La Réception critique de l'écriture engagée de Jean Genet: les exemples de «Violence et brutalité» et d'Un captif amoureux

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE Nottingham French Studies Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.3366/NFS.2021.0304
Karl Ågerup
{"title":"La Réception critique de l'écriture engagée de Jean Genet: les exemples de «Violence et brutalité» et d'Un captif amoureux","authors":"Karl Ågerup","doi":"10.3366/NFS.2021.0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the critical reception of two of Jean Genet's most political texts is studied and discussed with regards to the theoretical opposition between poetical and political language. While Un captif amoureux had a fairly heterogeneous and confused reception, ‘Violence et brutalité’ was generally rejected and described as pro-terrorist propaganda. This difference is explained as a result of both textual and historical factors. Moreover, the critics’ inability to attach a genre to Un captif amoureux is discussed and explained as a result of the work's innovative style and structure, for example its particular way of assembling political and poetical patterns.","PeriodicalId":19182,"journal":{"name":"Nottingham French Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"50-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nottingham French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/NFS.2021.0304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the critical reception of two of Jean Genet's most political texts is studied and discussed with regards to the theoretical opposition between poetical and political language. While Un captif amoureux had a fairly heterogeneous and confused reception, ‘Violence et brutalité’ was generally rejected and described as pro-terrorist propaganda. This difference is explained as a result of both textual and historical factors. Moreover, the critics’ inability to attach a genre to Un captif amoureux is discussed and explained as a result of the work's innovative style and structure, for example its particular way of assembling political and poetical patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对让·热内参与写作的批判性接受:“暴力和野蛮”和一个恋爱俘虏的例子
本文从诗歌语言与政治语言的理论对立入手,对让·热内两部最具政治色彩的文本的批评接受进行了研究和探讨。虽然Un caption amoureux受到的欢迎相当多样化和混乱,但“暴力与暴行”通常被拒绝,并被描述为亲恐怖主义的宣传。这种差异是文本因素和历史因素共同作用的结果。此外,由于作品的创新风格和结构,例如其独特的政治和诗歌模式组合方式,评论家们无法将一种类型附加到《无字幕爱情》中,并对此进行了讨论和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nottingham French Studies
Nottingham French Studies LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Nottingham French Studies is an externally-refereed academic journal which, from Volume 43, 2004, appears three times annually, with at least one special and one general issue each year. Its Editorial Board is drawn from members of the Department of French and Francophone Studies of the University of Nottingham, with the support of an International Advisory Board.
期刊最新文献
Open Your Ears, Paris Dada! Where Is Your Music Coming From? Decidedly For and Against the Future: Dada and Other Arts for Life Introduction Attention Seeking: Tristan Tzara's Art Critical Prose Poetry Performing the Paradox in the Theatre of Tristan Tzara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1