Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and prognosis of fetal meconium peritonitis

Yingheng Wu, Haiyu Wang, Qiyun Fan, Yansheng Feng, Hong Wang
{"title":"Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and prognosis of fetal meconium peritonitis","authors":"Yingheng Wu, Haiyu Wang, Qiyun Fan, Yansheng Feng, Hong Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of fetal meconium peritonitis (FMP) cases with different ultrasonic manifestations. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 31 pregnant women with FMP diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound and confirmed by postnatal imaging examination in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2011 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the last prenatal ultrasonographic findings, the 31 cases were classified into the following grades: grade 0 (three cases), grade 1 (20 cases, grade 1A: nine cases, grade 1B: three cases, grade 1C: eight cases), grade 2 (seven cases) and grade 3 (one case). All neonates were also divided into two groups: the operation group (19 cases) and conservative treatment group (12 cases) based on whether or not underwent surgery. Statistical methods were independent sample t-test and Chi-square test. \n \n \nResults \n(1) The gestational ages at the first diagnosis of FMP and birth of the operation group were both lower than those of the conservative treatment group [(29.9±4.5) vs (38.2±1.0) weeks, t=-6.202; (36.2±2.7) vs (38.2± 1.0) weeks, t=-2.426; both P<0.05]. (2) The operation rates in cases of grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 groups were 0/3, 55%(11/20), 7/7 and 1/1, respectively (χ2=10.136, P=0.017). However, the operation rates in grade 1A, 1B and 1C groups were 7/9, 1/3 and 3/8, respectively (χ2=3.446, P=0.179). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe rate of operation of FMP newborn was related to the gestational age of the first prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of FMP and the ultrasonic grade. The different grades of prenatal ultrasound in FMP cases can provide important information for guiding perinatal treatment. \n \n \nKey words: \nPeritonitis; Meconium; Ultrasonography, prenatal; Fetal diseases","PeriodicalId":52320,"journal":{"name":"中华围产医学杂志","volume":"23 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华围产医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-9408.2020.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of fetal meconium peritonitis (FMP) cases with different ultrasonic manifestations. Methods The clinical data of 31 pregnant women with FMP diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound and confirmed by postnatal imaging examination in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2011 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the last prenatal ultrasonographic findings, the 31 cases were classified into the following grades: grade 0 (three cases), grade 1 (20 cases, grade 1A: nine cases, grade 1B: three cases, grade 1C: eight cases), grade 2 (seven cases) and grade 3 (one case). All neonates were also divided into two groups: the operation group (19 cases) and conservative treatment group (12 cases) based on whether or not underwent surgery. Statistical methods were independent sample t-test and Chi-square test. Results (1) The gestational ages at the first diagnosis of FMP and birth of the operation group were both lower than those of the conservative treatment group [(29.9±4.5) vs (38.2±1.0) weeks, t=-6.202; (36.2±2.7) vs (38.2± 1.0) weeks, t=-2.426; both P<0.05]. (2) The operation rates in cases of grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 groups were 0/3, 55%(11/20), 7/7 and 1/1, respectively (χ2=10.136, P=0.017). However, the operation rates in grade 1A, 1B and 1C groups were 7/9, 1/3 and 3/8, respectively (χ2=3.446, P=0.179). Conclusions The rate of operation of FMP newborn was related to the gestational age of the first prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of FMP and the ultrasonic grade. The different grades of prenatal ultrasound in FMP cases can provide important information for guiding perinatal treatment. Key words: Peritonitis; Meconium; Ultrasonography, prenatal; Fetal diseases
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿胎粪性腹膜炎的产前超声诊断及预后
目的探讨不同超声表现的胎儿胎粪性腹膜炎(FMP)的母婴结局。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2018年12月在广州市妇幼保健中心经产前超声诊断和产后影像学检查确诊的31例FMP孕妇的临床资料。根据最近的产前超声检查结果,31例病例分为以下级别:0级(3例)、1级(20例,1A级:9例,1B级:3例,1C级:8例)、2级(7例)和3级(1例)。根据是否手术,将所有新生儿分为两组:手术组(19例)和保守治疗组(12例)。统计方法采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验。结果(1)首次诊断为FMP和出生时,手术组的胎龄均低于保守治疗组[(29.9±4.5)vs(38.2±1.0)周,t=-6.202;(36.2±2.7)vs(38.1±1.0)周,t=-2.426;均P<0.05],1A、1B和1C级组的手术率分别为7/9、1/3和3/8(χ2=3.446,P=0.017)。FMP患者不同级别的产前超声检查可为指导围产期治疗提供重要信息。关键词:腹膜炎;胎粪;产前超声检查;胎儿疾病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华围产医学杂志
中华围产医学杂志 Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4446
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Expert consensus on breastfeeding in case of maternal infections Fifteen-minute consultation: ABCDE approach to nutritional assessment in preterm infants早产儿的15分钟营养评估法:ABCDE Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19: a systemic review Premature infant born to a convalescent mother with COVID-19 in mid-term pregnancy How to obtain evidence of vertical transmission of coronavirus according to serological test of specific IgM and IgG antibodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1