A Native Anthropologist’s View on Covering the “Altai Princess” Problem

Q3 Arts and Humanities Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477
N. Tadina
{"title":"A Native Anthropologist’s View on Covering the “Altai Princess” Problem","authors":"N. Tadina","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores conflicts between the Altai community and archeologists due to the discovery of a woman’s mummy, the “Altai Princess,” found in a burial mound of the Pazyryk time (5th–3rd centuries BCE) in the south of Siberia, in the Republic of Altai (Russia). It is argued that a “Native anthropologist” studying her own people and a “visiting anthropologist” illuminates the problem each in their own ways. Attention is drawn to facts indicating the importance of using Indigenous methodologies and research approaches from within a given ethnic culture to understand folk interpretations adequately. Key positions concerning the Altai are outlined on the basis of the author’s field materials. It is emphasized that the demand to (re)bury the “Altai Princess” is based on the tradition of observing the “border” between the earthly and the other world. This corresponds to a key idea of Burkhanism in ritual and everyday life. Discourse about the “Altai princess” can be understood through Altai traditional sacral concepts and practices. Outsider anthropologists’ abstract assertions claiming that the Altai national intelligentsia is responsible for social conflict with archeologists are questioned.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.1950477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores conflicts between the Altai community and archeologists due to the discovery of a woman’s mummy, the “Altai Princess,” found in a burial mound of the Pazyryk time (5th–3rd centuries BCE) in the south of Siberia, in the Republic of Altai (Russia). It is argued that a “Native anthropologist” studying her own people and a “visiting anthropologist” illuminates the problem each in their own ways. Attention is drawn to facts indicating the importance of using Indigenous methodologies and research approaches from within a given ethnic culture to understand folk interpretations adequately. Key positions concerning the Altai are outlined on the basis of the author’s field materials. It is emphasized that the demand to (re)bury the “Altai Princess” is based on the tradition of observing the “border” between the earthly and the other world. This corresponds to a key idea of Burkhanism in ritual and everyday life. Discourse about the “Altai princess” can be understood through Altai traditional sacral concepts and practices. Outsider anthropologists’ abstract assertions claiming that the Altai national intelligentsia is responsible for social conflict with archeologists are questioned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一位本土人类学家对“阿尔泰公主”问题的研究
摘要本文探讨了在西伯利亚南部阿尔泰共和国(俄罗斯)发现的帕日里克时代(公元前5至3世纪)的土堆中发现的一具女性木乃伊“阿尔泰公主”,阿尔泰社区与考古学家之间的冲突。有人认为,一位研究自己民族的“本土人类学家”和一位“来访的人类学家”以各自的方式阐明了这个问题。提请注意的事实表明,在特定的民族文化中使用土著方法和研究方法以充分理解民间解释的重要性。在作者实地资料的基础上,概述了有关阿尔泰的关键位置。强调埋葬“阿尔泰公主”的要求是基于观察世俗与其他世界之间“边界”的传统。这与布尔汗主义在仪式和日常生活中的一个重要思想相对应。关于“阿尔泰公主”的论述可以通过阿尔泰传统的骶骨观念和实践来理解。外部人类学家抽象地断言阿尔泰民族知识分子应对与考古学家的社会冲突负责,这一说法受到了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Dialogues with the Cold: Natural Low Temperatures in the Everyday Life of Rural Residents of Yakutia (Sakha Republic) in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis Fire and Water: Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Climate Challenges in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Manipulations of Public Consciousness in the Environmental Conflict on Kushtau On Defining and Registering the Indigenous Peoples of The North, Siberia and the Far East: Legal Process Documentation and Ramifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1