Subjects of History: Administrative Categories, Ethnic Labels, and the Limits of Cultural Citizenship in Ethiopia

Q3 Arts and Humanities Northeast African Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0137
Meckelburg, Abbink
{"title":"Subjects of History: Administrative Categories, Ethnic Labels, and the Limits of Cultural Citizenship in Ethiopia","authors":"Meckelburg, Abbink","doi":"10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In Ethiopia, as elsewhere in Africa, the boundaries of political belonging have always shifted. They continue to do so. Since the 1995 constitution, in a both peculiar and complex manner, ethnicity has been included in the apparatus of rights and practices, with often far-reaching consequences for Ethiopian nation-building. Since 1991, citizenship in Ethiopia can hardly be discussed without reference to the post-1991 ethnofederal system, which was the result of the restructuring of domestic politics based on ethnolinguistic criteria. This reformation of the administrative landscape altered interethnic relations, and although justified as an answer to an age-old national question about belonging, and a guarantor for interethnic peace and justice, problems have abounded. In this article, we analyze Ethiopian citizenship in the wider context of global debates on \"cultural citizenship.\" We examine the bifurcated Ethiopian approach to national and regional citizenship and the language of cultural rights in a historical perspective both as continued subject-making as well as a form of claims-making. Focusing on citizenship and the powers that manifest social boundaries through cultural ascription, we circumvent both the instrumentalist and primordialist gaze on ethnicity and multiculturalism. Ethnicity appears as a reservoir and idiom of political appropriation within an evolving system of state-subject relations that has left the status of citizenship unresolved.","PeriodicalId":35635,"journal":{"name":"Northeast African Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"137 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/nortafristud.20.1-2.0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:In Ethiopia, as elsewhere in Africa, the boundaries of political belonging have always shifted. They continue to do so. Since the 1995 constitution, in a both peculiar and complex manner, ethnicity has been included in the apparatus of rights and practices, with often far-reaching consequences for Ethiopian nation-building. Since 1991, citizenship in Ethiopia can hardly be discussed without reference to the post-1991 ethnofederal system, which was the result of the restructuring of domestic politics based on ethnolinguistic criteria. This reformation of the administrative landscape altered interethnic relations, and although justified as an answer to an age-old national question about belonging, and a guarantor for interethnic peace and justice, problems have abounded. In this article, we analyze Ethiopian citizenship in the wider context of global debates on "cultural citizenship." We examine the bifurcated Ethiopian approach to national and regional citizenship and the language of cultural rights in a historical perspective both as continued subject-making as well as a form of claims-making. Focusing on citizenship and the powers that manifest social boundaries through cultural ascription, we circumvent both the instrumentalist and primordialist gaze on ethnicity and multiculturalism. Ethnicity appears as a reservoir and idiom of political appropriation within an evolving system of state-subject relations that has left the status of citizenship unresolved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史科目:行政类别,种族标签,以及埃塞俄比亚文化公民身份的限制
摘要:与非洲其他国家一样,在埃塞俄比亚,政治归属的界限总是在变化。他们继续这样做。自1995年宪法以来,种族问题以一种特殊而复杂的方式被纳入权利和实践机制,对埃塞俄比亚的国家建设往往产生深远的影响。自1991年以来,在讨论埃塞俄比亚的公民身份时,很难不提到1991年后的民族联邦制度,这是根据民族语言标准调整国内政治的结果。这一行政格局的改革改变了种族间关系,虽然有理由作为一个关于归属的古老民族问题的答案和种族间和平与正义的保证,但问题比比皆是。在这篇文章中,我们在全球关于“文化公民”辩论的更广泛背景下分析埃塞俄比亚公民身份。我们从历史的角度审视埃塞俄比亚对国家和地区公民身份和文化权利语言的分歧,既作为持续的主题制作,也作为一种形式的索赔。关注公民身份和通过文化归属体现社会界限的权力,我们规避了工具主义和原始主义对种族和多元文化主义的关注。在不断演变的国家-主体关系体系中,种族似乎是政治挪用的蓄水池和习语,而公民身份的地位尚未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Northeast African Studies
Northeast African Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Quest for Self-Determination and the State in Ethiopia: The Oromo Popular Uprising of 2014–2017 in Historical Perspective Race, Gender, and Pageantry: The Ups and Downs of an African American Woman in Imperial Ethiopia Dr. Abebe Ambatchew (1934–2022) National Integration through Political Marginalization: Contradictions of Nation-Building in Ethiopia The Past of Ethiopia's Present: Unfolding Crises, Cyclical Violence, and Competing Nationalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1