using the standard technique.","PeriodicalId":38373,"journal":{"name":"Novosti Khirurgii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosti Khirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2021.6.690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of long-term (3-yars) results of varicose veins treatment by mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) with using polidocanol foam of room temperature and a chilled one. Methods. The study is based on the treatment results of 122 patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. In the main group (n=60), mechano-chemical ablation was performed according to original technique, using a cooled sclerosant, 60ᵒ degrees leg elevation and a shin bandage; in the comparison group (n=62) standard technique was used. The median GSV diameter in the main group was Me (Q25; Q75) = 7.4 (5.8; 8.2) mm, in the comparison group - Me (Q25; Q75) = 7.3 (5.6; 8.3) mm (P=0.794). Results. One month after the surgery, the GSV was totally occluded in 100% cases in the main and in 96.7% cases in the comparison group (P=0.496). One year after the surgery, occlusion rates were 94.6% and 80.4% respectively (P=0.042). 3 years later, GSV occlusion was diagnosed in 92.6% cases and in 76.4% cases, respectively (P=0.0033). Hyperpigmentation was reported in 21.7% legs in the main group and 22.6% legs in the comparison group (P>0,99). Transient superficial phlebitis developed in 6.7% and in 8.1% legs, respectively (P=0.744). Conclusion. Endovenous mechanochemical cryoablation is more effective than the standard MOCA technique and can be considered as the most preferable method for eliminating reflux in the GSV. What this paper adds A comparative safety and efficacy of the endovenous mechanochemical cryoablation in comparison with the standard technique to eliminate GSV reflux has been evaluated for the first time. A small number of complications and significant positive dynamics of clinical symptoms were reported in both groups. After 3 years, GSV recanalization rate was 3.2 times higher using the standard technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
室温与冷却泡沫聚多酚机械化学大隐静脉内消融效果的比较分析
客观的对机械化学静脉内消融术(MOCA)与室温和冷冻聚多醇泡沫治疗静脉曲张的长期(3年)结果进行比较分析。方法。本研究基于122例大隐静脉(GSV)功能不全患者的治疗结果。将患者随机分为2组。在主要组(n=60)中,根据原始技术,使用冷却的硬化剂进行机械化学消融,60ᵒ 度腿抬高和胫骨绷带;对照组(n=62)采用标准技术。主要组的GSV中值直径为Me(Q25;Q75)=7.4(5.8;8.2)mm,而对照组为Me(Q15;Q75%)=7.3(5.6;8.3)mm(P=0.794)。术后1个月,GSV完全闭塞的病例主要为100%,对照组为96.7%(P=0.0496)。术后1年,闭塞率分别为94.6%和80.4%(P=0.042)。3年后,诊断为GSV闭塞的病例分别为92.6%和76.4%,主要组21.7%的腿和对照组22.6%的腿出现色素沉着过度(P>0.99)。短暂性浅静脉炎发生率分别为6.7%和8.1%(P=0.744)。静脉内机械化学冷冻消融比标准MOCA技术更有效,可以被认为是消除GSV回流的最优选方法。本文首次评估了静脉内机械化学冷冻消融与消除GSV反流的标准技术相比的比较安全性和有效性。两组均报告了少量并发症和显著的临床症状动态变化。3年后,GSV再通率是标准技术的3.2倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Novosti Khirurgii
Novosti Khirurgii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF SILVER NANOPARTICLES ASSESSMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION SEVERITY IN LIVER CIRROSIS PREVENTION OF SUTURE INSUFFICIENCY IN INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSES VERTICAL RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE FLAP FOR REPAIR OF THE ANTERIOR CHEST WALL DEFECT STRUCTURE OF MICROFLORA AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE TRENDS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT OF A MULTIDISCIPLINE INSTITUTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1