Book Review

Sorin Gog
{"title":"Book Review","authors":"Sorin Gog","doi":"10.2478/subbs-2019-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SORIN GOG1 Neoliberalism has occupied the central focus of research in anthropology and sociology in the past decade and has animated many debates regarding the ways in which the latest stage of global capitalism has to be understood in relation to previous forms of capitalism. There have been many attempts to define this concept and give it a more socio-empirical grounding that can enable capturing the transformations within capitalism and the specific social and economic processes associated with these changes. The field of social sciences have been so much flooded with studies of neoliberalism that some have advocated giving up the term altogether because of the confusions and obscurities it creates (Dunn, 2017). Many of the studies on neoliberalism have dealt with the political processes embedded in the economic structures of global capitalism, but have focused little on what these transformations have meant at the level of subjectformation. How is the self constituted by neoliberalism and what are the inner features the self has to develop in order to be attuned to the new politicaleconomic regime? Neoliberalism cannot function without cultural legitimations that actively sustain the capitalist mode of production in its specific constellations and most of all it cannot function in the absence of social ontologies that regulate the self and corresponding societal relations. Chandler and Reid's book The neoliberal subject: Resilience, adaptation and vulnerability constitutes one of the most articulate contemporary attempts to define these processes in terms of how they impacted on the subject and the specific modes of socialization that were enabled by these new political-economic structures which contributed to the institutionalization of a new generalized self-understanding.","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

SORIN GOG1 Neoliberalism has occupied the central focus of research in anthropology and sociology in the past decade and has animated many debates regarding the ways in which the latest stage of global capitalism has to be understood in relation to previous forms of capitalism. There have been many attempts to define this concept and give it a more socio-empirical grounding that can enable capturing the transformations within capitalism and the specific social and economic processes associated with these changes. The field of social sciences have been so much flooded with studies of neoliberalism that some have advocated giving up the term altogether because of the confusions and obscurities it creates (Dunn, 2017). Many of the studies on neoliberalism have dealt with the political processes embedded in the economic structures of global capitalism, but have focused little on what these transformations have meant at the level of subjectformation. How is the self constituted by neoliberalism and what are the inner features the self has to develop in order to be attuned to the new politicaleconomic regime? Neoliberalism cannot function without cultural legitimations that actively sustain the capitalist mode of production in its specific constellations and most of all it cannot function in the absence of social ontologies that regulate the self and corresponding societal relations. Chandler and Reid's book The neoliberal subject: Resilience, adaptation and vulnerability constitutes one of the most articulate contemporary attempts to define these processes in terms of how they impacted on the subject and the specific modes of socialization that were enabled by these new political-economic structures which contributed to the institutionalization of a new generalized self-understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评
在过去的十年中,新自由主义占据了人类学和社会学研究的中心焦点,并引发了许多关于如何将全球资本主义的最新阶段与以前的资本主义形式联系起来理解的辩论。人们曾多次尝试定义这一概念,并赋予其更多的社会经验基础,以便能够捕捉资本主义内部的转变以及与这些变化相关的具体社会和经济过程。社会科学领域充斥着对新自由主义的研究,有些人主张完全放弃这个术语,因为它造成了混乱和模糊(Dunn, 2017)。许多关于新自由主义的研究都涉及嵌入全球资本主义经济结构中的政治过程,但很少关注这些转变在主体形成层面上的意义。新自由主义是如何构成自我的?为了适应新的政治经济体制,自我必须发展哪些内在特征?新自由主义不能在没有文化合法性的情况下运作,这种文化合法性积极地维持资本主义生产方式在其特定的星座中,最重要的是,它不能在缺乏调节自我和相应的社会关系的社会本体论的情况下运作。钱德勒和里德的书《新自由主义主体:韧性、适应性和脆弱性》构成了当代最清晰的尝试之一,从这些过程如何影响主体和社会化的具体模式的角度来定义这些过程,这些社会化模式是由这些新的政治经济结构实现的,这些结构有助于新的广义自我理解的制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Science and Social Knowledge or What We Do Not Know About What We Believe We Know Searching for Authenticity: Critical Analysis of Gender Roles and Radical Movements in Personal Development Practices in Contemporary Society Pros and Cons of Online Social Support Exchange on Social Networking Sites: A User’s Perspective Deindustrialization and the Real-Estate– Development–Driven Housing Regime. The Case of Romania in Global Context Balancing Efficiency and Personal Time Requirements for Human Resources Professionals after Telecommuting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1