Expression of NKX3.1, Prostatic Specific Antigen and Prostatic Specific Alkaline Phosphatase in Cytology Specimens of Metastatic Prostatic Carcinoma

Minhua Wang, Rita Abi-Raad, Adebowale J. Adeniran, G. Cai
{"title":"Expression of NKX3.1, Prostatic Specific Antigen and Prostatic Specific Alkaline Phosphatase in Cytology Specimens of Metastatic Prostatic Carcinoma","authors":"Minhua Wang, Rita Abi-Raad, Adebowale J. Adeniran, G. Cai","doi":"10.14218/jctp.2021.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: NKX3.1 is an emerging marker for tumors of prostatic origin; however, the utility and diagnostic values of NKX3.1 have not been broadly studied in cytology specimens. The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of NKX3.1, compared to prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic specific alkaline phosphatase (PSAP), as an organ-specific marker of metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma (MPAC) in cytology specimens. Methods: The cytology specimens, which had been evaluated to include or exclude MPAC, were collected from our pathology database. Immunostains for PSA, PSAP, and NKX3.1 were performed on cell block sections. Results: A total of 118 cases were collected. In 37 MPACs, NKX3.1 was diffusely positive in 34 cases (92%) and focally positive in 3 cases (8%). PSA indicated diffuse positivity in 16 cases (43%), focal positivity in 13 (35%) cases, and was negative in 8 (22%) cases. PSAP immunostain was performed in only 12 MPACs, showing diffuse positivity in 5 (42%), focal positivity in 3 (25%), and negativity in 4 (33%) cases. Among the 81 non-metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma cases, NKX3.1 was negative in 80 (99%) cases and focally positive in only 1 (1%) case; all cases with available PSA and PSAP staining were negative. The calculated sensitivities for NKX3.1, PSA, and PSAP were 100%, 78%, and 67%, respectively, while the specificities were 99%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to PSA and PSAP, NKX3.1 is more reliable as an individual marker for MPAC in cytology specimens. Combining NKX3.1 and PSA can be useful in some cases to enhance diagnostic utility.","PeriodicalId":73661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and translational pathology","volume":"1 1","pages":"16 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and translational pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14218/jctp.2021.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: NKX3.1 is an emerging marker for tumors of prostatic origin; however, the utility and diagnostic values of NKX3.1 have not been broadly studied in cytology specimens. The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of NKX3.1, compared to prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic specific alkaline phosphatase (PSAP), as an organ-specific marker of metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma (MPAC) in cytology specimens. Methods: The cytology specimens, which had been evaluated to include or exclude MPAC, were collected from our pathology database. Immunostains for PSA, PSAP, and NKX3.1 were performed on cell block sections. Results: A total of 118 cases were collected. In 37 MPACs, NKX3.1 was diffusely positive in 34 cases (92%) and focally positive in 3 cases (8%). PSA indicated diffuse positivity in 16 cases (43%), focal positivity in 13 (35%) cases, and was negative in 8 (22%) cases. PSAP immunostain was performed in only 12 MPACs, showing diffuse positivity in 5 (42%), focal positivity in 3 (25%), and negativity in 4 (33%) cases. Among the 81 non-metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma cases, NKX3.1 was negative in 80 (99%) cases and focally positive in only 1 (1%) case; all cases with available PSA and PSAP staining were negative. The calculated sensitivities for NKX3.1, PSA, and PSAP were 100%, 78%, and 67%, respectively, while the specificities were 99%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to PSA and PSAP, NKX3.1 is more reliable as an individual marker for MPAC in cytology specimens. Combining NKX3.1 and PSA can be useful in some cases to enhance diagnostic utility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NKX3.1、前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺特异性碱性磷酸酶在转移性前列腺癌细胞标本中的表达
背景和目的:NKX3.1是一种新出现的前列腺癌标志物;然而,NKX3.1的实用性和诊断价值尚未在细胞学标本中得到广泛研究。本研究的目的是确定NKX3.1与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和前列腺特异性碱性磷酸酶(PSAP)相比,作为细胞学标本中转移性前列腺腺癌(MPAC)的器官特异性标志物的性能。方法:从我们的病理数据库中收集细胞学标本,这些标本已被评估为包括或排除MPAC。在细胞块切片上进行PSA、PSAP和NKX3.1的免疫染色。结果:共收集118例。在37例MPAC中,NKX3.1弥漫性阳性34例(92%),局灶性阳性3例(8%)。PSA显示弥漫性阳性16例(43%),局灶性阳性13例(35%),阴性8例(22%)。PSAP免疫染色仅在12例MPAC中进行,其中5例(42%)呈弥漫性阳性,3例(25%)呈局灶性阳性,4例(33%)呈阴性。在81例非转移性前列腺癌中,NKX3.1阴性80例(99%),局灶性阳性1例(1%);所有可用PSA和PSAP染色的病例均为阴性。NKX3.1、PSA和PSAP的计算灵敏度分别为100%、78%和67%,而特异性分别为99%、100%和100%。结论:与PSA和PSAP相比,NKX3.1作为细胞学标本中MPAC的个体标志物更可靠。在某些情况下,结合NKX3.1和PSA可以提高诊断实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital and Artificial Intelligence-based Pathology: Not for Every Laboratory - A Mini-review on the Benefits and Pitfalls of Its Implementation. Hepatic Biliary Adenofibroma: Histological Characteristics, Diagnostic Challenges, and Its Role as a Precursor to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Standardized Categories and Practical Approaches to Pancreatic Lesions. Histopathologic Features and Differential Diagnosis in Challenging Cases of Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant B-cell Lymphoma/Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma. A Review and Update on Therapy of Gastrointestinal Tract Tumors: From the Bench to Clinical Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1