Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). Review and recent advances

Q4 Medicine Forum of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.2478/fco-2022-0005
D. Galiti, Aikaterini Karayianni, K. Tsiklakis, A. Psyrri
{"title":"Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). Review and recent advances","authors":"D. Galiti, Aikaterini Karayianni, K. Tsiklakis, A. Psyrri","doi":"10.2478/fco-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is defined as a complication, which affects the jawbone of patients that meet all of the following criteria: (a) patients were in the past or are now on treatment with bone targeting agents (BTAs) and/or antiangiogenics, (b) they have exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula for more than 8 weeks, and (c) they have no history of radiotherapy or obvious metastatic disease to the jaws. Since the first reports, in 2003, plethora of articles on MRONJ significantly increased our knowledge of this potentially serious complication. However, controversies about the definition and clinical presentation, risk factors, radiological findings, staging and early diagnosis, prevention and treatment may affect the successful management and the quality of life of cancer patients. The purpose of this article is to present the current knowledge about MRONJ and the recent advances to best clinical practice and treatment. Important questions will be discussed, including the following: (1) Should we wait for 8 weeks when a patient on antiresorptive therapy, presents with exposed necrotic jawbone? (2) Can we exclude the diagnosis of osteonecrosis if a patient presents without exposed bone? (3) Is the dental extraction a risk factor for MRONJ? (4) Should we perform the dental extraction, when a patient on antiresorptives, presents with a symptomatic tooth? (5) What is the role of dental or periodontal infection? (6) Shall we re-start the antiresorptives following healing of previous MRONJ?","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is defined as a complication, which affects the jawbone of patients that meet all of the following criteria: (a) patients were in the past or are now on treatment with bone targeting agents (BTAs) and/or antiangiogenics, (b) they have exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula for more than 8 weeks, and (c) they have no history of radiotherapy or obvious metastatic disease to the jaws. Since the first reports, in 2003, plethora of articles on MRONJ significantly increased our knowledge of this potentially serious complication. However, controversies about the definition and clinical presentation, risk factors, radiological findings, staging and early diagnosis, prevention and treatment may affect the successful management and the quality of life of cancer patients. The purpose of this article is to present the current knowledge about MRONJ and the recent advances to best clinical practice and treatment. Important questions will be discussed, including the following: (1) Should we wait for 8 weeks when a patient on antiresorptive therapy, presents with exposed necrotic jawbone? (2) Can we exclude the diagnosis of osteonecrosis if a patient presents without exposed bone? (3) Is the dental extraction a risk factor for MRONJ? (4) Should we perform the dental extraction, when a patient on antiresorptives, presents with a symptomatic tooth? (5) What is the role of dental or periodontal infection? (6) Shall we re-start the antiresorptives following healing of previous MRONJ?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颌骨药物相关性骨坏死(MRONJ)。回顾和最新进展
文摘与骨坏死的下巴(MRONJ)被定义为一个并发症,影响病人的颚骨满足以下所有条件:(一)患者在过去或现在与代理骨靶向治疗(bta)和/或反血管增生,(b)他们已经暴露的骨或骨,可以通过intraoral或探测extraoral瘘超过8周,和(c)他们没有历史的下巴放疗或明显的转移性疾病。自2003年首次报道以来,大量关于MRONJ的文章显著增加了我们对这一潜在严重并发症的认识。然而,在定义和临床表现、危险因素、影像学表现、分期和早期诊断、预防和治疗等方面的争议可能会影响癌症患者的成功管理和生活质量。本文的目的是介绍目前关于MRONJ的知识以及最佳临床实践和治疗的最新进展。重要的问题将被讨论,包括:(1)当患者接受抗吸收治疗,出现暴露的坏死颌骨时,我们是否应该等待8周?(2)如果患者没有暴露的骨头,我们可以排除骨坏死的诊断吗?(3)拔牙是MRONJ的危险因素吗?(4)当病人使用抗吸收剂后出现牙齿症状时,我们是否应该进行拔牙?(5)牙齿或牙周感染的作用是什么?(6)既往MRONJ愈合后是否重新开始抗吸收?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forum of Clinical Oncology
Forum of Clinical Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breast cancer recurrence and tumor size: A bibliometric analysis Outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: A single-center retrospective study Glomerulonephritis as a paraneoplastic event from prostate cancer relapse Change of dosing paradigm in oncology Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a review across studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1