Towards a theory of action: ontology and politics as foundations of Herbert Marcuse’s dialectical phenomenology

Juliano Bonamigo Ferreira de Souza
{"title":"Towards a theory of action: ontology and politics as foundations of Herbert Marcuse’s dialectical phenomenology","authors":"Juliano Bonamigo Ferreira de Souza","doi":"10.17533/udea.ef.n62a06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to analyze the modes of composition of the so-called dialectical phenomenology, proposed by Herbert Marcuse in 1928. It is one of his first writings, in which the author seeks to think of a theory of action whose starting point are the historical analyses derived from the historical materialism of Marx and Engels, orchestrated with the existential analytic provided by Being and time, by Heidegger. In order to interpret this pioneering philosophical architecture, (1) we will first show how Marcusean method establishes the understanding of a historical situation. (2) In the second section, we analyze how Marcuse interprets, in a very original way, the ontological aspects of Dasein. (3) In the last part, it is about showing how Marcuse operates a junction of both analyses in order to argue the need for a transforming action on the unveiled social alienation. Together, these three movements seek to emphasize the social concern that has always occupied Herbert Marcuse’s philosophical reflections.","PeriodicalId":32344,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n62a06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to analyze the modes of composition of the so-called dialectical phenomenology, proposed by Herbert Marcuse in 1928. It is one of his first writings, in which the author seeks to think of a theory of action whose starting point are the historical analyses derived from the historical materialism of Marx and Engels, orchestrated with the existential analytic provided by Being and time, by Heidegger. In order to interpret this pioneering philosophical architecture, (1) we will first show how Marcusean method establishes the understanding of a historical situation. (2) In the second section, we analyze how Marcuse interprets, in a very original way, the ontological aspects of Dasein. (3) In the last part, it is about showing how Marcuse operates a junction of both analyses in order to argue the need for a transforming action on the unveiled social alienation. Together, these three movements seek to emphasize the social concern that has always occupied Herbert Marcuse’s philosophical reflections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向行动论:作为马尔库塞辩证现象学基础的本体论和政治学
本文试图分析赫伯特·马尔库塞于1928年提出的所谓辩证现象学的构成模式。这是他最早的著作之一,作者试图思考一种行动理论,其出发点是马克思和恩格斯的历史唯物主义的历史分析,与海德格尔的存在与时间的存在分析相协调。为了解释这种开创性的哲学架构,(1)我们将首先展示马尔库斯方法如何建立对历史情境的理解。(2)在第二部分中,我们分析马尔库塞如何以一种非常新颖的方式解释此在的本体论方面。(3)在最后一部分,展示马尔库塞如何运用两种分析的结合点,以论证对揭示的社会异化采取转化行动的必要性。总之,这三个运动试图强调一直占据赫伯特·马尔库塞哲学思考的社会关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Las ilusiones de la multitud” o “imaginarios” y sus efectos el ámbito político, en la filosofía de Baruch Spinoza Benjaminian Reminiscences in Deleuze’s and Daney’s Dialogue about Images in Control Societies Acerca del conocimiento, uso y vivencia de la historia El arte y el artista modernos en Hegel La violencia en Cahiers pour une morale de Jean-Paul Sartre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1