A comparative study between magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine using ultrasound-guided lumbar-plexus block in lower abdominal surgeries

Mahmoud AbdAlsalam, Nayera Mohamed
{"title":"A comparative study between magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine using ultrasound-guided lumbar-plexus block in lower abdominal surgeries","authors":"Mahmoud AbdAlsalam, Nayera Mohamed","doi":"10.4103/azmj.azmj_100_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim Pain international association of described pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional practice accompanied with actual or potential tissue injuries. Opioid administrations remain the cornerstone of postoperative pain relief, but it may cause significant side effects, including sedations, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention. We aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lumbar-plexus block through adding magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine (DEX) to bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and thereafter surgical operation. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled research was performed on Al-Azhar University Hospitals. A total of 75 cases of both sexes, age between 21 and 65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I– II, were listed for elective lower-abdomen surgical operation underneath general anesthesia. Results Pain scores were decreased significantly in the study groups for 12 and 18 h in BM and BD, respectively, also, there was a significant decrease at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h in the BD group lesser than the BM group postoperatively. The time to the initial analgesic appeal was significantly extended in the BD group (11.9±1 h) than the BM group (10.6±0.7 h). Conclusion Posterior lumbar-plexus block utilizing 22 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with DEX 1 μg/kg decreases pain score, opioid consumption, prolongs duration of analgesia, better hemodynamics stability, and perfect outcome of cases’ satisfaction postoperatively compared with posterior lumbar-plexus block using 22 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with magnesium sulfate 150 mg. DEX provides faster onset time and longer periods of MB and extended period of analgesia with smaller consumptions of postoperative rescue analgesia.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"72 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_100_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aim Pain international association of described pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional practice accompanied with actual or potential tissue injuries. Opioid administrations remain the cornerstone of postoperative pain relief, but it may cause significant side effects, including sedations, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention. We aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided lumbar-plexus block through adding magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine (DEX) to bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia and thereafter surgical operation. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled research was performed on Al-Azhar University Hospitals. A total of 75 cases of both sexes, age between 21 and 65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I– II, were listed for elective lower-abdomen surgical operation underneath general anesthesia. Results Pain scores were decreased significantly in the study groups for 12 and 18 h in BM and BD, respectively, also, there was a significant decrease at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h in the BD group lesser than the BM group postoperatively. The time to the initial analgesic appeal was significantly extended in the BD group (11.9±1 h) than the BM group (10.6±0.7 h). Conclusion Posterior lumbar-plexus block utilizing 22 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with DEX 1 μg/kg decreases pain score, opioid consumption, prolongs duration of analgesia, better hemodynamics stability, and perfect outcome of cases’ satisfaction postoperatively compared with posterior lumbar-plexus block using 22 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% with magnesium sulfate 150 mg. DEX provides faster onset time and longer periods of MB and extended period of analgesia with smaller consumptions of postoperative rescue analgesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导腰丛阻滞下腹部手术中辅助布比卡因的硫酸镁与右美托咪定的比较研究
背景和目的国际疼痛协会将疼痛描述为伴随实际或潜在的组织损伤的一种不愉快的感觉和情感实践。阿片类药物仍然是术后疼痛缓解的基石,但它可能引起严重的副作用,包括镇静、恶心、呕吐和尿潴留。我们的目的是通过在布比卡因中加入硫酸镁和右美托咪定(DEX),比较超声引导下腰丛阻滞对术后镇痛和术后手术的效果。患者和方法本前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究在爱资哈尔大学附属医院进行。选择全麻下腹部择期外科手术75例,男女皆可,年龄21 ~ 65岁,美国麻醉师学会I ~ II级。结果BM组和BD组分别在术后12、18 h疼痛评分明显下降,且BD组术后2、4、6、8、12 h疼痛评分明显低于BM组。BD组达到初始镇痛效果的时间(11.9±1 h)明显长于BM组(10.6±0.7 h)。结论与0.5%布比卡因22 ml加硫酸镁150 mg后路腰丛阻滞相比,0.5%布比卡因22 ml加DEX 1 μg/kg后路腰丛阻滞可降低疼痛评分,减少阿片类药物消耗,延长镇痛时间,血流动力学稳定性更好,术后患者满意度更好。DEX起效时间快,MB时间长,镇痛时间延长,术后抢救镇痛用量小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conservative management versus ventilation tube insertion in children with otitis media with effusion accompanying cleft palate A study of the effect of some musical compositions on glucagon-like peptide 1, insulin, leptin, and body weight of crowded adult albino rats Protective role of Coenzyme Q10 on ultrastructure effect of sodium fluoride on the liver of adult male albino rats Comparative study between manipulation under anesthesia combined with local steroid injection versus local steroid injection alone in resistant cases of coccydynia Oral versus intravenous omeprazole in management of bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1