Reflections on dying patients, hospices, assisted suicide, and euthanasia

IF 0.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS International Forum of Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1080/0803706X.2022.2032332
C. Sjödin
{"title":"Reflections on dying patients, hospices, assisted suicide, and euthanasia","authors":"C. Sjödin","doi":"10.1080/0803706X.2022.2032332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract My parents’ death struggle, my clinical work with dying patients, the euthanasia of Freud, and a fear of dementia form the background to my reflections on dying patients, hospices, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. The change in public opinion has resulted in a displacement from Nazi crimes to the present focus on the right to self-determination. Consequently, a law allowing assisted suicide or euthanasia has been adopted in several locations, such as Oregon in the USA, the Benelux countries, Switzerland, and Canada. The fear of suffering, hopelessness, and inability are strong arguments to allow euthanasia and aided suicide. A compelling case against it is its negative social consequences, the infringement into the private sphere when the sick person and their family must decide if they are willing to accept assisted suicide or euthanasia. Although the “right to death” provides freedom to some, for others it is a forced choice that interferes with the dying process. I conclude by highlighting the palliative model, wherein death is perceived as a part of an individual’s life and as a normal process, although this task is hard for the family to contain, especially when the dying person is in pain and agony. Dying is not merely an individual process. It affects the whole family as well as the future generations’ views on reciprocity and responsibility.","PeriodicalId":43212,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2022.2032332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract My parents’ death struggle, my clinical work with dying patients, the euthanasia of Freud, and a fear of dementia form the background to my reflections on dying patients, hospices, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. The change in public opinion has resulted in a displacement from Nazi crimes to the present focus on the right to self-determination. Consequently, a law allowing assisted suicide or euthanasia has been adopted in several locations, such as Oregon in the USA, the Benelux countries, Switzerland, and Canada. The fear of suffering, hopelessness, and inability are strong arguments to allow euthanasia and aided suicide. A compelling case against it is its negative social consequences, the infringement into the private sphere when the sick person and their family must decide if they are willing to accept assisted suicide or euthanasia. Although the “right to death” provides freedom to some, for others it is a forced choice that interferes with the dying process. I conclude by highlighting the palliative model, wherein death is perceived as a part of an individual’s life and as a normal process, although this task is hard for the family to contain, especially when the dying person is in pain and agony. Dying is not merely an individual process. It affects the whole family as well as the future generations’ views on reciprocity and responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终病人、临终关怀、协助自杀和安乐死的思考
摘要我父母的死亡斗争,我与垂死病人的临床工作,弗洛伊德的安乐死,以及对痴呆症的恐惧,构成了我思考垂死病人、临终关怀、协助自杀和安乐死的背景。公众舆论的变化导致人们从纳粹罪行转向目前对自决权的关注。因此,一些地方通过了允许协助自杀或安乐死的法律,如美国俄勒冈州、比荷卢三国、瑞士和加拿大。对痛苦、绝望和无力的恐惧是允许安乐死和协助自杀的有力论据。一个令人信服的案例是它的负面社会后果,即当病人及其家人必须决定他们是否愿意接受协助自杀或安乐死时,侵犯了私人领域。尽管“死亡权”为一些人提供了自由,但对另一些人来说,这是一种干扰死亡过程的被迫选择。最后,我强调了缓和模式,即死亡被视为个人生活的一部分,是一个正常的过程,尽管这项任务对家庭来说很难控制,尤其是当垂死的人处于痛苦之中时。死亡不仅仅是一个个体的过程。它影响到整个家庭以及后代对互惠和责任的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Forum of Psychoanalysis
International Forum of Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Lore Reich Rubin, MD 1928–2024 Notes on some non-psychotic hypochondriacal states On the phenomenality of thought – the nature of thinking and the corresponding physical pathways Linguistics and psychoanalysis: A new perspective on language processing and evolution On female melancholia in migration: Interpretations from Turkish-Muslim culture with a case vignette
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1