Government ideology and bailout conditionality in the European financial crisis

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Interactions Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI:10.1080/03050629.2022.2090936
F. Genovese, Héctor Hermida-Rivera
{"title":"Government ideology and bailout conditionality in the European financial crisis","authors":"F. Genovese, Héctor Hermida-Rivera","doi":"10.1080/03050629.2022.2090936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The political economy literature on international bailouts has repeatedly shown that the domestic politics of rescued countries influence international bailout compliance. However, we know less about the domestic politics of bailout negotiations, and especially the type of conditions negotiated by governments of more developed countries with strong ties to international lenders. This paper puts forward an argument about the role of a government’s partisanship in shaping the conditions stipulated between international lenders and developed countries when crises confront the latter. Consistent with political cover theories, we argue that governments of crisis countries seek to scapegoat international institutions in order to push domestically unpleasant reforms. However, when crises affect countries significantly close to international lenders, international institutions may tolerate the scapegoating attitude and accept to emphasize governments’ reforms in the direction of their core ideological constituencies. Focusing on bailout negotiations during the Eurocrisis (2008–2016), we maintain that while important and painful reforms were discussed at the negotiation tables, the involved international lenders also accommodated the policy preferences of both left and right governments of crisis-ridden countries, everything else constant. So, conditionality came with duress, but governments were also able to emphasize reforms on the opponents’ policy issues, hence systematically obtaining fewer measures on their voters’ main policy areas. Regression analyses of an original country-quarter dataset of EU bailout conditionality measures provide support to our hypothesis. The findings are relevant to the analysis of partisan politics in economic negotiations and of democratic deficits in international organizations. Furthermore, this study contributes to understanding the political accessibility and ideological dynamics of international lending beyond the Eurocrisis.","PeriodicalId":51513,"journal":{"name":"International Interactions","volume":"48 1","pages":"897 - 935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2022.2090936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The political economy literature on international bailouts has repeatedly shown that the domestic politics of rescued countries influence international bailout compliance. However, we know less about the domestic politics of bailout negotiations, and especially the type of conditions negotiated by governments of more developed countries with strong ties to international lenders. This paper puts forward an argument about the role of a government’s partisanship in shaping the conditions stipulated between international lenders and developed countries when crises confront the latter. Consistent with political cover theories, we argue that governments of crisis countries seek to scapegoat international institutions in order to push domestically unpleasant reforms. However, when crises affect countries significantly close to international lenders, international institutions may tolerate the scapegoating attitude and accept to emphasize governments’ reforms in the direction of their core ideological constituencies. Focusing on bailout negotiations during the Eurocrisis (2008–2016), we maintain that while important and painful reforms were discussed at the negotiation tables, the involved international lenders also accommodated the policy preferences of both left and right governments of crisis-ridden countries, everything else constant. So, conditionality came with duress, but governments were also able to emphasize reforms on the opponents’ policy issues, hence systematically obtaining fewer measures on their voters’ main policy areas. Regression analyses of an original country-quarter dataset of EU bailout conditionality measures provide support to our hypothesis. The findings are relevant to the analysis of partisan politics in economic negotiations and of democratic deficits in international organizations. Furthermore, this study contributes to understanding the political accessibility and ideological dynamics of international lending beyond the Eurocrisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲金融危机中的政府意识形态与救助条件
关于国际救助的政治经济学文献一再表明,受援国的国内政治影响着国际救助的合规性。然而,我们对救助谈判的国内政治知之甚少,尤其是与国际债权人关系密切的较发达国家政府谈判的条件类型。当发达国家面临危机时,政府的党派关系在形成国际借贷者与发达国家之间规定的条件中所起的作用。与政治掩护理论一致,我们认为,危机国家的政府寻求国际机构的替罪羊,以推动国内不愉快的改革。然而,当危机影响到与国际贷方关系密切的国家时,国际机构可能会容忍这种替罪羊的态度,并接受强调政府朝着其核心意识形态选区的方向进行改革。聚焦于欧元危机(2008-2016年)期间的救助谈判,我们认为,尽管谈判桌上讨论了重要而痛苦的改革,但参与其中的国际贷款人也适应了危机缠身国家的左翼和右翼政府的政策偏好,其他一切都不变。因此,条件限制伴随着胁迫,但政府也能够强调对对手政策问题的改革,因此在选民的主要政策领域系统地获得更少的措施。对欧盟救助条件措施的原始国家/地区数据集的回归分析支持了我们的假设。这些发现与分析经济谈判中的党派政治和国际组织中的民主缺陷有关。此外,本研究有助于理解欧元危机之后国际贷款的政治可及性和意识形态动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Interactions
International Interactions INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: International Interactions is a leading interdisciplinary journal that publishes original empirical, analytic, and theoretical studies of conflict and political economy. The journal has a particular interest in research that focuses upon the broad range of relations and interactions among the actors in the global system. Relevant topics include ethnic and religious conflict, interstate and intrastate conflict, conflict resolution, conflict management, economic development, regional integration, trade relations, institutions, globalization, terrorism, and geopolitical analyses.
期刊最新文献
Demographic Consequences of Major Wars Bombs and Banners: Battlefield Dynamics and Armed Groups’ Use of Nonviolent Tactics in Civil War Climate Harshness, Opportunity, and Environmental Violence Sequencing the Steps to War Corrupting the Battlefield: How Corruption Influences Belligerents’ Battlefield Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1