Once-iconic Pismo clams persist in southern California at low intertidal population densities and with variable recruitment

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 FISHERIES California Fish and Wildlife Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-22 DOI:10.51492/cfwj.108.23
S. Bignami
{"title":"Once-iconic Pismo clams persist in southern California at low intertidal population densities and with variable recruitment","authors":"S. Bignami","doi":"10.51492/cfwj.108.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pismo clam (Tivela stultorum) has experienced substantial population decline in California over the past century, extinguishing most public participation in a once-iconic recreational fishery before the end of the 20th century. A subsequent decrease in data collection has led to uncertainty about the current population status of this species. We conducted 6 years of intertidal Pismo clam population assessment surveys in Orange, San Diego, and southern Los Angeles Counties to provide a current dataset that could help guide research and management efforts in southern California. Pismo clams were observed at 19 out of 27 study sites during 57 days of surveys. Average clam bed density was low (mean 2.0 ± 1.1 clams/m2, median 0.1 ± 0.7 clams/m2, n = 21 sites), especially when considering larger clams ≥ 35 mm (mean 0.3 ± 0.1 clams/m2, median 0.1 ± 0.4 clams/m2), and varied greatly between sites (0.0–98.5 clams/m2), with Orange County densities approximately one order of magnitude lower than those in San Diego County. Juvenile recruitment was generally low or undetectable, except for consistent recruitment within a < 10 km beach area in San Diego County and a much larger, widespread recruitment event in 2022. Multi-year observations at several sites failed to indicate any consistent seasonal or inter-annual population trends. Densities and abundances were similar to recent historic data (< 30 years old), but are substantially lower than populations prior to the 1980s. We conclude that the Pismo clam persists on many southern California beaches at generally low densities and that recruitment is occurring throughout the southern California region with high spatial and temporal variability. This study provides foundational data to help inform Pismo clam conservation management decisions and to which additional monitoring, ecological research, and fishery data collection should be added.","PeriodicalId":29697,"journal":{"name":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.108.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Pismo clam (Tivela stultorum) has experienced substantial population decline in California over the past century, extinguishing most public participation in a once-iconic recreational fishery before the end of the 20th century. A subsequent decrease in data collection has led to uncertainty about the current population status of this species. We conducted 6 years of intertidal Pismo clam population assessment surveys in Orange, San Diego, and southern Los Angeles Counties to provide a current dataset that could help guide research and management efforts in southern California. Pismo clams were observed at 19 out of 27 study sites during 57 days of surveys. Average clam bed density was low (mean 2.0 ± 1.1 clams/m2, median 0.1 ± 0.7 clams/m2, n = 21 sites), especially when considering larger clams ≥ 35 mm (mean 0.3 ± 0.1 clams/m2, median 0.1 ± 0.4 clams/m2), and varied greatly between sites (0.0–98.5 clams/m2), with Orange County densities approximately one order of magnitude lower than those in San Diego County. Juvenile recruitment was generally low or undetectable, except for consistent recruitment within a < 10 km beach area in San Diego County and a much larger, widespread recruitment event in 2022. Multi-year observations at several sites failed to indicate any consistent seasonal or inter-annual population trends. Densities and abundances were similar to recent historic data (< 30 years old), but are substantially lower than populations prior to the 1980s. We conclude that the Pismo clam persists on many southern California beaches at generally low densities and that recruitment is occurring throughout the southern California region with high spatial and temporal variability. This study provides foundational data to help inform Pismo clam conservation management decisions and to which additional monitoring, ecological research, and fishery data collection should be added.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曾经的标志性的皮斯莫蛤在低潮间带种群密度和可变的招募下持续存在于南加州
在过去的一个世纪里,Pismo蛤(Tivela stultorum)在加利福尼亚州的种群数量大幅下降,在20世纪末之前,这一曾经标志性的休闲渔业的大多数公众参与都被扼杀了。随后数据收集的减少导致了该物种目前种群状况的不确定性。我们在奥兰治县、圣地亚哥县和洛杉矶南部县进行了6年的潮间带Pismo蛤种群评估调查,以提供一个有助于指导南加州研究和管理工作的最新数据集。在57天的调查中,在27个研究地点中的19个观察到了Pismo蛤蜊。平均蛤床密度较低(平均2.0±1.1只/m2,中位数0.1±0.7只/m2,n=21个地点),尤其是当考虑到较大的蛤≥35 mm(平均0.3±0.1只/m2,中值0.1±0.4只/m2)时,不同地点之间的密度差异很大(0.0–98.5只/m2),奥兰治县的密度比圣地亚哥县的密度低约一个数量级。除了圣地亚哥县<10公里海滩区域内的持续招募和2022年规模更大、范围更广的招募活动外,青少年招募率通常较低或无法检测。几个地点的多年观测未能表明任何一致的季节性或年际人口趋势。密度和丰度与最近的历史数据相似(<30年),但远低于20世纪80年代之前的人口。我们得出的结论是,Pismo蛤蜊在南加州的许多海滩上以通常较低的密度生存,并且在整个南加州地区都在以高的空间和时间变异性进行繁殖。这项研究提供了基础数据,有助于为皮斯莫蛤保护管理决策提供信息,并应增加额外的监测、生态研究和渔业数据收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tricolored blackbird survey methods Short-term movement patterns of the Pacific sleeper shark off California Isabelline coloration: a heretofore unrecognized chromatic aberration in bighorn sheep Rescuing and monitoring White Sturgeon during drought on the Tuolumne River Trends in pinniped interactions with commercial passenger fisheries vessels in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1