Partisan Supremacy in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1086/724549
M. Graber
{"title":"Partisan Supremacy in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates","authors":"M. Graber","doi":"10.1086/724549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Lincoln-Douglas debates were between a representative of the Democratic Party and a representative of the Republican Party. Stephen A. Douglas began his presentation in the fi rst debate by declaring, “ We are present here to-day for the purpose of having a joint discussion as the representatives of the two great political parties of the State and Union, upon the principles in issue between these parties and this vast concourse of people ” (Lincoln 1953, 3:1). Lincoln stood before the voters as a representative of the Republican Party. He began his presentation in the second debate by stating, “ I have supposed myself, since the organization of the Republican party at Bloomington, in May 1856, bound as a party man by the platforms of the party ” (3:39). He continued, “ if any one expects me — in the case of my elec[tion] — that I will do anything not signi fi ed by our Republican platform . . . , I tell you very frank that person will be deceived ” (3:71 – 72). What the Republican and Democratic Parties stood for and which party was more faithful to the Constitution of the United States were the central issues in the Lincoln-Douglas debates.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"12 1","pages":"222 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Lincoln-Douglas debates were between a representative of the Democratic Party and a representative of the Republican Party. Stephen A. Douglas began his presentation in the fi rst debate by declaring, “ We are present here to-day for the purpose of having a joint discussion as the representatives of the two great political parties of the State and Union, upon the principles in issue between these parties and this vast concourse of people ” (Lincoln 1953, 3:1). Lincoln stood before the voters as a representative of the Republican Party. He began his presentation in the second debate by stating, “ I have supposed myself, since the organization of the Republican party at Bloomington, in May 1856, bound as a party man by the platforms of the party ” (3:39). He continued, “ if any one expects me — in the case of my elec[tion] — that I will do anything not signi fi ed by our Republican platform . . . , I tell you very frank that person will be deceived ” (3:71 – 72). What the Republican and Democratic Parties stood for and which party was more faithful to the Constitution of the United States were the central issues in the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林肯-道格拉斯辩论中的党派至上
林肯和道格拉斯的辩论是在民主党代表和共和党代表之间进行的。在第一次辩论中,斯蒂芬·a·道格拉斯(Stephen a . Douglas)在演讲开始时宣布:“我们今天在这里是为了作为州和联邦两大政党的代表,就这些政党和广大人民之间存在争议的原则进行联合讨论”(Lincoln 1953, 3:1)。林肯作为共和党的代表站在选民面前。在第二场辩论中,他这样开场:“自从共和党于1856年5月在布卢明顿成立以来,我一直认为自己是一个受党的纲领约束的党员”(3:39)。他接着说,“如果有人期望我——就我的竞选而言——我会做任何不符合我们共和党政纲的事情……我实在告诉你们,那人是被欺哄的”(3:71 - 72)。共和党和民主党的立场是什么,哪个党更忠于美国宪法,这些都是林肯和道格拉斯辩论的核心问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Political Thought
American Political Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
:The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism :The Cambridge Companion to Montesquieu Conservative Progressivism? Michael Cunniff, Federalism, and the Founding of Arizona :America’s Philosopher: John Locke in American Political Life “Dishonorable to the American Character”: James Madison and the Impact of the Federal Convention’s Bargain on Slavery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1